Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry in the UK

559 replies

Mummy194 · 30/06/2021 19:08

Well Harry is looking quite good. Suntanned and healthy. The glow of new parent perhaps. Just seen his video on Diana awards and he looked so happy when visiting Wellchild too.

I'm sure his charities were happy to keep in touch with him.

www.wellchild.org.uk/2021/06/30/remarkable-young-people-and-professionals-from-across-the-uk-receive-national-wellchild-award-from-the-duke-of-sussex/

www.instagram.com/dianaaward/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
smilesy · 08/07/2021 22:59

“Roussette

For their cbs ratings obvs

For goodness sake, give them some credit, the Queen is still alive and yet you're saying this?”

Give them some credit in what way? Not sure what you mean. It was a hypothetical question asking if the Queen were to suddenly pass away, what would they do? We know the Queen is still alive and hopefully has many more years to live. 😀

Roussette · 09/07/2021 07:34

It wasn't a hypothetical question at all. It was a dig about this couple about something that hasn't happened. The poster was saying they will be close with Harry's father just for TV ratings. Not to repair a relationship but solely for CBS. Pretty poor saying that in my book but hey... that's the norm on here.

As for TM, he is the one who sold his daughter down the river flogging letters and access and pictures... all for money. I'm not surprised they are NC, it's what MNers would advise in Stately Homes!

smilesy · 09/07/2021 08:09

But the actual question was hypothetical, Roussette. It was talking about a possible set of circumstances.

SueSaid · 09/07/2021 08:21

@smilesy

But the actual question was hypothetical, Roussette. It was talking about a possible set of circumstances.
Yes surely the very definition of hypothetical is speculating on a situation that hasn't happened Confused

'As for TM, he is the one who sold his daughter down the river flogging letters and access and pictures... all for money.'

Again, ditto the Sussexes. They of course feel justified breaching the rf's privacy but the fact is they've done exactly the same. The difference is he had evidence to back up his claims where they apparently don't.

Cacacoisfarraige · 09/07/2021 08:26

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Roussette · 09/07/2021 08:27

There was no question. There was a statement. Yes a hypothetical statement but not a question.

On TM, which I was posting about, not about the RF... no H&M have been quiet on that.

Roussette · 09/07/2021 08:28

Cacaois You might. I don't. Hmm
And I don't know their bank balance, doubt you do either!

smilesy · 09/07/2021 08:34

@Roussette. Ah. I see the confusion! The statement was in answer to the hypothetical question that I asked about what would happen if the Queen were to pass away tomorrow. You must have missed it 🤣

Roussette · 09/07/2021 08:36

I quoted Janiie's statement about CBS, and posted in response, that's all !

PurpleOkapi · 09/07/2021 08:40

I’m curious about all of those defending Anne. If it was established that her comments were racists (assuming it was Anne, and that there was an actual investigation). Would you try to minimise it and say oh, she is old school etc etc?

It would really depend on the comment. If it was "Harry, you shouldn't marry a black woman because she'll be [insert racial stereotype here], and so will your children," then of course not. Her coming from a generation and social class where some amount of racism was normalized might explain that belief, but of course that doesn't make it ok. If it was "Harry, if you want your children to be raised in the same social circles you grew up in, you should consider that a dark-skinned wife and children may not be fully accepted by many in those circles," then I think that's a different thing. The underlying issue is racism, but not Anne's personal racism. I don't think anyone would argue that it isn't a true statement, regardless of whether the speaker approves or disapproves of any of it. That's the problem with characterizing the statement so vaguely - no one knows if it was horrid racism, completely innocuous, or something in between.

SueSaid · 09/07/2021 08:48

'The statement was in answer to the hypothetical question that I asked about what would happen if the Queen were to pass away tomorrow'

Perhaps we need to use disclaimers for clarity such as this is a hypothetical situation that I predict could hypothetically occur in response to the hypothetically question the pp hypothetically posted? Not sure if it clarifies things does it Grin

Context mumsnetters, context!

smilesy · 09/07/2021 09:06

@JaniieJones 🤣🤣

Cacacoisfarraige · 09/07/2021 09:09

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Marmaladeagain · 09/07/2021 09:24

Before any investigation could take place - H&M would have to get their own variation of recollection of events corrected/straight.

H: "it was right at the beginning when we first got together" (once and a general conversation along lines of: Harry, you realise you and your potential family may become the subject of exactly the type of racist comment you yourself are known to have made and claimed "it was a "joke").

Or: - is it M's version which states it "was in tandem" when pregnant and finding out that her children would not be Prince/Princess etc

Meghan was led up garden path by Harry's determination to ignore his dwindling future as no longer being the "spare" and it had moved away from him down through William's children.

H could have a word with his uncle Charles Spencer that in order "to be fair" then everything present and future should be shared with his sisters and nieces and nephews etc

Harry seems happy to accept direct heir line (and male) through the Spencer line, but claims to have trouble understanding how such rules of succession impact him via the RF. The RF have moved slightly more with the times though and changed to allow a female child take throne ahead of younger brother.

PearlNextDoor · 09/07/2021 09:51

@Cacacoisfarraige
I think the older generation in Ireland is moving well with the times. Given the restraints on them to confirm and the fear of not conforming that they were all brought up with!

I bet every single one of those 70 somethings at bridge is white! and you're right, nobody is updating them with what they ought to be thinking/saying. And unlike their counterparts in the UK they've no non white acquaintances to help them pick it up as they go.

