Hollyoaks, how far pregnant wasTina??

[SparklyGothKat]

Because that baby looks huge for a premature baby??

she was over 30 weeks as it was not actually Tonys baby it was Russes from the one night stand she had when she had a massive row with her hubby.
she is going to want the baby back now she has had hysterectomy then it will come out that the baby is not his. gripping stuff! need to get out more! me that is!

but that was at xmas yes? So she's about 32-33 weeks? My Ds2 was born then and he was a skinny little thing..

The pregnancy is 4 weeks more on than everyone thinks it is....Bound to come out... you mark my words... no one ever gets away with it in soapland...

sorry i may have added a spoiler there as i watch the next episode on E4! Many apols.

must admit the baby looked like it was on solids! probably about 4 months in rl

Yes.. the baby was mahoosive for a prem. Even though it was meant to be 30 weeks, not the 26 she thought she was.

Still far too big for a 10 week early baby!

And yes, it is Russ' baby, and I am going to assume she will want it back now that she has had to have a hysterectomy.

Poor Tony and Jackie.

Yes.. the baby was mahoosive for a prem. Even though it was meant to be 30 weeks, not the 26 she thought she was.

Still far too big for a 10 week early baby!

And yes, it is Russ' baby, and I am going to assume she will want it back now that she has had to have a hysterectomy.

Poor Tony and Jackie.

real 33 weeker

loving this story line now Ive discovered how to ON Demand when its at a more convenient time for me!!

legally can Tony and Jackie claim him?

No, doubt it. There was no contract or anything. I think if they went to court Tina could argue that she never agreed to surrogate.

Plus, as the baby is not Tonys anyway, they don't have much claim to him, really.

Jesus, I'm taking this all very seriously.

No, doubt it. There was no contract or anything. I think if they went to court Tina could argue that she never agreed to surrogate.

Plus, as the baby is not Tonys anyway, they don't have much claim to him, really.

Jesus, I'm taking this all very seriously.

but if Tina uses the fact that the baby isn't actually Tony's as a reason to keep it, she has to admit to Dom about Russ and that opens another can of worms...(although they were in 'Friends' terminology 'on a break')

I LOVE hollyoaks!!!

Ooh, true.

Well, he is clearly going to find out.

So, basically she just had a baby prematurely after being pushed down the stairs by her brother she does not know is her brother which was meant to be a surrogate baby for her sister, fathered by her brother in law, however the baby was actually fathered by her other brother in law who she shared a double wedding with.

Where do the writers get this stuff?!

it is wonderful. love the way Niall blamed Fletch too.

yup, DSM, that is a very precise summary of the plot.

it is JUST like real life!!!

the brother who she doesnt know has turned absolutely wicked!!

only in a soap. ( i hope)

what happened to newt?