Sentebale #5

[glitterturd]

As I finished the last one.

A thread is like a conversation. They can meander somewhat and then get back on track.

Maybe he was so off his tits on gas and air that he failed to notice?

@BasiliskStare I don't know of one supporting her. Should we start one? 😀

Looking at the lines of legal people lined up today, I am willing some journalist to investiage how much the UK taxpayer has spent on H&M's court cases. He's becoming a vexatious omplainant.

All Harry has to do is give 7 days' notice, which is not a hardship!

If he was so concerned about his security, revealing his kill count was hardly a sensible choice!

He's bloody 40 and he's made his own bed, let him lie in it. I'm sick of this entitled, petulant, whiney pair at this point. He can stay away from the UK. He won't be missed.

Funny how he's safe enough to come for his incessant legal cases!

Or bragging about it in print.

If only Diana had had a headache that night! 😄

Indeed!!!
and we didn’t hear all this guff about Andrew did we!!!
let’s not forget he was the son of the queen!
he served in active duty in the falklands , but no one cared when his security was taken away!!! ( quite rightly!)

🤣🤣

I don't think many care about Harry's either. It's not even been taken away anyway fgs!

No you’re probably right ! Just a convenient stick to use!

The US is full of people who killed Taliban as the war went on for a really long time. We are not providing them with security. We actually have been remiss in providing many US vets with housing, medical care, and job assistance. I don't want my tax dollars to be spent on rich Prince Harry when US vets need help.

Good point !
most of us don’t want you or us to pay either!

Or James Hewitt 🤭

After the Canadian Invictus event, I actually felt Tom Bower should have security to protect him from the SS.

Yes that was awful wasn’t it?
the abuse and bullying of an elderly man filmed for their enjoyment!

Anne , Edward and Andrew were DC of the late Queen and they don’t have 24/7 security.

I understand that King Charles doesn’t directly control the police or the legal framework around armed protection in the UK. But as head of state and a figure with significant influence, it’s not unreasonable to think he could have advocated more strongly for a fair, secure arrangement for Harry, especially given the level of threat and the unique circumstances. It’s less about controlling the police and more about using influence to ensure consistency and fairness, particularly for a senior member of the family who served the country and was born into this life.

It’s also worth noting that Harry wasn’t asking for something outrageous — just the ability to pay for appropriate security when he’s in the UK. That seems like a reasonable request, especially when safety is at stake.

I get that Anne, Edward, and Andrew don’t have 24/7 security, but their situations are different. They don’t face the same level of public scrutiny or security threats that Harry does. Harry’s been in the media spotlight for years and, more recently, has had a lot of controversy and public attention around his personal life. Given the nature of the threats he’s received, it’s not surprising he feels the need for extra protection when he’s in the UK. It’s about keeping him and his family safe, not about comparing to other royals who might not face the same risks.

It’s also worth noting that Harry wasn’t asking for something outrageous — just the ability to pay for appropriate security when he’s in the UK. That seems like a reasonable request, especially when safety is at stake.

But that level of security is not for sale. To anyone.

Firstly, he has a brass neck and can certainly dish it out – he’s not some hapless pensioner being trolled for fun. Secondly, the video just politely asked him questions about what he was doing at Invictus, given his views on Harry and Meghan – views for which he has been rightly criticized for stirring the pot and views for which he has been royally finacially rewarded.

Charles advocating for Harry in any way would be completely contrary to the constitutional role of the monarchy, so it is unreasonable. As to your other points, there is no precedent under RAVEC for a working member of the Royal family to leave the UK. How do you propose that consistency and fairness would be ensured, that being the case? He was born 'into this life' but chose to leave it.

To add a new point, on safety, we forget that MI5 and MI6 are working away in the background. Any credible threat to H will be being addressed without the public knowing anything about it.

Edited for typos

What has RAVEC got to do with KCIII?

So what if he served in Afghanistan. Thousands of people did. Doesn’t give them the right to behave like spoilt brats and demand taxpayers foot the bill to feed their ego

Apart from the fact that Anne was the victim
of an actual attempted kidnapping 🤔