Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

C5 Documentary: Harry and Meghan, Rise and Fall

1000 replies

IsoldeWagner · 18/08/2024 12:10

Anyone watching this? It's on My5. I thought the first episode was interesting. I was reminded of how popular they were and how much support they got.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
IsoldeWagner · 23/08/2024 11:15

Yes. I think it's excusable with public transport!
True, if an unavoidable delay is dealt with properly, with courtesy.

OP posts:
GiveMeSpanakopita · 23/08/2024 11:19

SmileyHappyPeopleInTheSun · 23/08/2024 09:57

Also, the whole “smear campaign” from the place ignores the obvious truth that the stories the papers were writing about - there were tensions behind the scenes

Right at height of Harry and Meghan popularity they were due to do a local visit coincidentally one of my kids was on school visits to same place - and the teachers were so excited - couple were very late so they missed them these thing happen but local rumours started form people there said they were late and very rude - you sort of shrug and get on with life - but when you start to see similar in newspaper at different events who start to be more included to not dismiss it even if you initially put it down to hiccups in arrangements.

Where as Queen - in population of 67 million she won't have met everyone - but my primary school in 80s worked out she had to pass out village between public engagements had us all turn out with flowers and despite huge security concerns at time - they stopped the car took the flowers and wrote to say thank you afterwards. All I saw was the black cars but parents and wider family feel but better disposed towards them afterwards. I heard similar positive stories from family friends who met Diana in crowds.

I know the press get blamed but there are local informal social networks that pass impressions on. I think celebs being dicks is more accepted even if frowned on because they are selling their talent - whereas RF is much more nebulous more wrapped up in culture, history and good works so feel good factor is more important.

Plus post split there are some many instances on camera where Meghan been rude - turning her back on school kids in Nigeria is one example.

I increasingly think Harry happy chappie persona was a cleaver PR stunt from palace PR people and he not like that at all and that's because of interviews he's given and a book he wrote.

I think celebs being dicks is more accepted even if frowned on because they are selling their talent

I don't think Meghan ever understood there's a difference between being a celebrity and being a Royal. Like, lots of differences actually, big ones.

I still don't think she understands it, tbh.

I don't blame her for this because the British Royal Family, despite its global fame, is very culturally bound to Britain in terms of expectations of behaviour, the 'done thing' etc. All bound up with cultural and class nuances that other countries don't have.

They are celebrities now, not Royals. I have no doubt that Megahn will fulfil this role very well, Harry not so sure if he wants it.

IsoldeWagner · 23/08/2024 11:23

To be fair, Meghan should have done her homework. Or listened to advice.

OP posts:
SmileyHappyPeopleInTheSun · 23/08/2024 11:33

I don't think Meghan ever understood there's a difference between being a celebrity and being a Royal. Like, lots of differences actually, big ones.

I agree - though also agree she was offered a huge amount of potential support and help from RF which she dismissed as unnecessary - the dossier she supposedly binned, Sophie - mentorships and that experienced equerry.

Even her staff who would have wanted her to succeed for their own careers seem to have been alienated with bullying. Post exit they still can't hold seem to hold on to staff.

Things like not knowing royal protocol or even the national anthem - google could have helped with if Harry couldn't.

Luddite26 · 23/08/2024 11:36

One of the biggest clangers imo and most telling of her personality was getting Harry to ring David Beckham with accusations of Victoria leaking stories.
I mean why did Harry then not say as if they would.
How embarrassing for Harry and that was that the end of that connection.

AutumnCrow · 23/08/2024 11:40

Likewhatever · 22/08/2024 22:45

I can see there being competition between William and Harry in terms of popularity because after all they’re only human. However the Sussexes’ moment in the spotlight was only ever going to be temporary, something Harry seems not to have understood. He still talks about their “platform”, as though it’s something they carry round with them. The truth is the platform was being a working royal and they stepped off it.

Edited

I think is an astute and interesting idea. Harry thinks 'the platform' is being a Prince.

If the King takes the 'Prince' title away, then Harry will simply switch to believing that 'the platform' is being the son of the King. And then, eventually, being the brother of the King. And eventually, as he enters old age, being the uncle of the King.

He is wedded not just to Meghan, but to words like 'birthright' and 'global' that have taken up residence in his head. If he actually believes this stuff, there's no helping him. He's like an addict - he'll have to hit rock bottom before he realises he needs help.

