U.K. tabloids are grim and they clearly hounded Meghan as they did to all the new wives over the last few decades, v misogynyistic, but I know there was also a racist element too on top by some of the tabloids. It wasn’t abundant but it was there and that is not ok.
As for Meghan, I obviously don’t know her. I know people spoke admiringly of her Grendel cook book initiative and that should be acknowledged. I find her claims she didn’t know who Harry was as farcical and also as if she didn’t know you had to curtesy to the Queen. Also I don’t forget she insisted she had no input to the Finding Freedom book but at the appeal court had to admit she had sent via a third party an outline of her biography.
As a couple I find the idea of Harry and Meghan being warriors taking shots at the Establishment a bit rich. They aren’t against the institution, as evidenced by them keeping their titles and they wanted to still be part of it but on their own terms. Their claims in the Oprah interview around Archie potentially not being made a Prince then and or in the future due to the colour of his skin doesn’t bear scrutiny due to the existing rules of the Letters patent and Charles indicating he wanted to slim down the monarchy long before Meghan came on the scene. It is what European royal houses are having to do if they want to survive. Separate argument whether they should (I am a Republican). They seem to put out a lot of half truths.
Also I think if a family member had made a racist remark then name them or take it up privately with them, by not naming them it cast aspersions on every member of the family which I think was badly done.
I think it’s sad two brothers have become so estranged and by the sounds of it a relationship between father and son has come under a lot of strain too. I note we are only hearing one side of the story. As is usual there will be their side, the other side and then the truth.