Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

THE TIMES: Where is Kate? The royal family attracts more speculation by the day

1000 replies

TallerSally · 09/03/2024 10:11

On today's front page, the Times' Kate Mansey reports on the contrasting approaches taken by KP and BP's comms teams in their handling of the extraordinary situation the RF's currently in. It kicks off with the current host of the US's Daily Show (formerly hosted by the formidable Jon Stewart) asking some questions:

"While the King hosted friends and met world leaders, the Palace’s reluctance to comment on the Princess of Wales’s condition has created a rising sense of panic
One of America’s most popular TV comedy programmes was asking the question that had captured the nation. It was not about the Super Tuesday primary contests ahead of the US elections, or the State of the Union address, which elicited an exaggerated yawn from the presenter.

Instead, The Daily Show’s Ronny Chieng turned to look straight into the camera to ask: “Where is Kate Middleton? Where are you, Kate?”

There was no rush to provide reassurance this week from the Prince of Wales, who appeared to begin his working week on Friday with a visit to the Oval cricket ground for his Earthshot environmental campaign. Aides said that William had been busy all week, just not in a way that was visible to the public.

The King was doing the opposite. Away from public duties on doctors’ orders while he undergoes cancer treatment, the monarch had been expected to take this week as scheduled time off. Despite being told to “slow down” by the Queen, who took her own advice and flew to sunnier climes for a few days of relaxation, the King was ramping up.

He was photographed meeting world leaders and ambassadors from his living room at Buckingham Palace. Away from the cameras, he hosted friends who rallied round for afternoon tea and dinner dates. He insisted on the “more public” option of travelling between Buckingham Palace and his more comfortable private quarters at Clarence House in the State Bentley, so that he could “be seen”. Quite what the Queen made of it all from her sun lounger is anyone’s guess, but there are those in the palace who have an idea."

A tongue-in-cheek piece, but raises some interesting questions: have KP messed up the comms around Kate? and William? What is really going on with them? Why is the Royal family-funding public kept in the dark for so long, when usually not a couple of days go by without us having some nicely staged photo of some kind from Kensington Palace?

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/where-is-kate-prince-william-king-charles-cancer-khktpx9bm

Where is Kate? The royal family attracts more speculation by the day

While the King hosted friends and met world leaders, the Palace’s reluctance to comment on the Princess of Wales’s condition has created a rising sense of panic

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/where-is-kate-prince-william-king-charles-cancer-khktpx9bm

OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
Chupacabara · 11/03/2024 18:56

Does Harry photoshop a lot?

THE TIMES: Where is Kate? The royal family attracts more speculation by the day
MaturingCheeseball · 11/03/2024 18:57

@Grosshesselohe - I’ll give you public thanks!

ArcaneWireless · 11/03/2024 18:58

Aye. I will too. 👏🏽

AliceOlive · 11/03/2024 18:59
Billy Crystal Crying GIF by MOODMAN

The photo on their instagram page has nearly 2M likes. I guess that will clear a few things up for some folks here.

MaturingCheeseball · 11/03/2024 18:59

It takes a lot of photoshopping to turn a prawn into a prince. In real life his eyes are so close together!

Uricon2 · 11/03/2024 18:59

LittleGlowingOblong · 11/03/2024 18:46

I think the news agencies are showing restraint and not divulging publicly that Kate’s face itself has been photoshopped in.

These are professional news agencies with reputations going back a century. No one has actually seen Catherine since Christmas Day.

Even though publicly embarrassing Kensington Palace was an extreme move - especially as the future King himself put his name behind the photo - the reputational damage of releasing that photo, if it turns out something more serious has happened to Catherine, would be even more disastrous.

Edited

The reputational damage to the RF would be even worse, which is why I don't think they would clumsily photoedit her head in, whatever the circumstances. In a scenario where she couldn't appear (because very unwell, alien abduction, whatever) they would have been more likely to post one of the kids wishing her a happy mother's day, or they would do as flawless a job as possible (which this ain't)

Notably, in the Op's gleeful list of "alterations", the only alleged difference is that she doesn't look like the pap shot of last week. The very grainy, long distance pap shot which significant numbers said wasn't actually Kate.

