Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Being Mr. Meghan Markle is no honeymoon (The Spectator)

325 replies

Thedom · 30/04/2025 07:11

Sorry, archive not working, so posted the whole article here.

Interesting tidbit about his turn at the aviation thingy, he was either joking and it landed like a lead balloon or he was being sarcasric about being railroaded into having to cough up for a few tables (probably the latter knowing how he hates to pay for anything)

…………..

“Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are finally enjoying their “honeymoon period.” Or they are according to the Duchess of Sussex, who made the statement on a fawning podcast as part of a brand building media blitz – and who certainly seems to be enjoying herself.

But has she asked her husband if he’s reveling in their belated honeymoon quite as much as she is? Once the spare to the throne, his presence as her forlorn shadow at events to honor her now appears largely surplus to requirements even to Meghan.

“That man loves me so much,” she gushed on Montecito neighbor Jamie Kern Lima’s podcast on Monday. She likened their relationship to a video game where you “slay the dragon, save the princess.” An analogy that firmly implies she is the glittering prize and he should be happy with winning her hand.

“You have to imagine, at the beginning, everyone has butterflies, and then we immediately went into the trenches together right out of the gate, six months into dating,” Meghan added. “So now, seven years later when you have a little bit of breathing space, you can just enjoy each other in a new way, and that’s why I feel like it’s more of a honeymoon period for us now.”

As ever, Meghan’s truth does not necessarily accord with everyone else’s reality.

It’s been a tough week for Harry as Mr. Meghan Markle. His wife undermined his latest warning about the dangers of social media for children by posting photos of their own children on Instagram. He bombed at the Hollywood aviation awards. And he was snubbed by Meghan at the Time100 Summit.

All while his brother Prince William looked every bit the senior statesman with world leaders at the Pope’s funeral in Rome.

Harry’s public troubles began in New York last week. While unveiling a memorial dedicated to the memory of children whose families believe harmful online behavior contributed to their deaths, he demanded stronger protection for young people from the dangers of social media. He was “grateful” that his children were still too young to be online, he said.

Too young, that is, unless Archie and Lilibet are helping Meghan promote her brands.

Meghan used their three-year-old daughter to promote her jam, or rather “preserves” as she calls them (jam has too much sugar, apparently), on social media on Sunday. She posted an Instagram Story showing her stirring her homemade strawberry preserves, saying, “What do you think Lili?” A child’s hand can be seen and a voice purporting to be Lili – but sounding strangely AI – is heard saying, “I think it’s beautiful.”

Meghan also posted Instagram pictures of Lili and son Archie, five, in her rose garden, tastefully obscuring their beautiful red hair and faces. How discrete.

Harry’s woes were compounded during his trip to New York by his wife’s apparent lack of interest in him. When he stepped out of the couple’s car at the TIME event on Wednesday, he reached out to Meghan to hold her hand. But – right in front of the waiting paparazzi – she ignored him, turned away and instead enthusiastically hugged a woman waiting to greet her.

A blushing Harry grimaced, as if he instantly knew the media would seize on it (he was correct), then awkwardly adjusted the back waistband of his trousers under his jacket and dutifully trotted through a door behind his wife as she was ushered in by staff and security. Was it take your husband to work day?

Once inside the auditorium at Jazz at Lincoln Center, Harry was forced to take a literal back seat, applauding enthusiastically from the audience as Meghan trotted out some of her signature lines, such as, “Part of what is really, really important is that love language of taking care of people also feeds me.”

Meghan, wearing a $4,000 Ralph Lauren suit, gave her soft keynote speech promoting her show, podcast, lifestyle brand and family. This marked a stark contrast with the other speakers, such as Yulia Navalnaya, who talked about fighting for human rights after her late husband, the prominent Russian opposition leader and critic of President Vladimir Putin, died in prison.

Making Harry’s recent “whining” about being stripped of his UK security details seem petty. Then Harry was off – alone – to the Living Legends of Aviation Awards, where last year he was honored for his work as an Apache helicopter pilot in Afghanistan.

From the stage at the Beverly Hills Hotel on Friday, Harry thanked the first responders who risked their lives to save those devastated by the California fires, but also took a petulant shot at organizers with a joke that didn’t land well. “I feel like I picked the short straw,” he began.

