Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

I feel really sorry for William

195 replies

ssd · 27/03/2024 11:04

I'm not usually a fan , but I've been thinking about William. He must be absolutely reeling. His dad and his wife both have cancer. He doesn't talk to his brother and his mum died when he was young. I can't imagine the turmoil he is in, i hope he has good friends around him.

OP posts:
doublec · 28/03/2024 05:39

OriginalStarWars · 28/03/2024 00:52

"On discovering cancer was present following her surgery, the decision will have been taken to give the princess chemo to make sure any lingering cancerous cells are killed.
"Surgery is the most curative form of treatment for early-stage cancers of solid organs.
"However, occasionally some cancer cells escape the organ of their origin and start residing in other organs such as the lung or liver.
"Tests and scans currently available are unable to detect such microscopic spread and therefore to improve chances of cure, presumptive treatment of such likely spread is often undertaken even after the cancer in the solid organ of origin is completely removed.
"Depending on the type of cancer, a range of drugs that can reach all organs of the body where such spread might have occurred are used.
"Chemotherapy is one such type of treatment that uses drugs which particularly act on rapidly dividing cells, for example, cancer cells, and kills such cells.""

https://news.sky.com/story/what-is-preventative-chemotherapy-experts-explain-treatment-and-when-its-used-13100076

Stop being so bloody obtuse.

That article is trying (and failing in my opinion) to gloss over things. But it seems that you prefer others to take it at face value.

Read between the lines of that article and take heed, for once and for all - chemo isn't given to those who don't need it. In truth, there is no such thing as preventative chemo. Chemo is chemo is chemo.

Oh, and in response to your earlier statement:

But a healthy young woman having preventative chemo should recover.
I do not understand why so many of you are talking as if she is going to die?

I am a healthy young woman (under 50) with a cancer. I was given chemotherapy because there's a very real chance it will return either the form of a new primary, or secondary. It might not be today, tomorrow or a few years time, but there's every chance it could, or it might not. No-one can predict, this is the issue with cancer and what they're trying to say. It's not about dying, plenty of people live for years with cancer, even terminal ones. This is something anyone who has been treated for cancer will fear, its possible and in many cases, inevitable return.

Unfortunately, this could be a very real thing for PoW too, she is a mortal after all. Also, you have to take into account there might be something in her genomic essay that has added to the decision to give her chemo.

We just don't know. What I do know is that the only thing harder than being treated for cancer is watching one's loved ones going through cancer and its treatment themselves. (And I say this having lost both my parents to cancer, one when I was still a teen). I feel for anyone who is the same position as William. Money and status doesn't buy everything or peace of mind, even at times like this. All you can do is hope for the best, and have all the support you and your loved ones need.

FrancisSeaton · 28/03/2024 11:08

All the money and riches in the world sadly can't prevent tragedy and he (and let's not forget his brother) have been no stranger to that.
The queen seemed like such a stable influence amidst all the chaos

Puzzledandpissedoff · 28/03/2024 11:43

I just can't see how He Sophie and Ed can do everything that a decade or so ago was done by about 10 senior Royals plus the work of the Kents and Gloucesters

He doesn't actually need to though

Obviously Covid was a very unusual period, but as we saw then the sky doesn't fall if they're not opening things and visiting things all the time, and if we have to have a monarchy at all I see nothing wrong with them being a sort of "background" thing, rolled out only for the really big occasions - especially if we could have a proper review of their actual value to match

Granted it would upset those who like to coo over the clothes and fantasise over what each gesture might mean, but other high profilers are available and at least many of them hold no power over us all

Dolma · 28/03/2024 11:44

OriginalStarWars · 28/03/2024 00:28

I have had multiple friends and family with cancer, some have died and some have survived. I am not downplaying it but I understand what preventative chemo means and the difference between a healthy young woman receiving this, and an older person with other health problems.
I have strong opinions on cancer because I know too much about it. I am always aware when people talk about a famous person having cancer and posting misinformation that other people who have cancer or their family and friends will be reading it. If only people in the RF section could read the thread I would not care. But it appeared in trending.
You may not care about cancer misinformation being posted, I do. It has real life consequences.

You really have some nerve in telling others that they are spreading misinformation when you are talking absolute nonsense.

Preventative chemotherapy is only given to patients with aggressive or high risk cancer (and younger patients are more likely to have aggressive disease). It helps reduce the risk of an occurrence but it certainly doesn't offer a cure.

We don't know what type of cancer Kate has, but using breast cancer as an example, around a third of women treated with preventative chemo will still progress to stage 4 and then die. I don't know where you got the idea that a patient who has had preventative chemo has to be unlucky to then relapse, but you are talking out of your arse.

