Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Strangest bits in Spare…

1000 replies

Motorcycleemptyness · 15/01/2023 22:59

i haven’t quite finished it yet but I wanted to read a thread about some of the weirder bits of Spare, and I haven’t seen a thread where people were discussing those without the ‘H&M’ vs the rest of the RF debate. There are definitely some parts which have made me really question why they were included, and I was wondering if anyone else had any similar thoughts.

The inclusion of the imagery of the poppy fields, and how heroin funds the Taliban. Fair enough. We all know that. The rest of the book is one long ode to posh people taking drugs. Does Prince Harry think the cocaine he takes is gently knitted by fairies and delivered to him by unicorns? Do the drugs he takes not contribute to war and terrorism and misery across the rest of the world (and indeed misery and crime in the UK, where he is 5th in line to be monarch!) I found this quite a strange passage and I was wondering if anyone else had any thoughts, or am I just over thinking it?

Elizabeth Arden cream. ‘Mummy’s lips’. ‘Todger’. Why? But really, why? Why was this included? Why did anyone think it or commit it to paper, and then publish it? Why did I read it? Why am I typing it here? ARGH.

What he actually thinks the relationship between the royal family and the press should actually be. Only reporting true things? Someone had a photo of him taking cocaine. Dressed as a nazi. Calling his colleague a ‘P*ki’. He wasn’t happy, but it was all true. Should journalists not be allowed to report true things? Or should they only be reporting things he wants them to report? Does Andrew get to choose that too? What about everyone else?

What the actual royal family should look like. This was mind bending. He seems to be perfectly happy with the idea of the monarchy, an institution which is predicated on the idea that they’re inherently superior to the rest of us, and that’s their birth right, but seems to massively struggle to apply that to himself and William. If a monarchy is the best system, why shouldn’t the heir be treated differently to the spare? (I don’t believe it is the best system and wish we could abolish them all but I don’t understand how one can believe one but not the other!).

Anyone else have any interesting thoughts?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
22
DorritLittle · 16/01/2023 19:33

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 16/01/2023 19:16

It's double recessive - as are blue eyes.

Not everyone with 2 copies of the gene for red hair will have red hair either.

I believe Thomas Markle has hazel eyes and must carry the gene for red hair as well.

(Area I find interesting as biology teachers at school used to ask a lot if my sibling or I were adopted as we had very markedly different colouring of the sort that you would not expect to be possible if we shared the same parents. We definitely do.)

I find this fascinating too. Similar sibling totally different colouring situation!

Twazique · 16/01/2023 19:47

Does Harry explain in the book why he and Meghan lived in Frogmore Cottage rather than the apartment next door to PW and Kate at Kensington Palace?

I remember something around the time they got married about the Gloucester moving out to make room for them but didn't hear why they didn't move in.

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 16/01/2023 19:57

Twazique · 16/01/2023 19:47

Does Harry explain in the book why he and Meghan lived in Frogmore Cottage rather than the apartment next door to PW and Kate at Kensington Palace?

I remember something around the time they got married about the Gloucester moving out to make room for them but didn't hear why they didn't move in.

Apparently everywhere else they considered was too grand.

Considering what they bought in the US, it doesn't quite ring true, but does tick lots of boxes to suggest that they were being frugal and just wanting somewhere small and tucked away.

Strangest bits in Spare…
agedasiago · 16/01/2023 20:00

Eyerollcentral · 16/01/2023 03:59

The tone of the suits ref to Charles very much read to me like Harry was annoyed. I think most people would read it that way. What’s the significance of the cadence the writer has given the following: ‘Meg said she was in a cable drama that aired in the evening. About lawyers. Called Suits.’? there is a separate sentence to clarify that it’s a show about lawyers. Another to give it’s name. A really friendly way of writing that would be to say for example ‘Meg laughed warmly, smiling broadly at P, and said ‘Well I wish we were as popular as Coronation Street and went on as long, that’s for sure! I’m in a show called Suits which is a drama on cable about a corporate law office. It’s a great show and I love being in it.’ Can you see the difference in tone?
Listen, it’s up to you if you sincerely believe that Air Botswana air hostesses recognised Meghan from Adam and were dying for pics. I don’t buy it. I’d heard about suits because I am a lawyer and a corporate solicitor friend of mine loved it for her Friday night brainless binge with a glass of wine. But it’s totally mad to say it was very widely known globally at that time. In fact do we even know if there were broadcast rights for Netflix to show it in Botswana at that time? That would be interesting.
Finally, the easiest thing in the world for a reporter to do at that time to get close to Meghan undercover or not would have been to say ‘I love suits’ because it flattered Meghan and her ego. Meghan had a lifestyle blog before meeting harry and relentlessly networked with charitable organisations to raise her profile. You are stunningly naive to believe that Meghan did not want exposure.,

