Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Unpopular Opinion - William and Kate

1000 replies

EdaYildiz · 13/10/2022 21:27

Don't come at me, I'm sharing my unpopular opinion because I want to know what you all think but just don't see a spark between William & Kate.

Loved them since the day they starting dating way back when they were undergrads at St Andrews but I just don't see their connection in pictures and it seems a little forced when she has her hand on his back or when they do hold hands.

I don't expect them to hold hands and snog because I know they're mostly photographed whilst they're working but he looks bored and she looks like she's trying her best.

Does anyone agree with me?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
33
Puzzledandpissedoff · 27/06/2024 14:06

CoffeeCantata · 27/06/2024 13:58

Puzzled
I wouldn't disagree with that, , though would add the point that they're also jobs where people have to go through a very vigorous selection process, whereas with the RF we just get the next one in line

Yes - absolutely! But my point was that we ask them to do a very high-level job which, as you say, is normally only trusted to the very select and elite few. I was just trying to counter the rubbish that's sometimes talked on here about how easy their roles are, and how lazy they all are! I think it's tough to be born into those expectations however privileged your upbringing is.

And a very fair point too - so much so that we might almost say it's downright unkind to expect those with no professional training or qualifications, and who may not be temperamentally suited to the job anyway to be pitched into it like this

... an argument which suits republicans just fine Wink

It's all ludicrous speculation!

Genuine question, @LadyVictoriaSponge: how is it speculation to suggest that H&M didn't actually want to leave completely when they issued a "manifesto" outlining exactly that?

MaturingCheeseball · 27/06/2024 14:09

I would say to Harry, “But Margaret…” She undoubtedly led a life of luxury after the Queen ascended the throne, but she didn’t get half . Same with Anne, Andrew and Edward, and all the other “extras” going back 1000 years or so.

I can only surmise that he does truly think he is special. What on earth led him to believe that he could share the Duchy of Cornwall and that he and Meghan could have Windsor Castle? I suppose he has kind of raised an army (online) and mounted a couple of rebellions (Oprah and Spare).

LadyVictoriaSponge · 27/06/2024 14:10

Ashadeofgreen55 · 27/06/2024 11:34

I don't know about Meghan's reaction, but the whole point is that it will be William controlling the money, and in the not too distant future - something H&M would have perhaps been wise to consider

I love the way everyone on here is posting as if having your brother control your budget when you are an adult is a normal, reasonable way to live!

I mean, how many of us would relish being in that situation? It's a recipe for family toxicity if ever I saw one and I don't blame Harry for wanting out.

It’s no particularly unusual, in my farming family it’s the same, the oldest brother inherits the farm and it’s often the same with family businesses, one family member is the boss and controls the wages of other family members who are employed. What most family businesses don’t support is for one member to go rouge, particularly when they then publicly write and say dreadful things about the company and its family members and yet still expect to keep their wages and perks.

LadyVictoriaSponge · 27/06/2024 14:11

CoffeeCantata · 27/06/2024 14:01

LadyVictoriaSponge
It's all ludicrous speculation!

Well, it might sometimes be speculation, but I think it's well-informed speculation - and often based on good evidence.

I don’t think you meant to quote me @CoffeeCantata it was a previous poster who claimed it was ludicrous speculation.

LadyVictoriaSponge · 27/06/2024 14:17

Genuine question, **: how is it speculation to suggest that H&M didn't actually want to leave completely when they issued a "manifesto" outlining exactly that?

It’s not me who said it was, I think you need to tag @Ashadeofgreen55 who made this claim.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 27/06/2024 14:20

Genuine apologies then, @LadyVictoriaSponge ... that really was my fault Blush

LadyVictoriaSponge · 27/06/2024 14:22

No worries @Puzzledandpissedoff it’s easily done!

CoffeeCantata · 27/06/2024 14:27

LadyVictoria - many apologies!

I'm easily confused.....