Uricon2 · 28/03/2024 12:24

I don't think anyone is wishing anything other than a rapid and full recovery for Kate, but the truth is what's happened to her isn't good and there's no way of glossing it as such.

I feel incredibly sorry for William, as a son, husband and father, for all the reasons others have written about upthread. He'd have to be a machine not to be affected by all that is going on and I hope he's getting plenty of support as well as giving it.

meercat23 · 28/03/2024 12:50

Dolma · 28/03/2024 11:44

You really have some nerve in telling others that they are spreading misinformation when you are talking absolute nonsense.

Preventative chemotherapy is only given to patients with aggressive or high risk cancer (and younger patients are more likely to have aggressive disease). It helps reduce the risk of an occurrence but it certainly doesn't offer a cure.

We don't know what type of cancer Kate has, but using breast cancer as an example, around a third of women treated with preventative chemo will still progress to stage 4 and then die. I don't know where you got the idea that a patient who has had preventative chemo has to be unlucky to then relapse, but you are talking out of your arse.

I think you are not entirely right about the situations in which preventative/adjuvant chemotherapy is used.

I had surgery for a stage 2 breast cancer which had not spread to the lymph nodes. The surgeon told me he was confident it had all been removed but that adjuvant therapy would be offered to be sure.

I was given chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

My cancer was not classified as very advanced or very aggressive.

As some one said up thread. Cancer is complex and treatments are constantly developing. We have no idea of the kind of cancer the PoW had but the fact that she is receiving preventative chemo does not necessarily mean that it was advanced or aggressive.

Janehasamane · 28/03/2024 12:56

Dolma · 28/03/2024 11:44

You really have some nerve in telling others that they are spreading misinformation when you are talking absolute nonsense.

Preventative chemotherapy is only given to patients with aggressive or high risk cancer (and younger patients are more likely to have aggressive disease). It helps reduce the risk of an occurrence but it certainly doesn't offer a cure.

We don't know what type of cancer Kate has, but using breast cancer as an example, around a third of women treated with preventative chemo will still progress to stage 4 and then die. I don't know where you got the idea that a patient who has had preventative chemo has to be unlucky to then relapse, but you are talking out of your arse.

I googled ans this appears correct. I was wondering as the way it was presented I understood her to be cancer free, and this was to kill off any tiny cells they couldn’t see but might be lingering. A tough time ahead but a recovery pathway. Part of me was thinking Kate wasn’t talking like a cancer free patient where it was caught early and successfully removed. Even her family, her brother, we will climb the mountain together stuff,did make me concerned.

Tcateh · 28/03/2024 12:57

I was also thinking the same late last night despite not being a news follower or that interested in the royal family.

He'd be very alone immediate family wise should the worst happen.

Very sad.

Dolma · 28/03/2024 13:56

meercat23 · 28/03/2024 12:50

I think you are not entirely right about the situations in which preventative/adjuvant chemotherapy is used.

I had surgery for a stage 2 breast cancer which had not spread to the lymph nodes. The surgeon told me he was confident it had all been removed but that adjuvant therapy would be offered to be sure.

I was given chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

My cancer was not classified as very advanced or very aggressive.

As some one said up thread. Cancer is complex and treatments are constantly developing. We have no idea of the kind of cancer the PoW had but the fact that she is receiving preventative chemo does not necessarily mean that it was advanced or aggressive.

But it does mean that it is considered high enough risk that the benefits of chemo outweigh the downsides. Chemo has a nasty habit of causing things like heart failure - doctors don't give adjuvant chemo unless the risk to life really warrants it.

Stage 2 breast cancer is high enough risk of recurrence for chemotherapy to be warranted, in most cases.

musthorse · 28/03/2024 16:20

I'm amazed at the people discussing this and that in relation to cancer. I find it distasteful to be honest. Everyone's experiences are different. Every case is different. It is ghoulish to discuss what it might mean first to Kate or her family when no one knows except who needs to. I was sad to hear she had cancer - even though I do not know her personally - but do not feel the need to guess as to what type or stage. There is no point in me saying well I know x number of people who have had cancer and only x out of them are still alive. We all have horror or supportive stories. What is to be gained by this discussion? I would really love to know what people gain from surmising and guessing about someone's health.

