So Meghan and Harry left the UK because of people like those women you mentioned. But they're not coming back even though the vast majority of people were pleased to see them on the walkabout and one asked Meghan for a hug. Which, to me, means it's not about their reception in the UK. We, as a nation, will never be able to persuade them that most of us are like the hugger so why bother? They don't want to be here and that's fine.
Yes there are people who do not like Meghan because of her colour. Equally there are people who don't like her because they perceive she 'stole' 'their' prince away to a foreign land. Both are pathetic.
But there are others still, like me, who couldn't care less about either of them now. The Oprah interview ended my love in with those two. If they consider me and my country racist/unaccepting that's fine. Their prerogative. I can't change their minds so good luck to them.
But I, along with many others, were thrilled when Harry married Meghan - absolutely thrilled. My friends and I were away that weekend but tuned in, raised a glass to them, commented how gorgeous Meghan looked, how nice her mum seemed and did a collective 'aww' when Charles walked her up the aisle.
Now? If they went to shake hands, I would because of the occasion or out of politeness. But if you said Harry and Meghan are in the high street I'd probably shrug and get on with my day. I honestly have zero interest in either of them. Both of them seem needy people and they've found each other so good for them. My view is however, that if you want be be left alone, stay out of the limelight unless it's work related. The Royal work is no longer theirs to worry about so they don't need to be commenting on the RF (HM the Queen's death excluded obviously, as that's Harry's family). Not their world any more.
As for this 'picking on Meghan', Catherine was called 'Waity Katey', William's friends took great pleasure in taking the mickey out of her airline stewardess mother and don't forget the zoom lens photographs of her topless on holiday that were published overseas. There are always comments about her weight. She's now called 'Kate the Snake' by some Meghan supporters who also point out that Meghan has no bags under her eyes but Catherine does. But that's OK because it's not about the colour of her skin apparently.
Meghan said to Oprah that she didn't get the help that Catherine was perceived to have had when she joined the family. But who is that down to? Do you think William stood by and watched Catherine fall at hurdles? Or Charles with Camilla for that matter? Do you think both of them may have arranged for help for their spouses to be made available? Do you also think, had someone made detrimental remarks about Williams future child, he'd have ripped their head off or do you think he would have gone back to Catherine to tell her what had been said?
Because Meghan said on Oprah that she heard about the remarks about the colour of their future child via Harry, not from the horse's mouth. Who goes back and tells their pregnant wife that someone is, potentially, bad mouthing her and their child? But doesn't do a thing about it. What man does that? Really?
And as for the speculation of the colouring to Archie being racist, my DSis is a red head (inherited from our grandad) and her husband is very dark haired. And of course we wondered whether her DC would inherit mum's red or dad's dark hair. It's normal to speculate. Will baby be tall like dad or small like mum? Will grannie's blonde come through like the cousins? We've all done that!
It depends on how it was said, there's a huge difference between 'God I hope baby isn't black/red haired or whatever' and 'I wonder if baby will have darker colouring like Meghan or be a pale red head like Harry?' One's unacceptable, the other is just a wonder who baby will take after.
We don't know what was actually said because a) M&H have never said exactly what was said, b) never told who said it even though Oprah pressed them, c) don't seem to have picked the person up over it and d) not given the person the opportunity to explain themselves or dig a themselves into a bigger hole. All they've done is fan the flames and stood well back. Which worked well for the publicity and kept them in the limelight so I'm guessing they thought that through, are happy with the potential fall out or they wouldn't have done it would they?