“Someone had to host a bunch of pilots and firefighters, that’s where they are, there are five tables. I agreed with the organizers that it would be a good idea, let’s get them along. I did not agree to hosting two of the tables.”

The sad contrast with William could not be more obvious, royal biographer, writer and broadcaster Hugo Vickers tells The Spectator. “One of them is doing a good job for the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth. And the other’s doing nothing.”

Vickers believes Haz, as he is nicknamed by Meghan, is hanging on to his wife for dear life, “Harry is petrified of her and petrified of losing her. It is a nasty syndrome. And maybe I’m wrong, maybe they’re blissfully happy, but he doesn’t look happy.

“Now he’s just sort of dangling about in the background of Meghan’s various other things she’s promoting.”

Vickers added that the Sussex children’s appearances on Meghan’s Instagram makes them “awful pawns in the middle of this game.”

“All this gooey talk that you get from Meghan about connectivity and love and stuff doesn’t seem to extend to her own family, does it? She’s playing silly games with them. I just have a horrible feeling it’s all going to end badly somehow.”

How much longer can this go on? The old Harry, with his jack-the-lad swagger and roguish sense of humor, was hugely popular with the public, the royals and the media. His former friends, who were pushed aside when he met Meghan, miss that version of Harry. We miss that Harry.

Perhaps it is time for the prince to pack away his paranoia, apologize and start building bridges with his father, brother and the media, if it is not too late and he loses the petering goodwill toward him that still remains. That couldn’t possibly be more humiliating than this flower-sprinkled existence as Mr. Meghan Markle.”

OP posts:
Profhilodisaster · 02/05/2025 22:53

Absolutely brilliant, you bunch of nutters 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Arraminta · 02/05/2025 23:10

MaryMungoNMidge · 02/05/2025 22:42

Ah, that saucy minx Eliza Bennet was exceedingly diverted by Sir Walter's massive chopper! However, it is a truth, universally acknowledged that no queen of these fair isles can resist a gentleman in possession of a good tuning fork. Sir Christopher won back his love with a heartfelt rendition on the pianoforte of Lady Celine Dion's opus, My Heart Will Go On. Captivated, Eliza agreed to mount his BMX and the two rode off in the direction of Plymouth, leaving Sir Walter alone with only his chopper as a source of solace. Once at Plymouth, the two took up position at the bow of the The Golden Heinz, captained by Sir Christophers's trusty friend, Sir Nick Drake. With the whole ship's crew now singing back up vocals to My Heart Will Go On, Eliza's beau swiftly took her up the channel, a journey climaxing in unexpected cannon fire that inadvertently took out a group of Spanish tourists taking a turn around the Isle of Wight.

Yes, as I recall that sorry incident of the burnt Spanish tourists came to be known as The Singeing of the King of Spain's Beard, did it not? The Spanish Monarch, at the time, being none other than the notorious King Antonio Banderras IV, who was an unlikely heir to the throne having forged a successful career in the porn industry. His appearance in the explicit 'Pussy In Boots' is still considered his defining role.

Welcometothewhitelotus · 02/05/2025 23:27

MaryMungoNMidge · 02/05/2025 21:24

That's so interesting! I am so glad that young Jane got to have a bit of fun before being cruelly executed at the Tower by her cousin, Queen Mary Bennett. It is rumoured that Mary was wildly jealous of her triple breasted cous, believing that her nippular advantage had garnered the her the ardent admiration of Carlos Bingley 5, Emperor of Gran Canaria. Little did she know that it was, in fact, her own sister, Elizabeth Bennet who was the main threat to her future health and happiness, though Elizabeth would prove immune to the charms of Carlos, preferring instead to be entertained by privateer, lute player and court gigolo, Sir Christopher Martin.

Edit. Breasted, not breaded. The Warburton Affair is a whole different story.

