Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

If Prince Harry ever returns to the UK legal jurisdiction he should face criminal investigation.

104 replies

Megan1992xx · 06/01/2023 11:51

By his own words Harry has admitted industrial levels of drug abuse; we know he consumed an enormous bag of cannabis in Africa, so much that he forgot what day it was. Cocaine at a shooting party, as well as several lines of cocaine since. Add to that magic mushrooms, which are also Class A.
In effect his money (who I am kidding his father's money) has been channelled down a narcotic supply line to fund other forms of criminality.

If he had been born in Peckham and admitted to this he would be facing a long stretch.
Harry needs to be interviewed under caution and he needs to give up the name of those responsible for supplying him. For far too long a certain sort of public schoolboy, schoolgirl with access to free money has pumped money into the narcotic trade.
When the Civil Police have finished with him the Royal Military Police can then question him about his breach of military discipline. 2 years in Aldershot Glasshouse will teach him some valuable life skills and provide him with a trade when he leaves custody.

OP posts:
Megan1992xx · 06/01/2023 14:21

I do live in a lovely area at school I remember the Police did come in and stood at the entrance with sniffer dogs, they caught a few. It was a good lesson.

OP posts:
DialsMavis · 06/01/2023 14:21

The royal family's cocaine won't be coming through county lines, that is strictly for pub grub I reckon

TooBigForMyBoots · 06/01/2023 14:49

M8🤦‍♀️

VladmirsPoutine · 06/01/2023 14:55

I see your point but it's just much easier for all involved, not least the police, to just go and find a black boy in a hoody in Peckham. That way it looks like the police are cracking down on drug criminality and posh white people can continue to do whatever they like. Harry won't change anything, he just proves how life works. He was smoking cannabis in Eton whilst his protection officers patrolled outside.

Plbrookes · 06/01/2023 15:15

VladimirsPoutine. So, how many black boys from Peckham have gone to jail for smoking cannabis?

timetogetlost · 06/01/2023 15:52

I thought this was going to be about killing 25 people.

bluebird3 · 06/01/2023 16:06

The RF has legal immunity so he can do what he wants

Talapia · 06/01/2023 16:13

VladmirsPoutine · 06/01/2023 14:55

I see your point but it's just much easier for all involved, not least the police, to just go and find a black boy in a hoody in Peckham. That way it looks like the police are cracking down on drug criminality and posh white people can continue to do whatever they like. Harry won't change anything, he just proves how life works. He was smoking cannabis in Eton whilst his protection officers patrolled outside.

Agree with you. Coke and a rifle, fine for a white posh idiot.
Not so cool on socially deprived black kid.
No one's going to query his ability to parent, hold a gun etc, even though he's showing how unstable and thick he is.

StellaGibson2022 · 06/01/2023 16:26

Depends how much the dealer had in terms of supplying.

In London drug use is prevalent - weed is a common smell where I am and I am sure a lot of my neighbours enjoy weekend Class As. Lots of heroin and crack addicts around the local supermarket car park and is not unusual to see someone on a methadone programme when in Boots.

I think the police focus more on the organised crime aspect these days rather than just possession and/or possession with intent to supply would factor in quantities, money found etc so wouldn’t necessarily mean a custodial sentence anyway.

This is the reality of policing following lack of government funding.

As an aside I would also assume that any drug taking in the past was known about anyway in terms of royal protection officers.

Plbrookes · 06/01/2023 16:32

bluebird3 · 06/01/2023 16:06

The RF has legal immunity so he can do what he wants

No, that's not correct. Harry would not be immune from prosecution.

Plbrookes · 06/01/2023 16:33

Talapia - so a black man who has taken drugs is unstable and thick?

bostonchamps · 06/01/2023 16:44

Plbrookes · 06/01/2023 16:33

Talapia - so a black man who has taken drugs is unstable and thick?

You need to work on your comprehension.