Thanks. I read it differently - as I said, Harry being immature and taking a stab at his father; I genuinely didn't and still don't see it as reflecting negatively on Meghan (or Charles). We'll probably never know, and that's fine with me.

I'd be surprised if Meghan were very familiar with Coronation Street at that time, but I could be wrong! You'd have had to be specifically looking for it on Amazon/BritBox to watch it in the US, although she may have seen it on TV in Canada. Personally, I would not have thought to bring it up in the context of that reported conversation; I honestly didn't even know it was considered a soap opera until this thread. (Out of curiosity, I looked it up on Amazon US/Britbox - the blurb says it's "the UK's longest-running soap" but the genre is "Drama".)

Netflix only had the UK rights to Suits - at least while it was still running - and that was only from Season 7 on. No idea who if anyone would have had rights to broadcast in Botswana. But an international flight crew would frequently stay overnight and sometimes even a few days before flying onward or back, often in an isolated airport hotel with little to do BUT watch TV until you fall asleep. They would not be limited to what is broadcast within Botswana.

You are stunningly naive to believe that Meghan did not want exposure. Didn't say she didn't want exposure. That's not the same as not wanting a camera shoved in your face in false pretenses when you're trying to do your grocery shopping (or drive home from work or spend time alone with your partner or friends or family).

People can dislike particular individuals as much as they want, but journalists did prison time in the UK for illegal surveillance of the Royals, including the odious Harry from age 15. There are plenty of documented stories of photographers putting their quarry in physical danger and/or continuing to shoot rather than helping when someone was hurt or in distress. Harry and Meghan could be formally declared the worst people in the world, and the problem still doesn't go away. Of course Royals and celebs (and aspiring celebs) court the press to a great degree in certain contexts. I just don't believe they relinquish their right to privacy and safety and case by case consent by doing so.

Eyerollcentral · 16/01/2023 20:11

agedasiago · 16/01/2023 20:00

Thanks. I read it differently - as I said, Harry being immature and taking a stab at his father; I genuinely didn't and still don't see it as reflecting negatively on Meghan (or Charles). We'll probably never know, and that's fine with me.

I'd be surprised if Meghan were very familiar with Coronation Street at that time, but I could be wrong! You'd have had to be specifically looking for it on Amazon/BritBox to watch it in the US, although she may have seen it on TV in Canada. Personally, I would not have thought to bring it up in the context of that reported conversation; I honestly didn't even know it was considered a soap opera until this thread. (Out of curiosity, I looked it up on Amazon US/Britbox - the blurb says it's "the UK's longest-running soap" but the genre is "Drama".)

Netflix only had the UK rights to Suits - at least while it was still running - and that was only from Season 7 on. No idea who if anyone would have had rights to broadcast in Botswana. But an international flight crew would frequently stay overnight and sometimes even a few days before flying onward or back, often in an isolated airport hotel with little to do BUT watch TV until you fall asleep. They would not be limited to what is broadcast within Botswana.

You are stunningly naive to believe that Meghan did not want exposure. Didn't say she didn't want exposure. That's not the same as not wanting a camera shoved in your face in false pretenses when you're trying to do your grocery shopping (or drive home from work or spend time alone with your partner or friends or family).

