Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry v. NGN

1000 replies

Atlasvue · 19/01/2025 10:02

Starting a thread for Tuesday.
This BBC article covers the basics. This is the last line ….
Tuesday really is the beginning of the end. And someone is going to lose - and lose big.

I have a feeling, that Harry won’t win but he just wants to use the public setting to air his grievances. A therapy session would have worked out much cheaper.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2l00xkgwnyo

Prince Harry leaves the court during his hacking case against the Daily Mirror. He wears a dark coloured suit, white shirt and tie. His barrister David Sherborne, also dressed in a dark suit is on his left.  A crowd of photographers are behind a metal...

Prince Harry versus newspapers: This is the one that matters

Prince Harry’s legal battle against British tabloids for allegedly unlawfully intruding into his life reaches its most important moment on Tuesday.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2l00xkgwnyo

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
Serenster · 22/01/2025 10:57

The defendants only has to make an offer that is high enough that the claimant can’t refuse. The jeopardy, and so the pressure, comes from the costs exposure if they do refuse. So the offer will made to cover what the claimant is likely to be awarded as damages. This is, and always will be, a different amount to what they have spent on lawyers and barristers.

Given that the courts don’t award lavish damages for privacy breaches, and given the defendant had some good defences here - limitation obviously being one of the key ones, it is highly unlikely that they will have had to offer more than a couple of million to put the real jeopardy on Harry to settle. The idea that they will have offered tens of millions (which is what we will be told, I have no doubt) is utterly fanciful. The newspaper didn’t want to go through the with trial, but no-one sane does welcome that. They will have wanted to exit without spending more millions on legal fees, and avoid t risk of unwelcome findings against them. But they also had a good chance of winning, and both sides will have known that.

What ever Harry received by way of settlement, he still has to pay his whole legal team out of that, who were on the brink of an 8 week trial. That bill (for all their preparation work for that) will itself be in the millions. So he’s not going to be in the money here.

pelargoniums · 22/01/2025 10:58

@IcedPurple I know. But I still don’t blame him for settling now – he won’t have had a choice without risking bankruptcy. I’m not applauding his decision nor critiquing hit. I do think it’s better for him to have settled than continue; I don’t think this makes him a worm or that he was holding out for more money all along – I think he doesn’t have a choice. It’s just odd to see everyone go “eugh, what a twat, he settled after all!” when the alternative would be using up even more of the court’s time.

ttcat37 · 22/01/2025 11:01

I imagine a massive chunk of the settlement, if not all, will go to charity. They donate huge amounts every year. I’d love to know how much you lot donate every year whilst you’re sat slagging them off.

Vespanest · 22/01/2025 11:01

he not a dick for settling, he's a dick for posturing himself as the last hope. The almighty Dragon slayer

IcedPurple · 22/01/2025 11:01

pelargoniums · 22/01/2025 10:58

@IcedPurple I know. But I still don’t blame him for settling now – he won’t have had a choice without risking bankruptcy. I’m not applauding his decision nor critiquing hit. I do think it’s better for him to have settled than continue; I don’t think this makes him a worm or that he was holding out for more money all along – I think he doesn’t have a choice. It’s just odd to see everyone go “eugh, what a twat, he settled after all!” when the alternative would be using up even more of the court’s time.

No, the alternative would have been to settle out of court long ago, as the other claimants did. And not go around posing as a 'dragon slayer' when, like everyone else, you have your price.

It's not a question of 'not blaming him' for accepting a settlement now. The clock didn't start ticking today.

IcedPurple · 22/01/2025 11:02

ttcat37 · 22/01/2025 11:01

I imagine a massive chunk of the settlement, if not all, will go to charity. They donate huge amounts every year. I’d love to know how much you lot donate every year whilst you’re sat slagging them off.

You imagine that do you?

MouldyCandy · 22/01/2025 11:03

He obviously needs the money more than he needs to be proved right.

