Good morning, all. Hope everyone ill is feeling better.
I like this thread too. Some great insights on here.
Dandy - I have no doubt that journalists use this site. How could they not after all the effort we put in to put the world to rights? 
I've been thinking about 'what went wrong'. I think that the royals are, more than anything, 'a brand'. The Queen is the most recognisable woman in the world, they are synonymous with quality, stability, OTT celebration and pageantry, utility, etc.. Just like any big, global brand. Game Theory (weighing up costs and benefits and formulating behaviour strategies) suggests that we keep them because their benefits to us ('us' being the country and its citizens) outweigh their costs to us. They know this, hence, 'The Firm'. They all subscribe to the brand and work to maintain it. Married-ins do so too. Diana turned against the brand after her divorce but I would still put her into 'The Firm' because feeling bitter after a divorce is not a reasonable indicator of not wanting to be part of the overall brand.
Enter Harry and Meghan. Harry, despite the occasional pronouncement that he dislikes royal life, always seemed to be an enthusiastic member of The Firm. Then, he met Meghan, and, here is my point - Meghan was too. She seemed keen, ready and able to work for The Firm, and received adulation and support from the public (note, though, that the public is constantly weighing up how she can improve their lives by bringing in trade, re-directing funds from elsewhere to this country, etc.. Adulation is not blind) and a reasonable press (they'd always get one or two negative articles but, knowing how this all works, I don't think she'd give a jot about those)...which, leads me to think that what went wrong was not anything to do with the media or the public but something internal within The Firm. It all fanned out from there.
SleuthPenguin rests her case.