GiveMeSpanakopita · 23/08/2024 11:52

Galoop · 23/08/2024 02:32

Harry was always more popular than William, maybe because he was seen to be more cheeky and relative, and initially Meghan was too. They were definitely the more popular couple, so I wouldn't be surprised if there was a natural jealously. Kate seems lovely, but she's about as interesting as cardboard

Kate seems lovely, but she's about as interesting as cardboard

This sentence is interesting because it strikes right at the heart of the difference between royals and celebrities, which I was talking about upthread.

I don't WANT my royals to be especially interesting. I want them, by their presence and patronage, to shine a light on interesting things done and experienced by ORDINARY PEOPLE.

See when Camilla goes to visit a DV charity or Kate does a thing on mental health, I don't want to hear their experiences and thoughts on these issues. I want them to shine a light on the work being done by the people they're visiting.

Same with the Queen, I knew eff all about her really but she visited places and people and charities that it was useful for me as a citizen to know about.

That is the function of the royal family, they are vessels and platforms for other people. That is the point of them and that is what Meghan doesn't understand, imho. She thought everyone wanted to hear all about HER and her issues and whether SHE was all right and how SHE was feeling. They didn't, because they don't. They wanted to hear about the causes she was espousing.

Serenster · 23/08/2024 11:56

As Queen Mary apparently once said to a relative “You are a member of the British Royal family. We are never tired, and we all love hospitals.” 🤣

Luddite26 · 23/08/2024 12:02

AutumnCrow · 23/08/2024 11:40

I think is an astute and interesting idea. Harry thinks 'the platform' is being a Prince.

If the King takes the 'Prince' title away, then Harry will simply switch to believing that 'the platform' is being the son of the King. And then, eventually, being the brother of the King. And eventually, as he enters old age, being the uncle of the King.

He is wedded not just to Meghan, but to words like 'birthright' and 'global' that have taken up residence in his head. If he actually believes this stuff, there's no helping him. He's like an addict - he'll have to hit rock bottom before he realises he needs help.

It all sounds a bit Lion King!

IsoldeWagner · 23/08/2024 12:16

Luddite26 · 23/08/2024 11:36

One of the biggest clangers imo and most telling of her personality was getting Harry to ring David Beckham with accusations of Victoria leaking stories.
I mean why did Harry then not say as if they would.
How embarrassing for Harry and that was that the end of that connection.

How hypocritical. They're the ones leaking stories.

OP posts:
IsoldeWagner · 23/08/2024 12:17

Serenster · 23/08/2024 11:56

As Queen Mary apparently once said to a relative “You are a member of the British Royal family. We are never tired, and we all love hospitals.” 🤣

Brilliant. She was a character!

OP posts:
Thedom · 23/08/2024 12:30

I don't think Meghan ever understood there's a difference between being a celebrity and being a Royal. Like, lots of differences actually, big ones.

Meghan and her VP 'fan' don't think much of Harrys' royal presence either, hard to believe he was relegated to the butt-end of a table at a luncheon supposedly in their honour. Even the VP's boyfriend got a place at the top table.

C5 Documentary: Harry and Meghan, Rise and Fall
C5 Documentary: Harry and Meghan, Rise and Fall
LaMarschallin · 23/08/2024 12:53

Luddite26 · 23/08/2024 08:20

@LaMarschallin oh that's a shame you find star signs meaningless. It's definitely not the trait of a Scorpio which of course is King Charles' star sign!

Ah, no, don't worry - it's not that much of a shame. I struggle on without them.

It's definitely not the trait of a Scorpio which of course is King Charles' star sign!
Mine too. So I'm not sure what that tells us.
The "!" at the end of your sentence suggests you think you've made a good point or a joke. Or both, maybe.
I'm afraid I'm missing it/them.

upinaballoon · 23/08/2024 13:17

Serenster · 23/08/2024 11:56

As Queen Mary apparently once said to a relative “You are a member of the British Royal family. We are never tired, and we all love hospitals.” 🤣

I was thinking exactly that when I read @GiveMeSpanakopita 's post before yours.

Luddite26 · 23/08/2024 13:18

Oh not at al, no good point or joke.

coolmum123 · 23/08/2024 13:20

Luddite26 · 23/08/2024 11:36

One of the biggest clangers imo and most telling of her personality was getting Harry to ring David Beckham with accusations of Victoria leaking stories.
I mean why did Harry then not say as if they would.
How embarrassing for Harry and that was that the end of that connection.

She was probably on the floor sobbing about it so Harry had no choice but to call. She really has him in her pocket. You know he reallyist not have thought much of his family to have so quickly turned against them though.

