More Of Meghan’s Archwell podcasts…

[susan12345678]

Just to continue the discussion

Two perfect examples above - no-one mentioned institutional racism. The discussion was about a specific accusation. It's similar to the dead cat technique. Look at this here! And not over there with the topic you were actually talking about.
Sealioning and grey rocks.

I think she was accusing the papers' readers of using the N word. The UK ublic, in fact. This they didn't deserve to see a photo of Archie. until CBS had

Very true.

I haven’t heard that word used in over thirty odd years. Thank goodness. It just isn’t true

I agree. It comes across that way to me too.

There's no need to be so snippy. I apologise for missing the point.

There is very little about SF or PA on MN. Bear in mind I've started endless threads on PA and they get very little traffic and never fill. So I don't need to "look harder" thanks

If that is what she meant, then I am I guess pleased for Meghan that she is confident that no-one in the US would use that word to describe her children? Personally I think her confidence is misplaced, though. (I also think she was referring to the Royal Rota when she said that, not the general readers),

If that's the case, does she really expect us to believe that the UK is any more racist than the US?

How do you know that Meghan signed it off? I’d be surprised if she did!

Ive just been listening to Jesus Christ Gethsemene, when Meghan the Musical comes out, I’ll expect something similar 🤣

I think that the Andrew threads get less traction as no matter what views people have on his legal troubles, whether criminal or civil or whatever, everyone (except the mother of his children and his actual children) agrees he is a complete cunt.

And they (“they”) have fully prevented him (muzzled, thank God!) from directly speaking to any public media outlet since that gobsmacking interview. Bet he’d love to try it again though. he’s simply not allowed to say “poor me!” In public. But if he did! Wow. Spoilt little royal whining to the public about how his own idiocy made him look extremely stupid, naive, entitled and out of touch. No thanks.

How do you know that Meghan signed it off? I’d be surprised if she did!

It entirely depends on the publication, and the celebrity involved. Given Meghan talks at length in the article about how she now wants to tell her own story, and it was an article to promote her podcasts, I would be very surprised if she didn’t ask for copy approval - I think she would have seen this as a PR piece, first and foremost.

Snog
@Rousette are you seriously trying to say that Meghan is not making her money from her Royal Title?????

Have you read my post? I said she didn't use it for her podcast and if she never used it again, ever, you would STILL be saying she's making money from it.
She is married to a member of the RF, that isn't going away, whether she uses her title or not. It's something you have to come to terms with.

Ok Roussette firstly she did use her title for her podcast
It's in the credits as screen shot by a PP.
She also uses it in the promotional articles she has done around the podcast.
How you know what I would say if she dropped using her titles I don't know as you are not me, unsure how you could possibly be confused about that tbh.
I would be very pleased if she stopped using her title as would most of the British public I expect. If she continued to trade on her royal connections for financial gain without using her title explicitly to make money yet whilst throwing slurs at the RF then I wouldn't think that was a very admirable way to behave but I would find the degree of hypocrisy lessened considerably if the titles were dropped.

Meghan is married to Prince Harry, that's a genuine fact for once not just how she feels about the situation (now that we are beyond the three day period of when she said she was married but in fact was not married). I have never been in denial of the fact that she is married to Harry so how exactly is there any need for me to come to terms with that? I don't think anyone has any issue with accepting this fact about Meghan and it seems at odds with reality to suggest that.

ajandjjmum · Today 12:31
Diana was never Princess Diana - she should have been Princess Charles but (understandably) chose to use the Princess of Wales title. It was the press and general public who called her Princess Diana, which always stuck.

I don't think she was ever Princess Charles, because he was already Prince of Wales when they married. She was officially Diana, Princess of Wales.
In time it will be Katherine, Princess of Wales.

Do you not think that’s because 99.9% of people think he is an arrogant, despicable creature?
It would be a pretty boring thread if someone posted about PA and everyone responded by saying “ I agree”.
M and H are hugely divisive therefore discussions are livelier .

There's no point in stripping them of the Sussex titles...she'd be entitled to be Princess Henry of Wales...which would easily shorten to Princess Meighan. I suspect that would suit her down to the ground.

I agree the lack of discussion on Andrew is down to their being general agreement that he's a creep, also...they've muzzled him. There was a massive explosion of interest after the interview, and it still comes up now and then when he shows up at events. If he continued to do interviews, pod casts about how innocent he is, then there would be threads galore.

I can imagine a situation of being caught up in the excitement of the premier, celebs including Beyoncé and JayZ there, and the general high of the occasion, for the “cast member” to be hyperbolic and gushing in his enthusiasm when meeting Meghan.

I doubt that he really meant in all seriousness that he and fellow South Africans equated Meghan marrying Harry to Mandela being freed. But people do say daft things in the moment.

Like you might go to a dinner party and say to the host “that was the best meal I’ve ever had, better than (insert famous chef).”

I think the cringe is that Meghan apparently took it seriously and to heart. Or did she? Who knows. We weren’t there and we also don’t know the tone in which she relayed the story to the Cut.

Of COURSE I get that. But even when there were developments with all that went on, they were not busy threads

If I remember correctly, there were numerous threads about PA's interview with Emily Maitlis.

There’s nothing to say. He’s a horrible, entitled, morally bankrupt person. End of.

Of COURSE I get that. But even when there were developments with all that went on, they were not busy threads

Sadly, but truthfully, I have found that not that many people are interested in the minutiae of cross-jurisdictional litigation. They don’t know what they are missing out on 😉

Snog

I'm not 'at odds with reality', I just know that if they dropped their titles and he was just Prince Harry, nothing much would change.
She'd be called Princess Meghan by the public and media to match him most likely

@Wheresthebeach

I'm not sure about muzzled ...
He made a bee line for the press at Philips funeral .
He was regularly seen accompanying the queen in her car .
He walked the queen down the aisle at something or other ( I don't watch the events - jubilee maybe )
Not one member of the 'royals' have publicly condemned what he did.

He had to stay close to mummy to avoid being served at once point

I don't think there is any particular need to strip M & H and of their titles as all they need to do is to stop using them and request that others do the same when writing articles promoting them.

There were threads on the interview, yes but I am sure we can all agree it was gobsmacking and garnered interest
I started threads on developments before and after, they never filled