Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family
WinterIsNearlyHere · 22/11/2024 11:08

I don't think it's that much tbh, for this sort of event.

Also just read this:

Prior to the event, economic forecasters, the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR), had predicted a boost of £337m for the UK's economy due to the coronation - including £104m in extra pub spending and an estimated £223m spend from tourism to the UK during the period.
Hotel revenue was also said to be up by 54% compared to the same point in the previous year, while bookings for UK-bound flights for the coronation weekend jumped by 149% within 24 hours of the day being announced, according to TravelPort.
P

menopause59 · 22/11/2024 11:08

Watched it all loved every minute, and it was worth every penny

WinterIsNearlyHere · 22/11/2024 11:09

Just the extra pub spending brought it way more than the cost of the event 🤷🏻‍♀️

ReignOfError · 22/11/2024 11:13

It’s abysmal. And what’s that ‘once in a generation’ crap justification? The bloke was pushing 75 when he was crowned and is unlikely to live to 100. Sometime in the next ten a fifteen years, we will be expected to pay all over again for another funeral and an overblown outdated ceremony.

Snorlaxo · 22/11/2024 11:26

I don’t begrudge costs like police overtime but I think that Charles should have massively streamlined things considering that he won’t be monarch for long. It was a disappointing and ridiculous decision that shows that he’s not as different to monarchs of the past as he thinks.
Simplifying things would have been one of the few ways that he could show any power and he missed a chance to demonstrate that he really believed in modernising the monarchy. Thank goodness there was no investiture ceremony for the new Prince of Wales- I would hope that William steers the Firm into more of a European institution.

Notmoog · 22/11/2024 11:31

" I would hope that William steers the Firm into more of a European institution."
nope, he appears to be cut from the same cloth in terms of screwing every last penny he can from the public but with a massive measure of being a lazy bastard too

OP posts:
Elphame · 22/11/2024 11:32

That would have funded winter fuel payments to 240,000 or more low income pensioners.

I know where I'd rather my tax money went.

Notmoog · 22/11/2024 11:35

Elphame · 22/11/2024 11:32

That would have funded winter fuel payments to 240,000 or more low income pensioners.

I know where I'd rather my tax money went.

but nice singing.....

OP posts:
Hoolahoophop · 22/11/2024 11:39

ReignOfError · 22/11/2024 11:13

It’s abysmal. And what’s that ‘once in a generation’ crap justification? The bloke was pushing 75 when he was crowned and is unlikely to live to 100. Sometime in the next ten a fifteen years, we will be expected to pay all over again for another funeral and an overblown outdated ceremony.

But it was 70 years since the last one.

So they don't always crop up that often.

And it is literally once in a generation unless someone advocates. Given that a monarch dies to make way for the next generation..

HowardTJMoon · 22/11/2024 11:39

Lemonadeand · 22/11/2024 10:49

It’s a historic event, not a “dressing up day”. Just because it’s meaningless to you, doesn’t mean it’s objectively meaningless.

Personally I’m in favour of a middle ground with a more low key royal family, similar to some of the other European countries.

Where's the objective meaning in a big fancy dress parade put on to celebrate someone who was born into privilege getting a bit more privilege? What difference, objectively, does that make?

Begsthequestion · 22/11/2024 11:42

It's embarrassing and shameful that this still goes on.

Hoolahoophop · 22/11/2024 11:50

HowardTJMoon · 22/11/2024 11:39

Where's the objective meaning in a big fancy dress parade put on to celebrate someone who was born into privilege getting a bit more privilege? What difference, objectively, does that make?

Its a bit like those big military displays that some countries like, to demonstrate your countries wealth and power. Only with less implied threat.

All countries do it. Only ours does it with a silly gold coach, oversized twinkly hats and some rather daft costumes. The way we do it shows we are wealthy and secure enough to enjoy our eccentricity. I like it.

I also like capable healthcare, a good standard of living for all and am very keen on a successful education system. There are other areas of wastage that I would attack first, that bring no benefit, financial or otherwise.

Wahoobafoo · 22/11/2024 11:55

Great value for money I’d say!

Wahoobafoo · 22/11/2024 11:56

I thought it would be a lot more than £72million

The Paris Olympics Opening Ceremony cost €1 billion and that was really shite 💩

Sdpbody · 22/11/2024 11:57

And how much did it bring in in tourism.....

