Why don't the Sussex haters be more like Kate

[Thegrassneedsmowing]

She's admired for her grace, strength and stoicism. Yet her supporters spew bile over H&M, Obie Scobie (or whatever he's called) and their other high profile supporters.

I don't like the way H&M have behaved towards the RF but now they're living thousands of miles away, not costing the British taxpayer a bean ... I just don't care what they do.

But the hate they inspire on this forum (couldn't sleep last night so was reading a couple of threads) is unhinged.

Why not keep it classy like Kate? Ignore em and put all that misplaced energy into living your best life (as they say)?

Precisely my point. William, now in his 40s, failed to demonstrate the foresight needed to mend fences with his brother early on. This oversight means he's now without that additional support and camaraderie that would be invaluable, especially as he prepares for his future role as king and in difficult times i.e. illness.

This is what I meant about squads being dangerous. Some posters seem to think they are fighting some noble crusade for truth and justice on behalf of some very wealthy, privileged people (H&M) and every time they get push back or a reality check they just become more radicalised.

Would probably be best just to let the whole things drop now before these people loose their entire lives to being a keyboard warrior.

William does not need the "cameraderie" of a person who would betray him for money.

Prince Harry is an admitted drug user. A current drug user. Of serious drugs. No other person would be deemed fit to rejoin the RF, carry out public duties, or, god forbid, have any say in matters that concern the state with that sort of history. So why should Harry be the exception? He has never demonstrated any exceptional levels of intelligence, leadership or fortitude. He's always been the "party prince". So why on earth would the RF be better off with him rejoining them now?

@Ratsoffasinkingsauage Is this what you mean then?
People think they are actually part of the RF. This forum is quite toxic when it comes to the RF.

So Harry is a current user? How low can you stoop? What a dangerous claim.

William has the support and camaraderie of his father, step mother, Camilla, Aunt Anne, Uncle Timothy, Uncle Edward, Aunt Sophie, Cousin Zara, her husband Mike, his inlaws the Middletons, his mother's family, the Spencers, the wider family of dukes, duchesses, and cousins/great cousins, his group of friends, palace advisors, great swathes of the British public (whether you like it or not), the heads of the organisations/causes he champions. His brother is not a support, he's been nothing but a liability that has needed careful handling from a young age.

It's not my claim, it's his! Didn't you read his book or listen to his interviews?

@eise - have you read "Spare". Harry has shared many details of his drug use. When Meghan was in labour, for example, finishing off her canister of gas and air, (great birth partner) mushrooms (interesting episode) and regularly having a spliff when Meghan and the LO are in bed. This is a man with a certain lifestyle.

H&M friendly publication for you @Eise

https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2023/03/prince-harry-psychedelics-fundamental-part-life-mental-health-gabor-mate-spare-memoir

Explains his encounter with the kitchen bin.

Frankly the kitchen bin would be more help to William right now than his brother.

At least kitchen bins are useful! They don't talk complete cobblers and make a career out of victimhood.

@eise I’m only going to address one post to you because otherwise we’ll be here all day and I have better things to do.

Why do you rise to the bait all the time? Why do you feel the need to feed the discord and disagreement. You spend a lot of time on these threads. Is it worth such big chunks of your life?

I’m out with family for the rest of the day. Perhaps think about having a break.

Katesquad???
Is this meant to be an insult?
Is it supposed to be the opposite of Sussex squad?
Well I'm not offended! Bring it on , it obviously means courage under extreme pressure, grace when faced with bad news , loving mother to children and fabulous hair!!
I'm in!

Yes, "Katesquad" isn't really the insult it was intended to be, given the immense grace under pressure Catherine has displayed. And given she has a serious condition, belittling support for her in this manner is distasteful to say the least.

This has got to be one of the funniest posts I've ever read, a good wind up on a cold and wet Monday morning

Not keen on the misogyny though

Quite @Mymilkshakebringsallthepapstomycar , I'm definitely hoping for the hair and height as a bonus for joining though! 😌

I personally think they are still costing us money with the court case around security.

This is an excellent and often overlooked point.

Glad you are owning it now, it's the first step to change

Not keen on the misogyny though

Quite @Salemforcuddles . Apparently blaming Catherine for William's perceived failings are legitimate to this poster, but I am sure blaming Meghan for Harry's very real failings would be met with protest - and for good reason. For the record, Meghan is only responsible for her own actions, not her husband's. Suggesting Catherine is responsible is pure misogyny.

Do you like Christopher Bouzy, @eise ? He seems a man of principle and warmth…

It's no insult, you are the Katesquad - own it. You wouldn't be happy if they ever reconciled as you would run out of negative things to post.