Manypaws · 23/08/2024 13:24

Thedom · 23/08/2024 12:30

I don't think Meghan ever understood there's a difference between being a celebrity and being a Royal. Like, lots of differences actually, big ones.

Meghan and her VP 'fan' don't think much of Harrys' royal presence either, hard to believe he was relegated to the butt-end of a table at a luncheon supposedly in their honour. Even the VP's boyfriend got a place at the top table.

She had to fit his high chair in

GiveMeSpanakopita · 23/08/2024 13:26

coolmum123 · 23/08/2024 13:20

She was probably on the floor sobbing about it so Harry had no choice but to call. She really has him in her pocket. You know he reallyist not have thought much of his family to have so quickly turned against them though.

Hehe, you know one thing that stood out to me from Harry's book (yes I did read it - stood in Waterstones for a couple of hours and speed read) was Meghan's odd habit of always 'crumpling to the floor in tears', 'sliding down the wall with a wail' or being found 'slumped on the floor crying'.

I never knew there was such a strong physical correlation between emotion and the exertion of gravity, outside of bad edwardian melodramas that is.

I've had my fair share of terrible news and terrifying moments of high emotion but I've never crumpled to the floor to cry. Sat on the sofa or gone to lay on my bed, yes. Slid down the wall wailing, no.

I suppose I'm not as sensitive a soul as Meghan is.

upinaballoon · 23/08/2024 13:29

What did Harry want? He wanted to get away from the 'toxic' press. He felt he must get away so he could keep his family safe - is that what he told Oprah or Tom Bradby or Someone?

What else did he want for his future life? I wonder what he envisaged. Maybe he didn't think far ahead at the time. I don't suppose he's the first person to 'run away' without thinking too much about what would happen when he got 'there'.

Luddite26 · 23/08/2024 13:38

Of course Meghan is a Leo.

WinnieTheW0rm · 23/08/2024 13:38

upinaballoon · 23/08/2024 13:29

What did Harry want? He wanted to get away from the 'toxic' press. He felt he must get away so he could keep his family safe - is that what he told Oprah or Tom Bradby or Someone?

What else did he want for his future life? I wonder what he envisaged. Maybe he didn't think far ahead at the time. I don't suppose he's the first person to 'run away' without thinking too much about what would happen when he got 'there'.

He wanted "half in, half out"

When that was roundly rejected, he was painted in to a corner because it was all played out semi-publicly
(remember they announced it because they feared a leak - I wonder if "publish and be damned" would have served them better at that stage because a) it might not have come out at all, b) it might not have come out for a while, allowing for their opening shot to have been rejected in private, giving them different options, c) assuming it did come out, they could have made a statement about how disappointed they were to find their private and personal plans and the confidential Palace negotiations had found their way into the public domain)

And so they had no time to regroup, and were disinclined to alter the framework they had pre-emptively made public, and I think they did have to wing it. Then were completely shafted by a factor beyond anyone's control (arrival of the pandemic) which meant everything public facing lost momentum. By the time they could go out in California, they weren't the new hot ticket, they were old news.

Luddite26 · 23/08/2024 13:47

And very uninterstingly Meghan shares her birthday with the Late Queen Mum. Born 81 years after Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon. That surely would have sealed her love in the RF.

PigglyWigglyOhYeah · 23/08/2024 13:54

Why is there all this astrology shite being mentioned on this thread? Catherine is a nice person because she has been properly brought up. Meghan is unpleasant because she wasn't properly brought up. It's got bugger all to do with whether you were born on a Tuesday in February when the porridge is stirred widdershins with a goat's leg and the moon is waxing in Neptune, or whatever.

Luddite26 · 23/08/2024 13:56

I apologise.

CoffeeCantata · 23/08/2024 14:01

Picking up on the idea that Meghan always spurns advice - and comes to grief as a result - I think she also fails to either understand or acknowledge how much of a leg-up she's had in her life, especially from her estranged father.

Meghan clearly thinks she's very special, but so much of her success in life came about due to 'who she knew', usually male family members. The much-retold washing-up liquid story isn't what it seems. Her whole class were shown the ad and given the task of critiquing it and writing to P & G. Meghan's father (a film industry professional) latched on to this and made a film in the classroom, getting his darling daughter to speak and showing/reading her letter. In her mind this has become quite a different story.

He also gave her an important entree into the acting world, and it was through her uncle (not sure on which side of the family) that she got her much-vaunted internship in Argentina.

But either Meghan didn't understand that she'd been given nepotistic help here, or she's conveniently forgotten it. I expect this is partly why these family members have been cut off - they know too much!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.