BradfordGirl · 06/01/2023 16:47

Plbrookes · 06/01/2023 16:32

No, that's not correct. Harry would not be immune from prosecution.

Not officially. But they are never prosecuted for anything.

I assume that most of the Royal Family of his generation have used illegal drugs though.

Megan1992xx · 06/01/2023 16:48

One rule for the white privileged Harry quite another for black school children who are stripped searched at school for drugs.

OP posts:
ttcat37 · 06/01/2023 16:50

Megan1992xx · 06/01/2023 14:05

If the use of drugs is so widespread and so acceptable apparently amongst the young in particular why is the supply so harshly treated?
If there was a party and the host supplied cocaine for everyone who attended would that not constitute supply?

Because the supply of class A funds criminality at a much higher level eventually. Not for the street dealers but higher up the chain think money laundering, people trafficking etc and funding overseas terrorism. Then you have all the related crime like knife and gun crime, gang crime, kidnaps etc

It’s not really a thing for hosts of parties to dish out cocaine. Some people might offer it to their friends and yes this constitutes the offence of supply a class A. But it’s not quite like someone running a drugs line.

Plbrookes · 07/01/2023 03:21

BradfordGirl · 06/01/2023 16:47

Not officially. But they are never prosecuted for anything.

I assume that most of the Royal Family of his generation have used illegal drugs though.

I have never been prosecuted for anything. Therefore I must be immune from prosecution. No, that's not how it works.

Plbrookes · 07/01/2023 03:22

bostonchamps · 06/01/2023 16:44

You need to work on your comprehension.

You need to learn what a question is.

Pixiedust1234 · 07/01/2023 03:26

You were doing pretty well until your last sentence
2 years in Aldershot Glasshouse will teach him some valuable life skills and provide him with a trade when he leaves custody.

😂😂

Plbrookes · 07/01/2023 03:33

Megan1992xx · 06/01/2023 16:48

One rule for the white privileged Harry quite another for black school children who are stripped searched at school for drugs.

You can try to bring race into it. You're not the first and we can guess your motives.

foremostwilly · 07/01/2023 03:52

None of the drugs he claims to have taken were ever seized or analysed. How would the prosecution prove that these substances were in fact controlled drugs? They cannot use the defendant as an expert witness against himself.

Lampzade · 07/01/2023 03:59

Megan1992xx · 06/01/2023 11:51

By his own words Harry has admitted industrial levels of drug abuse; we know he consumed an enormous bag of cannabis in Africa, so much that he forgot what day it was. Cocaine at a shooting party, as well as several lines of cocaine since. Add to that magic mushrooms, which are also Class A.
In effect his money (who I am kidding his father's money) has been channelled down a narcotic supply line to fund other forms of criminality.

If he had been born in Peckham and admitted to this he would be facing a long stretch.
Harry needs to be interviewed under caution and he needs to give up the name of those responsible for supplying him. For far too long a certain sort of public schoolboy, schoolgirl with access to free money has pumped money into the narcotic trade.
When the Civil Police have finished with him the Royal Military Police can then question him about his breach of military discipline. 2 years in Aldershot Glasshouse will teach him some valuable life skills and provide him with a trade when he leaves custody.

Don’t be silly

durhamduck · 07/01/2023 05:26

Ok the title is obviously not going to happen, but I don't think anyone can reasonably disagree that drug possession is criminalised for the poor (and certain ethnicities) in a way it isn't ever for the rich

Spectre8 · 07/01/2023 05:47

Well then a vast majority of the those living in the uk should be arrested too then for consuming drugs.

Plbrookes · 07/01/2023 07:47

durhamduck · 07/01/2023 05:26

Ok the title is obviously not going to happen, but I don't think anyone can reasonably disagree that drug possession is criminalised for the poor (and certain ethnicities) in a way it isn't ever for the rich

Evidence please.

GiltEdges · 07/01/2023 08:02

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Swipe left for the next trending thread