That's a good point and maybe something I need to really think about a bit more!
What bothers me is how people defend things H & M have said which are patently untrue. That's the bit that really irks me. And to maybe a lesser degree, how people think it's OK for them to say a) the press are awful and will hound you, and really destroy your mental health while b) knowingly throwing their high profile family to the mercy of the press, being aware that due to royal etiquette they'll never be able to respond and that they're subjecting their so-called loved ones to exactly the same treatment that apparently made Meghan suicidal.
Thinking about it, I guess it's the understanding how people can defend the things they've said and done, or insist that things are true when they very bloody clearly are lies. Those are the things that really seem to get under my skin - it's the lies and injustice of it all that I find hard to ignore. And that's when I wonder if there's something I've missed because I don't understand how the things they've said and done can ever be considered as OK.
If I were to set all of that aside, I don't care that people like someone that I don't. Similarly, I'm not bothered in the slightest if people don't like William and Catherine. Different horses for courses, and all that. What I don't like is hearing lies spoken about them, or the Royal family. The Republican and Monarchists both have valid points, and in many ways it's just a matter of opinion. But I dislike either side lying to score points or to try and "win". Same with H/M and W/C - don't care what side you're on, but don't resort to making shit up. There's nothing wrong with acknowledging someone's poor behaviour while saying that it's a) not a priority for you b) it was provoked or c) you don't care because the other side deserve it. I might not agree but I can understand the viewpoint. What I can't understand is the blind insistence that 2+2 = 5.