Public members rude to meghan

[RheanaT]

I've seen a clip on Instagram where a group of women completely blanked MM when she spoke to them. It was awful to watch.
I feel so sorry for her, she didn't deserve that at all.
I saw another clip where someone had asked her for a hug, she obliged and when they hugged she really held the member of public and closed her eyes, it looked as if she really needed that hug .
No wonder she ran away from the UK

Sges disrespectful, she absolutely does deserve it

Some posters will turn even the most beautiful words into something sinister.
Even the lovely things that Meghan had said about the Queen are turned into something negative
When someone has an agenda it doesn’t matter what the evidence is to disprove their theory. unbelievable and very sad

Why is she disrespectful?

She looked nervous because she knew people would be thinking she's had to rethink her next moves and swallow a big bitter pill to agree to do the walk about. She was worried about being booed and ignored and people who behave the way she did should be worried as good will and sympathy soon runs out when you're proven to be a liar whose version of 'the truth' is shown to be a lie.

Her words were lovely and positive her actions were disrespectful and negative and certainly not compassionate. Therein lies the rub for me, nothing else to it than that.

You don't talk about compassion, build a business model around it and then do something that's the polar opposite. Well you can I suppose but don't expect to come out of it looking too great.

Or it could simply be that she was nervous because of all the ‘lies’ told by the Daily Mail.
She was worried that the British people would believe all the negative press and she would be treated with contempt
As I said before, the woman who ignored her looked stupid in my opinion. Thankfully they were others there with more grace and class .

I've seen people say she was booed. So I'm interested to know why the ones who booed weren't arrested when the police couldn't wait to jump on anyone booing Andrew. It's very wrong.

Meghan lies, it’s the unfortunate reality. She twists facts rather like some of the posters here

Grace and class. Both of which she has very little of. The lies were spewed by her on international television, thankfully no one had to purchase the DM to read them, we got them straight from the horses mouth.

How can you say that ? Yes she may have never directly insulted the Queen but she went on Oprah to insult the firm while her husband lay dying causing unnecessary stress to her. Her words might be nice to her but her actions were not.

It's madness. Meghan Markle has never done anything wrong except marry a prince.

This clip tells me all I need to know. Just beautiful.

mobile.twitter.com/daddyhope/status/1569080953368199176

The only twisting of facts that I have witnessed is those on the anti Meghan brigade.
I am not suggesting that Meghan is without fault. However, calling someone a liar without explaining why they are lying is wrong
Some go on about the fact that she said that she was ‘married’ in the garden.

It may not have been an official marriage but in her eyes she probably saw this as the ‘real’ marriage because it was between herself and Harry without all the fanfare and pomp of the Royal wedding.
I am not saying that I am correct, I am simply giving an alternative view.

To my mind the constant lambasting of Prince Harry and his wife in the British press probably caused the Queen stress.
The use of emotive language in order to make Meghan look like a villain is just obvious and silly tbh

This is exactly what makes me feel uneasy about Meghan.
Something that doesn't ''Ring true''.

A pretence of being 'Caring and compassionate' but doing and acting the opposite way to her own father, especially, who did give her a lot when she was growing up.

I do think she was heavily spoiled as a child, and this sense of ''Me first'' definitely lingers on...Meghan even barged in front of the Queen to get into a car first.

The Queen was gracious about it, having impeccable manners, but it did show the self~ importance that Meghan has.

I cannot - I mean, I really cannot - believe that people are still scrapping about a ruddy bunch of flowers. It's not my place to tell others what to care about, but like the nail varnish, the tights, the damned avocados and god knows what else, what the hell does it really matter?

On the other hand maybe this underlines why some of us thought it a shame that H&M were there. Something or other was always going to cause a ruck with the she can't do a simngle thing right/you're all racist contingents, and so it's proved

And no, before the inevitable question's asked, I don't believe Andrew should have turned up either ...

I don't know if it's the way the clip I saw was cut but she had just been "snubbed" by some crowd members and then was approached about the flowers?

That sounds like you saw a clip that had been edited for effect, nachoavocado - the “flowers” incident happened first then the “snubbing” incident a good 15 minutes later.

they have the absolute right enshrined in royal policy to be named on the public register of the line of succession as prince and princess. It is breathtaking that you are trying to excuse two toddlers being prince and princess

I must be missing your outrage that Lady Louise Windsor and Viscount Severn also are missing out on their absolute right enshrined in public policy to be named on the line of succession as princess and prince. And have been for the 18 and 14 years now, respectively, that they have been grandchildren of the sovereign in the male line. Is that also breathtaking?

The world has moved on since 1917, and the grandchildren who are removed from the direct line of succession have no good reason to be given a title that in many cases would be a burden. Especially if they live outside the UK and in a country that doesn’t recognise them in the first place. If they wanted titles, they too have be Lord Dumbarton and Lady Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor since birth (but their parents obviously decided against that).

Lamp*zade
"*Some posters will turn even the most beautiful words into something sinister.
Even the lovely things that Meghan had said about the Queen are turned into something negative
When someone has an agenda it doesn’t matter what the evidence is to disprove their theory. unbelievable and very sad"

Maybe you are the one with the agenda? And the one who is sad?
When someone's words do not match their actions I suggest believing the actions. Meghan says she loved and respected the queen but her actions continually inform us how she really feels about the queen and RF and who she really is.

How to you rationalise the dancing on the streets in SA at her marriage like at Mandela’s realise real ease then @Lampzade ? They were her own words not too long ago

She lied about not providing Omid Scovie with material for his book and had to apologise to the court.

Her allegations that her passport was taken away - implying she was a prisoner when the reality was she was making secret trips and not so secret trips

she lies and twists to suit her own narrative at that time. Are these the worst things in the world no. - but I’ve found - never trust a liar, because they lie a useful mantra to follow.

They loved and respected the Queen, just not enough to visit her.

As I said words and actions differ.

The couple also put out decidedly snarky responses to messages that came straight from the Queen - “you don’t own the word Royal, actually” and later “Service is universal” when her statement had suggested that monetising your public position was not compatible with a life of public service. Plus they also got in a few barbs about how she was being controlled by her courtiers and surrounded by the wrong people - some nice undermining there.

So yes, opinions may differ on this point!

I am simply giving an alternative view to some of the views on this thread. If that is me having an agenda then so be it.
When I see posters make random accusations against Meghan Markle, without backing it up with credible evidence , I will challenge it. When the evidence is credible I will agree with it and eat humble pie
However, in most of these Meghan’s threads all I see is posters making accusations against this woman and employing emotive language in order to get their point across.
This is not a year six persuasive writing task where one is supposed to use emotive language and hyperbole to get top marks .
This is really life that we are dealing with.

@Lampzade

are you not happy with the evidence I provided ? Are my points not credible ?
Are they not Meghan’s own words.

www.peta.org/blog/meghan-markle-fur-free/

i’m guessing that Meghan won’t wear ermine to the coronation , which I applaud personally. This I’ve no issue with her kicking up a fuss about it if they try to get her to wear them

I hope though some posters then won’t say she’s not wearing robes because of racism

I think that’s PETA assuming things rather than Meghan making any public comment, Ohnevermind.

They also claim she opposes leather, but she wore leather trousers just a couple of weeks ago for the publicity pictures for her podcast episode with Mandy Kaling.