They are all poorly regarded for their interviews but omit Andrew (who is rightly and roundly detested by just about everyone), none of them have been subjected to the onslaught of negative, highly critical, and often absolute bullshite, articles in the way Harry and Meghan have. The volume is unprecedented.
None of them experienced in real time the social media response either. None of them have been subjected to the microscopic examination of every word they utter, and every action they take, as much as Harry and Meghan have.
I presume you do recognise however that the world has changed int he last decade, and while you are correct about the volume of articles about Harry and Meghan, and the social media response, other people in the Royal family could not have experienced that in the past because it did not exist?
I presume you would also accept that past Royals also suffered appalling treatment, even if it came in different forms?
I think the changing world means that it’s impossible to make comparisons on these topics.
For example, there may not have been the volume of press headlines about Diana, as Meghan, as the media is considerably more fragmented and diluted now than it was in the 1980s and 1990s, but Diana had pages and pages of coverage every day in the UK tabloids for many years - between them they sold between 9 and 10 million copies a day in the UK 2000. That’s an absolutely massive audience for critical articles, let alone the coverage outside of the UK.