Chupacabara · 11/03/2024 19:00

MaturingCheeseball · 11/03/2024 18:59

It takes a lot of photoshopping to turn a prawn into a prince. In real life his eyes are so close together!

🦐

THE TIMES: Where is Kate? The royal family attracts more speculation by the day
ArcaneWireless · 11/03/2024 19:02

A lot closer than the follicles are…

Chupacabara · 11/03/2024 19:02

Omg you’re right, they really have spaced his eyes out! Smoothing a wrinkle or two I expect but that’s complete facial restructuring! So fake!

Salemforcuddles · 11/03/2024 19:04

God love her when she does actually come out in public, her every action will be scrutinised

areyoutheregod · 11/03/2024 19:05

ok so to stop people discussing this royalists are just going to clog the thread up with photos of harry?

Maireas · 11/03/2024 19:06

Oh my god - Harry's photoshopping 😂
Should these images be banned? They're clearly untrue....

areyoutheregod · 11/03/2024 19:06

theres a big difference in a news agency and an agreed magazine story.

ArcaneWireless · 11/03/2024 19:07

Ach she’ll be fine salem

The tricoteuses won’t believe it is her anyway.

AliceOlive · 11/03/2024 19:07

Why would any news agency demand the original of a photo they lifted off instagram, anyway?

Uricon2 · 11/03/2024 19:07

Salemforcuddles · 11/03/2024 19:04

God love her when she does actually come out in public, her every action will be scrutinised

Quite so. Any deviation from perfection. Even then you'll get some saying "I bet she was never ill in the first place, just lazy, she looks too well" (&c ,&c, &c)

AliceOlive · 11/03/2024 19:08

areyoutheregod · 11/03/2024 19:06

theres a big difference in a news agency and an agreed magazine story.

Bit like when they create news out of someone’s MN thread, no? It’s on their IG. It’s not a press release. Big joke.

Grosshesselohe · 11/03/2024 19:10

areyoutheregod · 11/03/2024 19:05

ok so to stop people discussing this royalists are just going to clog the thread up with photos of harry?

As opposed to cluttering it up with utter loon conspiracy bollocks

AliceOlive · 11/03/2024 19:11

Sounds like Harry’s hair is demanding privacy now.

RockyandBullwinkle · 11/03/2024 19:12

Chupacabara · 11/03/2024 18:56

Does Harry photoshop a lot?

That's a fine head of hair.

Not sure that requires much in the way of forensic analysis😂

areyoutheregod · 11/03/2024 19:12

it wasn't lifted off instagram, it was provided to news agencies separately. The BBC took it off instagram

pipsfromthefuture · 11/03/2024 19:13

Maireas · 11/03/2024 19:06

Oh my god - Harry's photoshopping 😂
Should these images be banned? They're clearly untrue....

Did Harry Photoshop this photo or did the magazine?

AliceOlive · 11/03/2024 19:13

areyoutheregod · 11/03/2024 19:12

it wasn't lifted off instagram, it was provided to news agencies separately. The BBC took it off instagram

Right. So it was lifted off instagram.

ArcaneWireless · 11/03/2024 19:13
Little Shop Of Horrors GIF by Maudit

The fact that she’s responding personally, or that were being told the statement is from her, makes it seem like they’re desperately trying to disprove there’s a bigger problem.

Or she could just have made an arse of fiddling with the photo. I’m sure it will all be fine. At least she is willing to put her hands up to it. Unlike some.

There is no need to look for anything sinister.

Although most of us know if it had been someone else, a little TV interview would have been arranged and it would all have been put down to unconscious editing… 🌱 🐉

areyoutheregod · 11/03/2024 19:13

AliceOlive · 11/03/2024 19:13

Right. So it was lifted off instagram.

By BBC. Not by the news agencies, AP, Reuters etc were provided it

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.