WatchOutMissMarpleIsAbout · 22/01/2025 11:03

ttcat37 · 22/01/2025 11:01

I imagine a massive chunk of the settlement, if not all, will go to charity. They donate huge amounts every year. I’d love to know how much you lot donate every year whilst you’re sat slagging them off.

In proportion with my income. Less since dh retired but extra when I can. If I had more I’d donate more.

Sandwichgen · 22/01/2025 11:04

May I ask Serenster if the NGN apology goes further than is usual in such settlements?

Cublaca · 22/01/2025 11:04

I do not blame him for settling, but he should have done it years ago. This is another sign that they are running out of money, IMHO.

pelargoniums · 22/01/2025 11:04

IcedPurple · 22/01/2025 11:01

No, the alternative would have been to settle out of court long ago, as the other claimants did. And not go around posing as a 'dragon slayer' when, like everyone else, you have your price.

It's not a question of 'not blaming him' for accepting a settlement now. The clock didn't start ticking today.

I’m aware of that. But since he doesn’t have a time machine to go back and settle out of court long ago, that’s irrelevant. The only choices are the ones available now, not the ones available with hindsight: settle, or continue. He chose to settle and it was the right choice imo.

But I think quite a few on the royals board are or will be disappointed that they can’t have an eight-week trial’s worth of sticking the knife in.

Janiie · 22/01/2025 11:04

Vespanest · 22/01/2025 11:01

he not a dick for settling, he's a dick for posturing himself as the last hope. The almighty Dragon slayer

Yep, the dragon slayer settles. It wasn't about the money nooo it was a about getting his truth out there Grin

Alarmclockstop · 22/01/2025 11:05

Interesting Jenny Bond on Sky saying how at parties Harry courted some parts of the press whilst not allowing the BBC the same access.

I would classify this as a draw at best. The apology doesn't go far enough for it to be a win.

But thanks Harry for wasting taxpayers money.

Jacquette · 22/01/2025 11:06

pelargoniums · 22/01/2025 10:52

The apology to Prince Harry in full

NGN offers a full and unequivocal apology to the Duke of Sussex for the serious intrusion by The Sun between 1996 and 2011 into his private life, including incidents of unlawful activities carried out by private investigators working for The Sun.
NGN also offers a full and unequivocal apology to the Duke of Sussex for the phone hacking, surveillance and misuse of private information by journalists and private investigators instructed by them at the News of the World.

NGN further apologises to the Duke for the impact on him of the extensive coverage and serious intrusion into his private life as well as the private life of Diana, Princess of Wales, his late mother, in particular during his younger years.

We acknowledge and apologise for the distress caused to the Duke, and the damage inflicted on relationships, friendships and family, and have agreed to pay him substantial damages. It is also acknowledged, without any admission of illegality, that NGN's response to the 2006 arrests and subsequent actions were regrettable.

NGN also offers a full and unequivocal apology to Lord Watson for the unwarranted intrusion carried out into his private life during his time in Government by the News of the World during the period 2009- 2011.

This includes him being placed under surveillance in 2009 by journalists at the News of the World and those instructed by them. NGN also acknowledges and apologises for the adverse impact this had on Lord Watson's family and has agreed to pay him substantial damages.

In addition, in 2011 News International received information that information was being passed covertly to Lord Watson from within News International. We now understand that this information was false, and Lord Watson was not in receipt of any such confidential information. NGN apologises fully and unequivocally for this.

I think Harry has gotten exactly what he wanted.

I’m happy for Lord Watson too.

Atlasvue · 22/01/2025 11:06

ttcat37 · 22/01/2025 11:01

I imagine a massive chunk of the settlement, if not all, will go to charity. They donate huge amounts every year. I’d love to know how much you lot donate every year whilst you’re sat slagging them off.

As if

OP posts:
Janiie · 22/01/2025 11:07

'But I think quite a few on the royals board are or will be disappointed that they can’t have an eight-week trial’s worth of sticking the knife in'

Quite the contrary. I'm pleased that's it and we won't have to hear his gripes for 8 weeks.