Dollenganger333 · 28/03/2024 16:26

musthorse · 28/03/2024 16:20

I'm amazed at the people discussing this and that in relation to cancer. I find it distasteful to be honest. Everyone's experiences are different. Every case is different. It is ghoulish to discuss what it might mean first to Kate or her family when no one knows except who needs to. I was sad to hear she had cancer - even though I do not know her personally - but do not feel the need to guess as to what type or stage. There is no point in me saying well I know x number of people who have had cancer and only x out of them are still alive. We all have horror or supportive stories. What is to be gained by this discussion? I would really love to know what people gain from surmising and guessing about someone's health.

Well that's the thing about freedom of speech. Why are you policing a discussion forum?

musthorse · 28/03/2024 16:39

@Dollenganger333 no policing here. I asked a question.

Dollenganger333 · 28/03/2024 16:56

Ok, well my take on it is that people discuss it because they relate.

OooScotland · 28/03/2024 17:00

musthorse · 28/03/2024 16:20

I'm amazed at the people discussing this and that in relation to cancer. I find it distasteful to be honest. Everyone's experiences are different. Every case is different. It is ghoulish to discuss what it might mean first to Kate or her family when no one knows except who needs to. I was sad to hear she had cancer - even though I do not know her personally - but do not feel the need to guess as to what type or stage. There is no point in me saying well I know x number of people who have had cancer and only x out of them are still alive. We all have horror or supportive stories. What is to be gained by this discussion? I would really love to know what people gain from surmising and guessing about someone's health.

We gain nothing. We discuss it because its human nature to do so.

Hughs · 28/03/2024 17:52

@musthorse
I think talk of stages etc stemmed from a pp who couldn't understand why people were expressing sympathy because "Kate told us in her video she has had cancer and is having preventative chemo. That means we know her prognosis." (We don't.) And "Kate is having preventative chemo. That is not a life threatening situation."

Other pps then explained why it's not quite that simple.

doublec · 28/03/2024 18:13

meercat23 · 28/03/2024 12:50

I think you are not entirely right about the situations in which preventative/adjuvant chemotherapy is used.

I had surgery for a stage 2 breast cancer which had not spread to the lymph nodes. The surgeon told me he was confident it had all been removed but that adjuvant therapy would be offered to be sure.

I was given chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

My cancer was not classified as very advanced or very aggressive.

As some one said up thread. Cancer is complex and treatments are constantly developing. We have no idea of the kind of cancer the PoW had but the fact that she is receiving preventative chemo does not necessarily mean that it was advanced or aggressive.

Am curious. What grade was your cancer?

A stage 2 breast cancer is aggressive because it is not a DCIS. I too had a stage 2 IDC. What was feeding it? ER/PR+, HER2+ ( as you had chemo after surgery, am pretty sure it wasn't triple negative). If it was ER/PR+, was your tissue sent for oncotyping? Or do you have any genetic mutations. Lots of questions but these are all taken into account when giving chemo for breast cancer. Sometimes, even just having a stage 2 cancer (even with no spread) can call for chemo because during the time a cancer has grown to 20-50mm (the size parameters for stage 2), it will have been there long enough for there to be a real probability some cells have shed and circulated elsewhere.

Breast cancer also has a huge risk of recurrence, either as a secondary or a new primary. If there wasn't this risk, they would rely on surgery, radiotherapy, and where needed, hormone or immuntherapy alone. (Disregarding triple negative which has to be treated with chemo).

The thing is though, PoW does not have breast cancer, so none of this, particularly your treatment and chemo, has any relevance on her and her treatment/why she is being given chemo.

And this is what I was trying to stress in previous posts. No-one's cancer (or treatment) has any real relevance on anyone else's.

Like @musthorse, I can't quite believe people are discussing this to the extent they are. Just it alone. It's not for us to speculate, more so as they've made it quite clear they do not want to talk about the details. PoW is having chemotherapy. Leave it that.

And no, am not policing anyone on here (before I am accused of that). But come on, you really don't have anything more interesting to talk about than speculate on someone's health?

LiesDoNotBecomeUs · 28/03/2024 18:34

myrtleWilson · 27/03/2024 19:55

@OriginalStarWars Diana, like all of us was a complex individual. She was, I believe, damaged by many many people during her life, she was also adored by many people during her life. She did amazing things for many causes and also some horrible acts that hurt others deeply.

That complexity, augmented by the nature of her death is rooted in her children (and probably Charles and others close to her) I don't think this thread is trashing her but acknowledging that the positives she gave her children (thinking of others through visits to homeless shelters as just one example) is inevitably balanced to a greater or lesser degree by the negative exposures she gave them. Her children appear to share similar 'blends' of her - both H&M and W&K have spoken about talking to their children about issues around homelessness for example, both H&W have justified but possibly heightened distrust of many forms of media, both H&W speak about the value of good mental health support and probably feel a sense of anxiety about their ability to be 'in control' given the public roles they have/had.