People can dislike particular individuals as much as they want, but journalists did prison time in the UK for illegal surveillance of the Royals, including the odious Harry from age 15. There are plenty of documented stories of photographers putting their quarry in physical danger and/or continuing to shoot rather than helping when someone was hurt or in distress. Harry and Meghan could be formally declared the worst people in the world, and the problem still doesn't go away. Of course Royals and celebs (and aspiring celebs) court the press to a great degree in certain contexts. I just don't believe they relinquish their right to privacy and safety and case by case consent by doing so.

@agedasiago sorry, you didn’t realise coronation street was a soap? Are you from Britain or Ireland? I would have thought it pretty unusual for an adult in either of those countries to know that even if they don’t watch the show.
I was using Coronation St as an example. If you cannot read between the lines and see how seriously Meghan believes her role in Suits should be taken then I don’t know what else to say.
‘But an international flight crew would frequently stay overnight and sometimes even a few days before flying onward or back, often in an isolated airport hotel with little to do BUT watch TV until you fall asleep. They would not be limited to what is broadcast within Botswana.’ All a bit of a reach here isn’t it. Much more likely they’d never heard of her and this never happened at all.
’There are plenty of documented stories of photographers putting their quarry in physical danger and/or continuing to shoot rather than helping when someone was hurt or in distress.’ Yes and that is terrible but none of those things happened to either harry or Meghan. Not really sure why you have included in reply to my post

WeWereInParis · 16/01/2023 20:37

In all the excerpts I've read, the writer seems to really favour short sentences. There are lots of full stops. It's annoying. To read.

I don't know anything about the ghostwriting process - will this be a style the writer generally uses, one he's chosen because he sees it as matching Harry's style, or something Harry will specifically have preferred?

I've not read the whole book though and am basing this on excerpts so could be wrong about the book as a whole.

Sugarfree23 · 16/01/2023 20:41

Winterday1991 · 16/01/2023 19:02

How does that work when one of the principles wants to go out spontaneously?

I have no idea but I don't think all of the minor Royals have 24hr security when they are out only when they are on official engagements.

It is purely my guess that places like Kensington Palace are guarded like a posh prison basically. And it's probably cheaper and easier to have them all guarded together than for them to be dotted about living in different places.

comrad · 16/01/2023 20:42

No you’re quite right. He does. Do that quite frequently.

Think it’s meant to make it seem more immediate, dramatic, engaging and to simulate an off the cuff informal chat. Perhaps over a joint or two 🤷‍♀️

Motorcycleemptyness · 16/01/2023 21:48

I have just finished it this evening. I am SHAKEN at the part where he deliberates about how he will pay for things after quitting his role in the royal family, and says spending the money left to him by Diana is a ‘last resort’. Who knew that spending our own money was a ‘last resort’? We would all have a lot more money to leave our children if we never had to buy anything, wouldn’t we?

There’s also a bit where he talks about the ‘essential fairness’ of the monarchy which is a statement that will live rent free in my head for a while.

So yeah, all in all, I actually quite enjoyed reading it! It was a not very taxing meander through recent British history, with a bizarrely unreliable narrator. Harry comes across as a complete clown with very little empathy or awareness for anyone else’s feelings at all. Feel really sorry for poor old ‘Willy’ (and by that I mean his brother, not PH’s penis) - feel like the majority of the book was an attempt to punish William for being born first. No wonder he pushed him in the dog bowl.

Anyway, abolish the monarchy!

OP posts:
Canthave2manycats · 16/01/2023 21:55

F4chrissakes · 16/01/2023 11:48

I read the stories about the fake bump pregnancy and took them with a pinch of salt, especially when Meghan appeared at the Disney thing they blew off the Royal Marines memorial thing for, when she looked like she was still carrying a bit of post baby chub. But I wonder now......she was what, 38 when they got married in 2018. Archie was born in May 2019 and Lillibet was born in June 2021 with a miscarriage in between. So 3 pregnancies in a little under 3 years. I thought fertility declined sharpish for women over 35? So surrogacy or at least assisted conception is not too outlandish an idea, is it?

I had three pregnancies in the space of 2 years - two miscarriages and a live birth.

Eyerollcentral · 16/01/2023 21:58

Motorcycleemptyness · 16/01/2023 21:48

I have just finished it this evening. I am SHAKEN at the part where he deliberates about how he will pay for things after quitting his role in the royal family, and says spending the money left to him by Diana is a ‘last resort’. Who knew that spending our own money was a ‘last resort’? We would all have a lot more money to leave our children if we never had to buy anything, wouldn’t we?