Edited

Yes the Warburton Affair was covered up by the Establishment. John Profumo had been having an affair with the heir to the Warburton company but it turned out he was using his factories to add state secrets into the loaves of bread which were being shipped to the USSR. When it was found out of course they realised a gay affair would have rocked the nation and, additionally, the Queen was such a fan of the humble Warburton’s loaf that she could not bear for the company to be so traduced in the newspapers. Enter one Christine Keeler and the rest as they say is history.

foreverblowingbubbless · 03/05/2025 02:43

Serenster · 02/05/2025 21:20

Me too. Never has there been a better opportunity to post this. (The Latin translates as “Prince William pushed Prince Harry onto the dog bowl” 🤣 )

😂😂😂😂😂

foreverblowingbubbless · 03/05/2025 02:51

Tomatotater · 02/05/2025 11:33

Buck House costs an absolute fortune in upkeep ( paid for by us) so it should be open to the public far more than it it, and for longer. If tourists want to see it, they can and will pay to see it all year round. the occasional balcony appearance can still be done. Trooping of the colour is done at the Tower of London and it hasn't been a residence for hundreds of years. Get the brothers, nieces, nephews etc who live in the numerous residences to pay a proper rent. Charles says he's an environmentalist (as does William) but their numerous residences are all fully lit, heated and staffed at all times, despite no one being in residence most of the time. Its all a bit 'Do as I say, so I don't have to'.

What the flip? 😂🤷‍♀️

MaryMungoNMidge · 03/05/2025 08:39

Arraminta · 02/05/2025 23:10

Yes, as I recall that sorry incident of the burnt Spanish tourists came to be known as The Singeing of the King of Spain's Beard, did it not? The Spanish Monarch, at the time, being none other than the notorious King Antonio Banderras IV, who was an unlikely heir to the throne having forged a successful career in the porn industry. His appearance in the explicit 'Pussy In Boots' is still considered his defining role.

Indeed! Accounts of The Singeing of the King of Spain's Beard can be found in contemporary letters and reports from figures like Lord Frankie Howard of Effinghellham and Sir Chesney Hawkes, and are available from the National Archives.

However, you do a disservice in not examining the counterfactual historical analysis of King Antonio's choices. Known to modern historians as the "my truth" or "King Harry IX" doctrine.

King Antonio, or Prince Antonio as he was, had sailed to England on the invitation of Tonbridge Wells Amateur Dramatics society led by a rather pert young minx who had taken his fancy. His ship was torched by cannon fire. The history books say his ship took 57 shots from the Golden Heinz, but Prince Antonio thinks and therefore asserts as his truth that a 58th shot - the one that really singed his beard and led to the balderment of his crown - was friendly fire from his own fleet, led by his step mother, Admiral Penelope Cruz, a woman of high intelligence and spite. Upon bombardment with further ejaculation from Drake's cannon, Cruz ordered the entire fleet to retreat to Spain, and with not a single attempt at rescue, left Prince Antonio stranded in Plymouth and cut off with ne'er a deck hand to help him.

Prince Antonio first travelled to the English Court, where he hoped to receive relief for his predicament - for though he was the foul enemy, he did have superior royal blood and should therefore be treated with exceptional courtesy and deference. Alas, his appeals were rejected again and again. He begged for assistance from the Spanish ambassador, Eustace Chapuys, but this too fell on deaf ears. Antonio began referring to Chapuys, a long-legged creep with eyes in the back of his head and a canny knack of appearing in the corner of the English royal court, ensnaring gossipy courtiers like flies in his web of intrigue, as The Spiderman. The Spiderman too was plotting against young Prince Antonio! So Antonio believed anyway. In reality, the English courtiers affectionately referred to the ambassador as "Useless Chappy" and knew he only hung around the English court in the hope of a free pie and a pint from a goodnatured Privy Councillor.

So Prince Antonio, out of all other options, travelled to Tonbridge Wells and sought refuge with his actress temptress and her merry amateur dramatics society. Hoping for a dignified role in a Shakespearean review, as a Henry V or even a Hamlet, he alas discovered that his beloved's company engaged in rather lower forms of entertainment. Thus he was forced to make merry again and again, in front of all and sundry, for the entertainment of peasants and drunkards, his tender parts all on display like sausages on the butcher's block. And all the time his debasement recorded by Sir Nate Flicks, his beloved's constant companion and scribe. His fall was complete.

DelectableMe · 03/05/2025 08:45

@MaryMungoNMidge - fascinating. I'm still trying to book tickets for the Trooping of the Colour at the Tower of London, but don't seem to be having any success. I may email Eustace Chapuys or Charles the Bold of Burgundy.