Is this it, all his newspaper cases done or is that Mail one lingering. I can't keep up.

Cublaca · 22/01/2025 11:07

ttcat37 · 22/01/2025 11:01

I imagine a massive chunk of the settlement, if not all, will go to charity. They donate huge amounts every year. I’d love to know how much you lot donate every year whilst you’re sat slagging them off.

I bet it goes into Archewell and its shady finances.

Alarmclockstop · 22/01/2025 11:07

Cublaca · 22/01/2025 11:04

I do not blame him for settling, but he should have done it years ago. This is another sign that they are running out of money, IMHO.

Or a sign that he is beginning to understand the reality of 'money'.

IcedPurple · 22/01/2025 11:08

pelargoniums · 22/01/2025 11:04

I’m aware of that. But since he doesn’t have a time machine to go back and settle out of court long ago, that’s irrelevant. The only choices are the ones available now, not the ones available with hindsight: settle, or continue. He chose to settle and it was the right choice imo.

But I think quite a few on the royals board are or will be disappointed that they can’t have an eight-week trial’s worth of sticking the knife in.

I’m aware of that. But since he doesn’t have a time machine to go back and settle out of court long ago, that’s irrelevant.

It's absolutely not irrelevant.

If you pose as a 'dragon slayer' and say it's all about 'accountability' then of course people are going to see the decisions you make in that context.

Like I say, the clock didn't start ticking today. Nobody is criticising him for accepting the settlement in and of itself. They just haven't forgotten how pompous and grandiose he, and his supporters, have been on this topic for years now.

Alarmclockstop · 22/01/2025 11:09

I do wonder why Harry wasn't in court- I do wonder if re-entry is the reason- Trump never shys away from any chance to make publicity.

Partybagprick · 22/01/2025 11:10

Thedom · 22/01/2025 09:26

it won't be enough to set them up for life, William was reported to have received 1million, I think Harrys' settlement will be around that figure maybe 1.5 / 2 million.

I believe this settlement incorporated the hacking of Catherine's phone, which was into the 100s. Catherine was phone hacked many, many more times than Harry. Even allowing for inflation, I don't see how he would get a larger settlement than William's, save that Murdoch wants rid of the nuisance of it all.

Atlasvue · 22/01/2025 11:10

Jacquette · 22/01/2025 11:06

I think Harry has gotten exactly what he wanted.

I’m happy for Lord Watson too.

That apology isn’t why he went to court- he went to court to prove that those at the top knew what was going on. NGN made no such apology.

It’s been designed to look like he’s won, but he hasn’t. Because the reason why he was suing wasn’t addressed.

This is just a rehash of the private investigator, Princess Diana stuff.

OP posts:
flippantlydone · 22/01/2025 11:10

Harry did get accountability in the form of a full and unequivocal apology of illegal wrongdoing. He is exactly where he would have ended up in 10wks' time. Harry called their bluff and saved the Judiciary/tax payer money.

Atlasvue · 22/01/2025 11:13

flippantlydone · 22/01/2025 11:10

Harry did get accountability in the form of a full and unequivocal apology of illegal wrongdoing. He is exactly where he would have ended up in 10wks' time. Harry called their bluff and saved the Judiciary/tax payer money.

Nope. He went to court to prove those high up in the company knew what was going on.

No such apology was made. This is just a generic sorry for the use of private investigators by journalists.

OP posts:
IcedPurple · 22/01/2025 11:13

flippantlydone · 22/01/2025 11:10

Harry did get accountability in the form of a full and unequivocal apology of illegal wrongdoing. He is exactly where he would have ended up in 10wks' time. Harry called their bluff and saved the Judiciary/tax payer money.

Not exactly. The Sun have not admitted any illegal activity on their own part, which is what Harry allegedly hoped to prove in court.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread