Netflix Billionaire Boss Backs Meghan

[DingDingaling]

https://www.gbnews.com/royal/prince-harry-meghan-markle-netflix-chief-four-new-projects

Considering the praise the couple received do you think they will have success with the new projects?

@Tizzwazz I wrote that the list of their achievements was mostly opinion, that we don’t know about their finances and the projects are not appearing to manifest. Your @DingDingaling started talking about “minds” and garbage. That’s not responding in kind. Not a big gotchya, either.

🤷‍♀️

My view of Harry and Meghan is that they are floundering and making fools of themselves. It’s widely shared and has been for years now.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/03/meghan-and-diana-could-have-saved-royal-family/618318/

It’s very sad, ironic and sometimes even hypocritical that some posters resort to personal insults. Posting that posters on this thread are lazy and closed minded is unnecessary and rude as well as not being at all the case or at all true. Just because, they don’t agree with you that Meghan is a saint and is only to be worshiped.
You are so blinded by your adoration.
Posters on here, have well thought out and evidence based opinions and debate points. You are getting personal because there is no evidence to back up your OP and your arguments are not withstanding scrutiny.

I totally agree. Not all on here do but that’s absolutely fine. I have more class and respect for others than to get personal about those who don’t agree.

I have formed the opinions that I have, by listening and watching the Sussexes.
I am entitled to my opinion without being insulted or harassed because of it. I am not being hateful in my posts, yet have been mocked on this thread simply for being informative, when a source was demanded from me and I simply provided a link. (I thought I was being helpful yet this the response was ‘wow! You’re dedicated!’)

It’s really not ok. Do better.

I think you have the wrong poster.
I am agreeing with you.

Oh I know! Apologies if I wasn’t making it clear that I was aiming the second longer part of my post to others…..💗

I also think the faux concerned advice given by unknown posters is a laugh. “Think about what you are posting and why”.

It reminds me of the random stray men who give women unsolicited advice in public. I just want to say, “Dude, I don’t know you. You need to build some credibility of your own before people will pay attention to your directives. Also, zip up your trousers there and wipe off your face.”

I see the tag team have arrived 😆

@smilesy I could come up with better talking points in favor of H&M myself. In fact, they should hire me.

Ooooh, educate yourself, AliceOlive! 😂

And then they were gone, together at the same time…..

I think they find it frustrating that not everyone shares their blind and unconditional devotion.

😂😂😂

I think by balanced view they mean like this:

“Harry is awesome, and Meghan is equally awesome.”

Great one!! Need to remember that

If I'm not mistaken this is called the "Royal Family Forum" yet half the posts concern Harry and Meghan - as the late great Telegraph editor, Bill Deedes' was won't to say "shurely shome mishtake" !!

No worries x

Well, what else would you like to talk about then? nothing much happening with the RF at the moment, so we're scraping the barrel to find topics. Given that they've just completed a 'quasi royal' tour of Nigeria, and by complaining that his family aren't appreciative of his efforts Harry appears to think that he's back in the RF, what's wrong with talking about them?

And Meghan is allegedly writing to emperors using pseudo-royal letterhead.

That’s because they are always up to something! There’s so much to discuss.

The grift that keeps on giving! 😆

Removing this as I shouldn’t post on two threads. But it’s the Atlantic article and it’s fascinating in retrospect.

shurely shome mishtake?

Nah.

As everyone keeps saying, Prince Harry is royal.

He just isn’t a working royal - although you would be forgiven for thinking that he was the way he gads about.

Shometimes it is shenshible not to be a shnidey sharcastic bashtard when there ish no shubshtance to your argument. For you may make yourshelf look like someone arguing shimply for the shake of it.

Shometimes it is shenshible not to be a shnidey sharcastic bashtard when there ish no shubshtance to your argument. For you may make yourshelf look like someone arguing shimply for the shake of it

Or sounding - to use favourite MN terms - disingenuous and faux naive.

I've seen disingenuous used more in two years on here than I have in pretty much my entire life.

@Tizzwazz

This was a good read.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Meghan-Misunderstood-Sean-Smith/dp/0008359571

By being open-minded do you mean continually wiping the slate clean so each new misstep is considered in isolation? That not being open minded. It ms sounds more like cognitive bias.

In the case of Meghan and Harry I think past performance is very much indicative of future performance, as has been demonstrated for several years now.

@DingDingaling

Thanks! 😊