This, of course, isn't limited to Diana - we could have a similar conversation about the impact of bullying/isolation Charles felt as he was packed off to school in Scotland.

As Larkin said - a human experience...

"They fuck you up, your mum and dad
They may not mean to, but they do
They fill you with the faults they had
And add some extra, just for you

But they were fucked up in their turn
By fools in old style hats and coats
Who half the time were soppy-stern
And half at one anothers throats

Man hands on misery to man
It deepens like a coastal shelf
get out as early as you can
And don't have any kids yourself

Except of course, we all hope we can do the work to not fuck up the next lot coming up after us.

PS - thank you for the messages about my sister - it was a few years ago now - however, sometimes things hit differently don't they.

Off the point a bit (sorry) but though I love his poems, Larkin was a bit of curmudgeon!

Adrian Mitchell wrote this lovely response after a mishearing of that Larkin poem: :)

This Be the Worst

They tuck you up, your mum and dad,
They read you Peter Rabbit, too.
They give you all the treats they had
And add some extra, just for you.

They were tucked up when they were small,
(Pink perfume, blue tobacco-smoke),
By those whose kiss healed any fall,
Whose laughter doubled any joke.

Man hands on happiness to man,
It deepens like a coastal shelf.
So love your parents all you can
And have some cheerful kids yourself.

Runnerinthenight · 28/03/2024 20:07

OriginalStarWars · 27/03/2024 22:03

He did take time off and at short notice said he could not attend the memorial where he was going to do a reading. So it is false to say he can not take a day off sick, he can and does.

It's out of character, and look at the rumours it caused!

HeddaGarbled · 28/03/2024 20:21

I would really love to know what people gain from surmising and guessing about someone's health

That’s not exactly what is happening here. Someone implied that there’s no need to feel sorry for William because his wife is going to be fine, and some posters have disputed whether that’s a given.

This inevitably leads to some discussion of cancer treatments, prognoses and personal experiences.

Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar · 28/03/2024 20:30

Runnerinthenight · 28/03/2024 20:07

It's out of character, and look at the rumours it caused!

Absolutely. It was the day Catherine got her cancer diagnosis. Would anyone posting here have wanted to try to keep it together reading at a funeral when you have just found out your significant other and parent to your young children had learned they had cancer? Bear in mind that the other members of the family at the service would not have known about the diagnosis. William would have had to lead them all and try to keep it together. Nobody has a right to judge him for dropping out. The memorial was a private family event. The nosiness of reporters and members of the public did not make that service a public event.

Quizine · 28/03/2024 20:41

The parents in law of the poor guy who shot himself were at the memorial. But you are right, W getting that shock news and racing home prior to the service at which he was to play a big part is totally and completely understandable.

It's just that at the time rumours were flying around due to the lack of information and people put two and two together to make a hundred.

looknicejackie · 28/03/2024 20:46

musthorse · 28/03/2024 16:20

I'm amazed at the people discussing this and that in relation to cancer. I find it distasteful to be honest. Everyone's experiences are different. Every case is different. It is ghoulish to discuss what it might mean first to Kate or her family when no one knows except who needs to. I was sad to hear she had cancer - even though I do not know her personally - but do not feel the need to guess as to what type or stage. There is no point in me saying well I know x number of people who have had cancer and only x out of them are still alive. We all have horror or supportive stories. What is to be gained by this discussion? I would really love to know what people gain from surmising and guessing about someone's health.

The thread is about whether people feel sorry for William, acknowledging that he has faced and continues to face an especially challenging set of circumstances.

Most people are not speculating about the variety of cancer or being ghoulish, yet some posters seem determined that there is nothing to see here as it's "just" preventative chemotherapy.

It isn't being ghoulish to remind people that no one has chemotherapy for shits and giggles.

I have at most a mild interest in the Royals and would prefer a more equal society but I absolutely do feel empathy for them as a family right now.

ssd · 28/03/2024 22:30

Just seen Charles on the news. He doesn't look well at all.

OP posts:
Theraininspainfalls · 28/03/2024 22:31

ssd · 28/03/2024 22:30

Just seen Charles on the news. He doesn't look well at all.

No he really doesn’t. We would never know if the prognosis for either Charles or Kate isn’t as good as they are suggesting it is.

Salemforcuddles · 28/03/2024 22:51

I thought he looked so like his father, I agree he doesn't look good