MaryMungoNMidge · 03/05/2025 09:05

DelectableMe · 03/05/2025 08:45

@MaryMungoNMidge - fascinating. I'm still trying to book tickets for the Trooping of the Colour at the Tower of London, but don't seem to be having any success. I may email Eustace Chapuys or Charles the Bold of Burgundy.

You are asking the wrong people. Tickets to Trooping at the Tower are controlled by the Royal Master of the Tickets, or Ticketmaster if you will. Unless Chapuys and the Bold are those low forms of human, the tout? Or republicans!

DelectableMe · 03/05/2025 09:12

MaryMungoNMidge · 03/05/2025 09:05

You are asking the wrong people. Tickets to Trooping at the Tower are controlled by the Royal Master of the Tickets, or Ticketmaster if you will. Unless Chapuys and the Bold are those low forms of human, the tout? Or republicans!

Even on Ticketmaster it says "no such event" so that's a puzzler. I may just go to the Tower of London and ask.

MaryMungoNMidge · 03/05/2025 09:27

DelectableMe · 03/05/2025 09:12

Even on Ticketmaster it says "no such event" so that's a puzzler. I may just go to the Tower of London and ask.

Well if you do, don't forget to hang around for the changing of the guard and the 2pm parade of the King's First Baton Twirlers, both ace!

DelectableMe · 03/05/2025 09:33

MaryMungoNMidge · 03/05/2025 09:27

Well if you do, don't forget to hang around for the changing of the guard and the 2pm parade of the King's First Baton Twirlers, both ace!

Will do!

Arraminta · 03/05/2025 11:56

MaryMungoNMidge · 03/05/2025 08:39

Indeed! Accounts of The Singeing of the King of Spain's Beard can be found in contemporary letters and reports from figures like Lord Frankie Howard of Effinghellham and Sir Chesney Hawkes, and are available from the National Archives.

However, you do a disservice in not examining the counterfactual historical analysis of King Antonio's choices. Known to modern historians as the "my truth" or "King Harry IX" doctrine.

King Antonio, or Prince Antonio as he was, had sailed to England on the invitation of Tonbridge Wells Amateur Dramatics society led by a rather pert young minx who had taken his fancy. His ship was torched by cannon fire. The history books say his ship took 57 shots from the Golden Heinz, but Prince Antonio thinks and therefore asserts as his truth that a 58th shot - the one that really singed his beard and led to the balderment of his crown - was friendly fire from his own fleet, led by his step mother, Admiral Penelope Cruz, a woman of high intelligence and spite. Upon bombardment with further ejaculation from Drake's cannon, Cruz ordered the entire fleet to retreat to Spain, and with not a single attempt at rescue, left Prince Antonio stranded in Plymouth and cut off with ne'er a deck hand to help him.

Prince Antonio first travelled to the English Court, where he hoped to receive relief for his predicament - for though he was the foul enemy, he did have superior royal blood and should therefore be treated with exceptional courtesy and deference. Alas, his appeals were rejected again and again. He begged for assistance from the Spanish ambassador, Eustace Chapuys, but this too fell on deaf ears. Antonio began referring to Chapuys, a long-legged creep with eyes in the back of his head and a canny knack of appearing in the corner of the English royal court, ensnaring gossipy courtiers like flies in his web of intrigue, as The Spiderman. The Spiderman too was plotting against young Prince Antonio! So Antonio believed anyway. In reality, the English courtiers affectionately referred to the ambassador as "Useless Chappy" and knew he only hung around the English court in the hope of a free pie and a pint from a goodnatured Privy Councillor.

So Prince Antonio, out of all other options, travelled to Tonbridge Wells and sought refuge with his actress temptress and her merry amateur dramatics society. Hoping for a dignified role in a Shakespearean review, as a Henry V or even a Hamlet, he alas discovered that his beloved's company engaged in rather lower forms of entertainment. Thus he was forced to make merry again and again, in front of all and sundry, for the entertainment of peasants and drunkards, his tender parts all on display like sausages on the butcher's block. And all the time his debasement recorded by Sir Nate Flicks, his beloved's constant companion and scribe. His fall was complete.