There’s also a bit where he talks about the ‘essential fairness’ of the monarchy which is a statement that will live rent free in my head for a while.

So yeah, all in all, I actually quite enjoyed reading it! It was a not very taxing meander through recent British history, with a bizarrely unreliable narrator. Harry comes across as a complete clown with very little empathy or awareness for anyone else’s feelings at all. Feel really sorry for poor old ‘Willy’ (and by that I mean his brother, not PH’s penis) - feel like the majority of the book was an attempt to punish William for being born first. No wonder he pushed him in the dog bowl.

Anyway, abolish the monarchy!

🙌🏻 Spot on

EpicChaos · 16/01/2023 21:58

BellePeppa · 16/01/2023 17:30

She hears him coming up the drive then gets herself on the floor and squeezes out those tears. She has to work extra hard because it can’t just be one tear from the left eye. No, she has to let these one flow freely from both eyes because they have to literally splash on Archie or Harry. With much practice she now has it down to a fine art. 😭😭

@BellePeppa @Winterday1991 Yeah, you can picture the scene can't you, looking out from behind the net curtains, hanky box on the floor ready, along with a number of pre damped tissues that had been swished round a damp sink, or something.
So much for her being a strong, independent woman, one of a couple that run towards trouble, not away from it!
They must think our heads are filled with kapok and button up at the back!

@MonsoonMadness · Today 17:46

I was just astonished that she should tell Harry she's actively suicidal and can't be left alone, just before a big event that they are due to attend, knowing his own mental health is shot and his mother was killed when he was 12. Honestly., however bad you felt, you wouldn't do that. She had access to the best help available on her doorstep. I just don't buy the 'no one would help me' routine. She could have picked up the phone anytime and got seen the same day. She lived in the centre of london.

Marvellous how she managed to turn that around in an hour, (which I thought totally unbelievable, days/weeks maybe, an hour or two with no help, not a chance! ) get herself all dolled up and sit at the show looking like the cat that got the cream, with a grin that made the Cheshire Cat look like someone that had lost £20.
Not just that she says she was suicidal but told him how she'd do it? Throw herself down the stairs a la Diana, perchance?!

purpledalmation · 16/01/2023 22:09

The whole thing except the mother's death, is an exercise in cognitive dissonance and gaslighting.

Coucous · 16/01/2023 22:13

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

Blossomtoes · 16/01/2023 22:28

This reply has been deleted

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

I like proving you wrong.

Strangest bits in Spare…
comrad · 16/01/2023 22:30

@purpledalmation 👏

Another poster once said he’s using ‘the script’ on his previous family relationships - I agree - he’s flakey

comrad · 16/01/2023 22:32

@ blossomtoes
those hugs look genuine to me

are we supposed to believe it’s all staged and all familial affection is totally faked cos irl they’re 🦎😂

Coucous · 16/01/2023 22:49

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

Ohgodthepain · 16/01/2023 22:55

I adore my mum and dad and I know they love me, we only ever kiss , we don't hug . My mum always grips the tops of my arms which could look like she's pushing me away but she's not.

Blossomtoes · 16/01/2023 23:07

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

MonsoonMadness · 16/01/2023 23:11

Eyerollcentral · 16/01/2023 21:58

🙌🏻 Spot on

Yes, agree with all that. It actually made me feel poor William has had a lot to put up with.

Coucous · 16/01/2023 23:11

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

ThePoshUns · 16/01/2023 23:12

Interesting thread. Saves me buying the book.

Blossomtoes · 16/01/2023 23:15

This reply has been deleted

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

What name did I call you?

MonsoonMadness · 16/01/2023 23:15

DorritLittle · 16/01/2023 18:52

Also isn't this untrue? I thought the redhead gene was recessive. Meghan would have to also have it for their kids to have red hair (if they do - I couldn't tell from the arty footage in the California sun).

He clearly wasn’t listening in Biology lessons. Or History lessons. Yea

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.