In the late 60s, they talked about ''mixed marriages'' and all that was meant by that was one catholic one non catholic. Hard to fathom now.

Plenty of younger non white people in Ireland but to be honest, the younger people don't really 'see' older people.

PurpleOkapi · 09/07/2021 09:52

The most sense I could make of their disjointed versions of events was that someone said something to Harry while he and Meghan were dating, then he repeated that comment to Meghan while she was pregnant, and they had multiple conversations about it. Why he'd have done that when he knew she was actively suicidal is beyond me. That's what makes me think he didn't perceive the comment as offensive until Meghan reacted strongly to it. Why would he tell his seriously depressed, suicidal pregnant wife "Oh, btw, Auntie So-And-So told me a year ago that she'd disown me if the baby wasn't white enough. Just thought you should know!"? That doesn't make any sense.

PearlNextDoor · 09/07/2021 10:02

I think Harry's motivations in telling Meghan may have been complicated by his desire to prove to her that he is Team Meghan.
It couldn't be ambiguous. He couldn't have a foot in both camps and say ''I see your point'' and ''I see their point''.

Meghan didn't hear the conversation. Harry heard it. I agree that maybe he didn't perceive it to be that bad? Initially.
And then, instead of defending his family and saying that they had no bad intent with the comments HE had heard and she hadn't, he raced to prove he was Team Meghan. All or Nothing! No middle ground.
Because that's the mess the situation had become. Winners losers Goodies Baddies

PearlNextDoor · 09/07/2021 10:08

I do blame Harry equally. I think if he'd been stronger in his own self he would have said ''no I won't let you attribute maliciousness to x or y where none was deliberately intended'' and he would have stood firmer in that. But he allowed himself to be told by Meghan what the intent behind a conversation she hadn't heard was, and he weakly used the situation to prove to her that he was on HER team.

He's so weak.

Roussette · 09/07/2021 10:19

That is all supposition. You don't know what was said I don't know what was said, no one does. it could've been a lot worse than the scenarios posters are speculating it could be.

Neither do we know what Meghan said or did, so it's daft to say we do. For all you know, he was incensed and she tried to calm him down.
All speculation to assume anything

Cacacoisfarraige · 09/07/2021 10:43

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

PurpleOkapi · 09/07/2021 10:51

For all you know, he was incensed and she tried to calm him down.

Harry clearly said the conversation with the relative happened very early in his relationship with Meghan. Meghan clearly said her conversations with Harry about it happened while she was pregnant. If he'd managed to keep it to himself for an entire year, it's not believable that he'd suddenly decide he was so incensed that he just had to tell her.

All we know is what they've chosen to tell us. If their own stories don't line up or key details are missing, that's on them. If someone can square their versions of events with each other in a way that makes more rational sense than my theory, I'm interested in hearing it.

Roussette · 09/07/2021 10:57

Who knows Purple. Inwardly seething, didn't know what to do, buried it...whatever. Totally believable.

We do not know.
Posters can presume, suppose, speculate all they like but no one on here can say how and what happened with any certainty, which a lot of posters and posts are doing. So yes, it is just a theory.

Cacacoisfarraige · 09/07/2021 11:04

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

upinaballoon · 09/07/2021 11:14

[quote Cacacoisfarraige]@PurpleOkapi

My mums not racist but she’s old fashioned. When we grew up (ireland 70’s/80’s) there were no black or Asian families in our school.

As a consequence my mum doesn’t have any black friends. Once when we were out she referred to someone as ‘coloured’. I said ‘that’s not what we say anymore’ - she replied ‘I thought that’s what people preferred. She then said , it’s hard when these things change and no-one tells you. I’m guessing she learned her during the end of the SA apartheid regime which was widely pushed for and welcomed in Ireland

She’s nearly 80. She still calls Europe ‘the continent’😂

Ireland is a much more multicultural place nowadays, but she spends her free time with other 70+year olds playing bridge.[/quote]
I am in my seventies. When I was a child, say 6 years old, it was perfectly acceptable in England to call someone "coloured", more polite than saying "black". "Cape-coloured" in South Africa was a specific description. If you were to find some BBC material from, say, 65 years ago, you might find the word "negro" used in what in those days was a perfectly respectable way. When I was older "Black Power" came to the fore - Malcolm X, young men making black power salutes at the Olympics etc., and so I learned that now I was to say "black", it wasn't a little bit rude any more, it was the accepted word. (Yes, I did see Denzel in the Spike Lee film - who wouldn't?) Now we are at a point where it's considered in some circles to be ok for me to describe a person as a "person of colour" but awful beyond belief if I say "coloured person". Logically, it's rot. The words black and white infuriate me, and so far in my life I have never seen a white person or a black person. Brown, beige, cream, ok. I have added this because I realised that this evolution of terms isn't known by everyone. I was talking to a younger person at the time. I don't care if this is de-railing.
We don't know what was actually said. Harry did say that he was surprised by it. Correct me on that if I'm wrong. The actual words used would be interesting to hear, but I don't think we'll ever know. The things that they both did say AND didn't say have left everyone in the RF under suspicion, except HMTQ and PP, and that seems unfair to all of those who didn't say it.

PearlNextDoor · 09/07/2021 11:43

@Cacacoisfarraige

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.
Why on earth did mumsnet delete this comment?

Sometimes they just delete because somebody reports. There's no effort made to read, assess, conclude...