@oakleaffy
Those podcasts were absolutely dire- Markle's breathy, highly produced voice interrupting the more interesting guests at every turn, right. {'Right' being a Markle word that she uses a lot}
There's a very funny article in The Times on this today (Saturday) - Harry and Meghan’s podcast revealed their painful pointlessnessAs the Sussexes’ $20m Spotify deal comes to an end, James Marriott asks if they have anything left to sell.
Harry and Meghan’s podcast revealed their painful pointlessness (thetimes.co.uk)
Here are a some of the bits I enjoyed:
"Archetypes, you may have forgotten, was a motivational interview show aimed at helping women “to be our authentic selves”, whatever that means. And it was the distilled essence of purest Californian banality. A great big smiley, bland motivational nothing. Even the unintentional hilarity of the self-regarding celebrity speak (Meghan always telling her guests things like “I want to hold a space for you as a guest to define yourself”) could not sustain public interest."
...
"The podcast revealed their pointlessness more painfully than any of their other ventures. At least Harry’s cringeorama memoir was about something. Archetypes generated a few astonished initial reviews. But after that, nothing. No headlines. No news stories. Not even much Twitter mockery.
Nobody cared."
...
" For Harry and Meghan this is a worrying sign. Meghan’s most (only?) profitable media enterprise is endlessly retailing her story about leaving the royal family. Last year’s Netflix documentary milked that tale to within an inch of its life. There is nothing more to be said.
The failure of Archetypes shows that whenever she tries to talk about anything else, virtually nobody is interested. Even the roster of high-profile guests (Serena Williams, Mariah Carey, etc) couldn’t save the podcast. Meghan has a remarkable ability to take fascinating people and cover them in meaningless gush (“You’re choosing liberation and newness. I love that so much”, etc) until they are not interesting at all. The opposite of good interviewing technique."
I think that last bit is particularly astutely observed. Interviewing people for media is a skill. Broadcast journalists train to do it. There is no reason why anyone would think they can just do it, any more than you'd think you could be a trapeze artist without any training.