LadyVictoriaSponge · 27/06/2024 14:30

No problem! @CoffeeCantata

Uricon2 · 27/06/2024 15:41

I suppose historically a fair few second in lines have had to step up, most recently George V and George VI, the latter with no preparation and at a very difficult time (I think he'd have done anything to remain the "spare", poor man)

I don't think Harry or in a previous generation Margaret realised how lucky they were and it seems to breed resentment. Life of luxury, much less pressure, do decent work while still enjoying quite a lot of freedom and end up beloved. Anne has shown that it is possible, so maybe it's a matter of character. I'm very hopeful that William and Kate will make sure their children have a good grasp of the nature of things and encourage them to find ways of making the best of their respective situations.

MissMarpleRocks · 27/06/2024 16:45

MaturingCheeseball · 27/06/2024 14:09

I would say to Harry, “But Margaret…” She undoubtedly led a life of luxury after the Queen ascended the throne, but she didn’t get half . Same with Anne, Andrew and Edward, and all the other “extras” going back 1000 years or so.

I can only surmise that he does truly think he is special. What on earth led him to believe that he could share the Duchy of Cornwall and that he and Meghan could have Windsor Castle? I suppose he has kind of raised an army (online) and mounted a couple of rebellions (Oprah and Spare).

I think at times Harry is lucky he didn’t live 100’s of years ago as he could have ended up as George Duke of Clarence murdered in vat of wine or whatever it was.

At the very least he’d have been confined to the Tower.

Rhaidimiddim · 27/06/2024 16:53

AliceOlive · 27/06/2024 12:22

@Rhaidimiddim
One of the strengths of out system is that people whose faces don't fit get removed.

What does that mean to you? It’s a strange turn of phrase.

Perhaps I should have said "people who do not fit in" or " personalities who are not suited to the job". I thought the idiom "his face didn't fit" would be clear, but is obvioisly not as widely understood as I supposed.

Rhaidimiddim · 27/06/2024 16:55

Uricon2 · 27/06/2024 12:28

One Charles. Charles II was welcomed back with open arms and made a reasonable fist of ruling, partly by being very unlike his father in style and also picking up some lessons on the "travels" he had no desire to repeat.

You may be thinking of his younger brother, James II, who was deposed.

I stand corrected, thank you.

Uricon2 · 27/06/2024 16:56

MissMarpleRocks · 27/06/2024 16:45

I think at times Harry is lucky he didn’t live 100’s of years ago as he could have ended up as George Duke of Clarence murdered in vat of wine or whatever it was.

At the very least he’d have been confined to the Tower.

Malmsey I think it was. Another idea for ARO as they may be branching out in that direction? Perhaps not.

milveycrohn · 27/06/2024 17:04

The reason why you cant be half in and half out, is the the RF have some specific rules.
For example, they are not allowed to accept freebie designer clothes, and have to pay the full price. This appears to be something that Harry and Meghan failed to understand.
As a member of the RF, they represent the monarch, and by extension the UK Gov.
Can you inagine, only accepting the free stuff for 6 months of the year, but then 'being royal' the rest of the year. Can't work.
so, you cannot really monetise the RF for half the year, then be royal the rest of the time.
This is why you can't be half in and half out.
There are other examples, but I admit, it is not an easy path.

MissMarpleRocks · 27/06/2024 17:06

Malmsey ahh yes thanks @Uricon2

Serenster · 27/06/2024 17:28

The reason why you cant be half in and half out, is the the RF have some specific rules.

The Nolan principles - they apply to working Royals along with other public servants.

www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-7-principles-of-public-life/the-7-principles-of-public-life--2

EvangelistaSister · 27/06/2024 17:35

Meghan did keep a lot apparently . Why was she allowed to?

OhmygodDont · 27/06/2024 17:42

MaturingCheeseball · 27/06/2024 14:09

I would say to Harry, “But Margaret…” She undoubtedly led a life of luxury after the Queen ascended the throne, but she didn’t get half . Same with Anne, Andrew and Edward, and all the other “extras” going back 1000 years or so.

I can only surmise that he does truly think he is special. What on earth led him to believe that he could share the Duchy of Cornwall and that he and Meghan could have Windsor Castle? I suppose he has kind of raised an army (online) and mounted a couple of rebellions (Oprah and Spare).