Beautifully insane.

Uricon2 · 03/05/2025 12:36

DelectableMe · 03/05/2025 08:45

@MaryMungoNMidge - fascinating. I'm still trying to book tickets for the Trooping of the Colour at the Tower of London, but don't seem to be having any success. I may email Eustace Chapuys or Charles the Bold of Burgundy.

I hear Sir Simon of Cowell is currently doing a show around Trooping the Keys and may be good for a few tickets. It's called "Britain's Got Beefeaters".

DelectableMe · 03/05/2025 12:48

Uricon2 · 03/05/2025 12:36

I hear Sir Simon of Cowell is currently doing a show around Trooping the Keys and may be good for a few tickets. It's called "Britain's Got Beefeaters".

Sounds just up my palace, thank you!

MaryMungoNMidge · 03/05/2025 14:10

Uricon2 · 03/05/2025 12:36

I hear Sir Simon of Cowell is currently doing a show around Trooping the Keys and may be good for a few tickets. It's called "Britain's Got Beefeaters".

Sir Simon of Cowell, you say? Is that he of the extremely high rise pantaloons and oversize codpiece?

Uricon2 · 03/05/2025 18:35

He indeed @MaryMungoNMidge . The idea is that instead of selecting the Yeoman Warders on their military service, it will be based on vocal skills and the most poignant story about their Nans. Losers get fed to the ravens.

MovingSwiftlyOn · 04/05/2025 12:07

I’m very late to the party I know, but you are inspired @MaryMungoNMidgeGrinGrinGrinStarStarStarThe Golden Heinz!

Misak · 04/05/2025 17:11

I've learnt so much from this thread. One addition if I may. I am often told (well, I was told once by the man who came to fix my oven) that I look like Kate Bush. So I think it must've been me that Charles had the affair with. And I am therefore William's mother. Not Harry's though.

shockthemonkey · 04/05/2025 17:21

Arraminta · 02/05/2025 17:30

Yes, that's correct. And it was only shortly after that William Del Monte of Orange introduced the orange to England.

So nearly correct, Arraminta - it was all citrus fruits though, not just the orange.

Another easy mistake to make.

jeffgoldblum · 04/05/2025 17:41

Misak · 04/05/2025 17:11

I've learnt so much from this thread. One addition if I may. I am often told (well, I was told once by the man who came to fix my oven) that I look like Kate Bush. So I think it must've been me that Charles had the affair with. And I am therefore William's mother. Not Harry's though.

Totally believe you !!!
i could sense the family resemblance just from your post!

MrsFinkelstein · 06/05/2025 07:43

If you've seen the trend on SM with this song from SNL you may find this funny...

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNd62uJ5N/

TikTok - Make Your Day

https://www.tiktok.com/@veil.of.truth/video/7500314192952544520?_t=ZN-8w7fCWyP6hS&_r=1

MrsFinkelstein · 06/05/2025 07:45

And another, my husband found them last night and showed them to me. He's actually not interested in the RF at all and ignores them, but he saw the reporting on Harry's interview and his immediate response was - "what a twat".

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNd62uAo2/

TikTok - Make Your Day

https://www.tiktok.com/@veil.of.truth/video/7499982093749914898?_t=ZN-8w7fIm2TFm2&_r=1

CigarettesAndLoveBites · 07/05/2025 11:38

BBC admit a "lapse in standards" for not challenging Harry or putting across BP's views. I'd have loved to have seen how Hazza responded to being challenged.
BBC admits to ‘lapse’ in standards after Today coverage of Harry interview

MSN

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/bbc-admits-to-lapse-in-standards-after-today-coverage-of-harry-interview/ar-AA1EfxtI?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=31f3a8a89cca4cab8e77ce0edd1228ac&ei=7

MaryMungoNMidge · 07/05/2025 12:09

Hmm. That apology relates to the Today programme interview with Richard Aitch, an ex royal protection officer who repeated/agreed with the stitch up claim. It falls short of apologising for the original, unchallenged claims made by Harry. They are, imo, conflicted by not wanting to pour cold water on their triumphant exclusive and the journalist who obtained it. Having said that, letting the fool rattle on unchallenged has actually backfired massively on Harry, and that's a good thing.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread