Archewell only had two donors

[Blip]

Interesting to see that Archewell donations were 99% made up of donations from just TWO one-off donors, one of £10M and one of £3M.
Speculation that this was £10M from Oprah for the interview and £3M from Tyler.

This doesn't look very sustainable to me.

No - I am saying that private text messages should not be public property - ie in a book

Oh ok sorry I misunderstood. I’m assuming that’s because the other side leaked their version…

@Cokefans just to clarify what I’m saying about the IRS letter, it’s a fake.

@Whaeanui no worries 😃

@Lilyofthevalley23 can you clarify where you got that letter? Was it Reddit? Or the weird website Gabrielle Bourne? Because I’m pretty sure that it’s fake, unless you have another source? Archewell Inc is both a for profit and non profit, so they won’t be tax exempt. Any letter would be addressed to Archewell Foundation.

@MarshaMelrose did you see ‘the letter’ on Reddit too? Or the nutty website I’ve mentioned?

@Whaeanui

Please send me a message with the name of the nutty website if it is against regulations to reveal it here.

I have spent time on the Reddit Saint forum, it is clear where some of the posters here are getting talking points and memes.

I was initially appalled but I am now riveted and highly amused by the contradictory things they come up with. There was recently a bun fight about whether the kids exist, with some saying posting that makes the forum look like a collection of lunatics, and the compromise I think was that one child is "borrowed", but the other does not exist. It's such batshit theory for Royalists to spread because it means that they believe the Royal Family is conning the entire world by putting those kids in the line of succession.

There is a reason these people are called Derangers. 😆

They’ve taken an actual actresses name and used it: Gabrielle Bourne .com
it’s mad and deranged and that along with the Reddit hate thread are the only sources of the ‘letter’. The letter is a fake. The date is well before they registered the foundation officially, I checked, it’s written to Archewell Inc which is partially for profit, instead of the Foundation, and of course the other obvious thing is they wouldn’t have published a private IRS letter. The actual classification is published online and as I said, charitable org which covers many different types of not for profits. I’m just surprised nobody has come back to the thread @MrsMaxDeWinter I noticed some comments on Reddit are identical to ones here- I don’t have an account. I guess I’ve just learned then that this is where some of the misinformation we see here and the more unhinged comments, comes from.

@MrsMaxDeWinter reading the rest of your comment… that is truly batshit crazy! I read some crap like that on twitter, the kids don’t exist, they had a surrogate and faked the pregnancies… it’s sad how disturbed people can get

I'm afraid to say Meghan's sister was at the bottom of a lot of the phantom pregnancy, surrogate conspiracy theories. She was actually banned from Twitter at one point because of this. And yet there are posters on here who cheer her on, who wanted her to win the batshit court case, who think she's wonderful.

You couldn't make it up

Imagine how unhappy you have to be to do things like that?

A needless personal attack because she has a different opinion. Are you a Reddit regular too?

I am afraid I missed that post as it was deleted. But yes, there are at least three posters whose writing style I recognise from the Reddit forum.

@Roussette there's a brilliant article I read once about the pregnancy conspiracies surrounding Serena, Beyonce, Meghan, and can you believe it, Michele Obama, of whom it is said her daughters are not hers because she is "really a man". There is also a nasty racial undertone to this: that these black women are somehow getting away with fraud. It's very, very nasty, and is aimed at delegitimising black women considered "uppity" and above themselves.

that is nasty @MrsMaxDeWinter I actually have seen identical posts here to ones on the Reddit thread I found re the foundation. Word for word. So that’s interesting. It really is like a full time job for some. Yes another personal attack on @Roussette who has hardly posted on this thread. Thankfully MNHQ removed it.

Don't do Reddit or twitter or instagram. Cesspits all of them

To put it another way, how does anyone feel Harry is justified in earning their millions by dragging the name of his father, brother, sister in law, nephews and niece through the mud?

I'm shocked anyone would support someone who behaves like this, but it seems to be the stance of several 'Sussex sugars' who post (way too) regularly on here.

You ask this over and over and the answer is the same, other posters come to different conclusions to you. How is it relevant to what this thread is about? We’re discussing the fake letter right now. You should apologise for yet another personal attack.

‘Sussex sugars’ what is that? Another personal attack? I don’t know what it means. What do you call posters like yourself who relentlessly attack them?

To put it another way, how does anyone feel Harry is justified in earning their millions by dragging the name of his father, brother, sister in law, nephews and niece through the mud?

You clearly have not read the book. There is no dragging of anyone's name through the mud, and most especially not William's children. There is a lot of Harry giving his take on things though.

Just one example:

Newspaper headlines shriek: Meghan made Kate cry!
Harry says, eh actually it was not like that. He then states what happened, an account that is actually sympathetic to both women.

Why are you happy for Meghan's name to be "dragged through the mud" your words, in false news stories, but are not happy for Harry to provide the balance?

I'm shocked anyone would support someone who behaves like this, but it seems to be the stance of several 'Sussex sugars' who post (way too) regularly on here.

But to answer your question: it is this kind of untruthful, lopsided post that keeps some of us around, to provide the balance. I know you would prefer it if I and others disappeared and left you to create another echo chamber of nasty cyberbullying on the internet, but it's not happening.

For as long as you post (way too) regularly on here about Harry and Meghan, I will be here, posting (way too) regularly.

Hope that answers you. 😁

Yes it is a personal attack again. At least when posters use the word 'sugars' or equivalent, we know who has been all over very nasty forums and threads elsewhere.

Precisely @Roussette

Funny that.

For as long as you post (way too) regularly on here about Harry and Meghan, I will be here, posting (way too) regularly.

Haha, me also! I'm like that itch you can't scratch, that pimple that won't pop, that.... ok I think I better leave it there lol

@Roussette @MrsMaxDeWinter as predicted, nobody discussing this clearly fake letter have come back now it’s been identified to come from two dubious sources. I think Reddit contributors are determined to paint it as a public charity so they can carry on with the false narrative that they set up a charity asking for public money to make themselves look better.

@Whaeanui Methinks they don't know how Foundations in the USA work. Not that I do. It was like when there was absolute outrage that they had registered it in Delaware, forgetting that most non profit orgs and Foundations do so because of the flexibility within the State.
But of course, we are talking Harry & Meghan here, they have to be criticised for that. And posting fake letters from dubious sources is all part of that, isn't it?

@MrsMaxDeWinter
💯😀👊