It might not be a duck though. It could be a rabbit.
Reality is often ambiguous. How it is perceived and interpreted is influenced by cultural bias and personal experience.
If the Charity Commission did find something untoward whilst looking into Sussex Royal, that might provide some objective facts in the curious case of Harry and Meghan. But most of the ‘evidence’ available thus far can be spun according to the predilections of the observer.
'I’m sure there were many people reaching for the chuck bucket over this Oprah Winfrey interview with Meghan Markle and Prince Harry.'
'The Meghan Markle way, you see. Condemn everyone. Name no one.'
Sky News Australia presenter
Duck!
'It was really hard to watch. They were talking like ex-cult members that had somehow fled and made it out.'
The View panellist on H&M in the Oprah interview
'…weaponisation of white fragility against a woman of colour.'
Another panellist from the View on weddingtears-gate.
Rabbit!
And if you are able to switch from one viewpoint to the other and are befuddled by the whole business - don’t worry. It shows a flexibility of mind and an ability to appreciate nuance.