Wouldn’t that be something to do with Diana wanting them raised as equals or some such I’m sure I read before.

Runnerinthenight · 27/06/2024 17:52

Ashadeofgreen55 · 27/06/2024 11:34

I don't know about Meghan's reaction, but the whole point is that it will be William controlling the money, and in the not too distant future - something H&M would have perhaps been wise to consider

I love the way everyone on here is posting as if having your brother control your budget when you are an adult is a normal, reasonable way to live!

I mean, how many of us would relish being in that situation? It's a recipe for family toxicity if ever I saw one and I don't blame Harry for wanting out.

I must have missed that. I didn't see anyone say it was reasonable or unreasonable; it just is!

Harry only wanted half out anyway.

Runnerinthenight · 27/06/2024 17:55

Ashadeofgreen55 · 27/06/2024 12:57

Or just maybe ... he isn't in control of what a load of nutters write on the internet and doesn't want to give them any legitimacy by engaging with them?

And maybe he plans to make his own living?

Well he would need to have something to offer over 4 years later, other than trashing his family!

He has plenty to say on other occasions!!!

Uricon2 · 27/06/2024 17:55

OhmygodDont · 27/06/2024 17:42

Wouldn’t that be something to do with Diana wanting them raised as equals or some such I’m sure I read before.

I've read that and I can appreciate it as a normal, in fact good, parenting instinct. It doesn't really work though when "there can be only one" in the boss role and short of tragedy (or abdication) it will never be the second.Perhaps an extra amount of care needs to be given to that secondborn so they grow up seeing it as a positive rather than not. I think having more than 2 must spread the load of expectation a bit, TBH.

Because of her partying ways Margaret was often portrayed as the "naughty sister" against the late QE's calm and dignity. Maybe that happened with Harry too, rather, but before it all went pearshaped and they left, he was undoubtedly extremely popular, wasn't he second (again, but in a good way) only to the Queen in all polls?

Runnerinthenight · 27/06/2024 17:56

Ashadeofgreen55 · 27/06/2024 13:01

I am not a Harry apologist as my feelings towards him are pretty neutral tbh but none of us know for sure what happened or what he wanted v the RF because we weren't there.

All of the posters on here who are projecting their own agendas on to the actions and thoughts and motivations of H& M don't know for sure either!

It's all ludicrous speculation!

It's really not!

Runnerinthenight · 27/06/2024 18:00

LadyVictoriaSponge · 27/06/2024 13:52

I see the old trope from back in the day has made a resurgence “we weren’t there, how do you know what happened” always with the added caveat of “not a Harry fan”. Drums fingers waiting for “but what about Andrew!”

We weren't there either, in Andrew's case, lol!

OhmygodDont · 27/06/2024 18:01

Uricon2 · 27/06/2024 17:55

I've read that and I can appreciate it as a normal, in fact good, parenting instinct. It doesn't really work though when "there can be only one" in the boss role and short of tragedy (or abdication) it will never be the second.Perhaps an extra amount of care needs to be given to that secondborn so they grow up seeing it as a positive rather than not. I think having more than 2 must spread the load of expectation a bit, TBH.

Because of her partying ways Margaret was often portrayed as the "naughty sister" against the late QE's calm and dignity. Maybe that happened with Harry too, rather, but before it all went pearshaped and they left, he was undoubtedly extremely popular, wasn't he second (again, but in a good way) only to the Queen in all polls?

It was very misguided to have Harry raised as William’s equal overall.

He should have been raise as equal children to mummy and daddy but always with the cavet that ultimately one will be king. His strops over sausages and such nonsense show an insane amount of jealousy, being granny favourite was likely what he sold himself to cover hurt feelings, because as we saw with George he was doing things the other two never did to prepare and show he was actually different not better than them but different in the life of a royal family.

Yeah the fun one that lads lads. Clearly all an act to cover up a hugely insecure jealous man child. Married the first women who would accept him basically. Sold Megan a dead fish 😬

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.