Notmoog · 22/11/2024 11:58

Sdpbody · 22/11/2024 11:57

And how much did it bring in in tourism.....

not as much as it cost......

OP posts:
Sdpbody · 22/11/2024 11:59

Of course it brought it more than it cost.

quantumbutterfly · 22/11/2024 12:00

BuzzieLittleBee · 22/11/2024 10:11

I don't have strong views on this one way or the other - but it equates to a little over £1 per head for everyone in the UK.
Or put another way, less than 0.05% of the money raised from VAT alone.
Or to compare it with another waste of money - around 0.1% of the estimated cost of HS2 (which will undoubtedly end up costing way more than the estimate)

So the headline figure might sound a lot, but it's a drop in the ocean really.

So a bit like a pyramid scheme?

Useofstirm · 22/11/2024 12:01

WinterIsNearlyHere · 22/11/2024 11:08

I don't think it's that much tbh, for this sort of event.

Also just read this:

Prior to the event, economic forecasters, the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR), had predicted a boost of £337m for the UK's economy due to the coronation - including £104m in extra pub spending and an estimated £223m spend from tourism to the UK during the period.
Hotel revenue was also said to be up by 54% compared to the same point in the previous year, while bookings for UK-bound flights for the coronation weekend jumped by 149% within 24 hours of the day being announced, according to TravelPort.
P

No one is answering this I see. As long as they bring in more than they cost I'm happy.

Notmoog · 22/11/2024 12:01

Sdpbody · 22/11/2024 11:59

Of course it brought it more than it cost.

It's always an estimate, or a guess. What makes you so confident?

OP posts:
beguilingeyes · 22/11/2024 12:04

Cynic17 · 22/11/2024 11:05

Frankly, a bargain. It's not even a particularly large amount. Most of it was security costs, protecting guests, world leaders etc. We have a monarchy, it costs us very little - but a presidency would probably be no different.

As a PP said, a President would have been elected. Not sitting under a gold hat because an ancester was more of a bastard than the other barons.
Cop a load of the country's biggest landowners. I'm starting to feel positively French about the whole thing. It's feudal and appalling.

https://www.countrylife.co.uk/country-life/who-owns-britain-top-ten-aristocratic-uk-landowners-20175

Who owns Britain: Top ten aristocratic UK landowners - Country Life

We identify the top ten aristocratic landowners in Britain today

https://www.countrylife.co.uk/country-life/who-owns-britain-top-ten-aristocratic-uk-landowners-20175

Puzzledandpissedoff · 22/11/2024 12:05

CathyorClaire · 22/11/2024 10:51

Also worth noting there's a royal veto over what can now be shown of the hat party on MSM including our own public service broadcaster:

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/may/05/revealed-royal-family-has-power-to-censor-bbc-coronation-coverage

Disgraceful.

Be fair Cathy; there's just a chance that some of the footage may have featured the few protesters he didn't manage to have arrested and we can't have that can we? Wink

All the talk about "slimming down the monarchy" ignores the fact that Charles was said to feel this way and that he made no actual comment himself - and even if that's what he wanted it would certainly have been for others but not him personally

quantumbutterfly · 22/11/2024 12:08

NetballHoop · 22/11/2024 09:56

Well Trump's inauguration was estimated to have cost between $175 million and $200 million so I'd say we got off lightly.

home.heinonline.org/blog/2017/01/the-extraordinary-cost-to-inaugurate-a-president/

If the population of USA is about 335 million (thanks google), that only makes it 60 cents a head, with the exchange rate on google today that's 48p, so less than half the price- bargain.

quantumbutterfly · 22/11/2024 12:09

Notmoog · 22/11/2024 10:30

this is what frustrates me.
An obscene amount of money wated and some people think it's fine because we overspend on other things or because the singing was nice.
Bread and circuses

You got bread?

quantumbutterfly · 22/11/2024 12:13

ReignOfError · 22/11/2024 11:13

It’s abysmal. And what’s that ‘once in a generation’ crap justification? The bloke was pushing 75 when he was crowned and is unlikely to live to 100. Sometime in the next ten a fifteen years, we will be expected to pay all over again for another funeral and an overblown outdated ceremony.

He talks a lot about environmental issues, I think he'd like to be composted.