What gives it away for me @Roussette is that posters who claim to have liked her but have now "gone off her" never fully acknowledge all the issues around how Meghan was dehumanised and othered, or the racist and xenophobic coverage she was subjected to, and how these attitudes reflect attitudes in the UK.
The discussion of the legal cases, and the press threads we have had, troubled me because of the refusal to accept that there is anything at all wrong in how the press covered Meghan in particular, and the whole "others took it, why can't she" line without any attempt understand that the tabloid culture in the UK sets up hate figures, is intrusive, violates privacy, and is racist.
Harry was even slammed for "moaning" about being hacked. While William was praised for settling his hacking case with Murdoch.
It has recently come to light that the Daily Mail uses "black fishing". Pieces that would be considered racist if written by white people are repurposed and published under the bylines of black commentators. In the cases investigated by two publications, Private Eye and the Voice, three of the authors were conservative white men over 60, and the "authors" were mainly younger black women. Some of these hit pieces included commentary about Meghan.
If there was even the tiniest bit of balance, these threads would be completely different.
Still plan to do my new press thread, hope you saw Rory Stewart on Amanpour talking about the pernicious influence that Murdoch and his papers have had on UK politics. That the Royal Family colludes with these people, out of fear or whatever it is, and that they throw each other to these harpies is a scandal that I hope in time will come to be seen more objectively. The tabloids are a cancer, and that the Royal Family and their aides have decided to get into bed with them is something that will forever diminish them.
Harry and Meghan will always have my support for taking them on.