Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Telly addicts

SPOILERS BRIDGERTON SEASON 4 - Benedict’s story

462 replies

IWantToHibernate · 28/01/2026 16:55

I couldn’t see a thread so thought I would start one.

The first 4 episodes drop on Netflix tomorrow (29th Jan). We will then need to wait until 26th February for the other 4.

We all know it’s not a realistic period drama but it’s great escapism and I’m looking forward to binging the first 4 eps.

OP posts:
CaragianettE · 01/02/2026 12:59

Kirschcherries · 01/02/2026 12:15

I’ve been thinking about the infertility plot line. They could turn it into how a same sex couple in Regency times can have a longed for baby. IVF is too far a stretch even for Bridgerton.😂

I think they've basically got three options if they want to address the infertility plotline:

  1. Francesca struggles with infertility for a long time, they've already started this plotline as she's mentioned to John she's worried they're not pregnant yet, but does finally and unexpectedly have her rainbow baby (possibly after a plot spoiler event occurs)

  2. Fran has to come to terms with the fact that she and John are infertile as a couple and she will never have a biological child. Michaela is a bisexual rake and gets pregnant from a one night stand, she and Fran will raise the baby and pass it off as Fran's. On this note: I haven't read 'When He Was Wicked' but from what I understand being a rake is a big part of Michael's character, so I'm curious how they will address this with a female character.

  3. Fran or Michaela adopts a child (I don't know loads about Regency history but informal adoption was a thing in the nineteenth century, though obviously not formally as a same-sex couple) and raise it together

Personally I think 2) would be interesting, both to see a female rake character and to address non-biological parenthood. I've got a couple of straight friend couples who have adopted children, as well as a couple of lesbian couple friends where people who are parenting kids who aren't biologically related, it would be nice to see that kind of parenthood reflected on screen.

LondonLady1980 · 01/02/2026 13:05

Maybe Rakish Michaela will get pregnant out of wedlock, hide from society and then once it is born she will hand it over to Fran and Michael to raise as their own.

HarryVanderspeigle · 01/02/2026 13:13

The Benedict and Sophie actors are only 10 years apart and he is 20 years younger than the actress who plays his mum. Definitely not more suited for her. People who object definitely shouldn't read or watch sense and sensibility, it's completely appropriate for a teenager to marry a man pushing 40 there!

myladyjane · 01/02/2026 13:43

@CaragianettE I wondered about option 1 - she miscarries just after John died doesn’t she.

dd and I did construct an alternative if they did same sex with a different sibling - we thought Eloise and Cressida would have been an excellent twist (starts writing after an elderly husband dies…)

DontMonkeyWithMyBusiness · 01/02/2026 13:47

honeyrider · 31/01/2026 22:15

Luke Thompson is 9 years older than Yerin Ha.

But had a considerably harder paper round.

IWantToHibernate · 01/02/2026 13:52

Maybe Michaela will have male genitalia. Anything is possible in Bridgerton.

OP posts:
IWantToHibernate · 01/02/2026 13:55

HarryVanderspeigle · 01/02/2026 13:13

The Benedict and Sophie actors are only 10 years apart and he is 20 years younger than the actress who plays his mum. Definitely not more suited for her. People who object definitely shouldn't read or watch sense and sensibility, it's completely appropriate for a teenager to marry a man pushing 40 there!

Yes but Luke looks even older than he is (when playing Benedict anyway). He looks miles older than all his siblings. I would place him around mid to late 40s even though he’s still in his 30s.

OP posts:
CaragianettE · 01/02/2026 14:14

IWantToHibernate · 01/02/2026 13:52

Maybe Michaela will have male genitalia. Anything is possible in Bridgerton.

I don't think anything is possible on Bridgerton. They were definitely more cautious and censored about showing Benedict hooking up with men, versus e.g. Anthony and Siena.

As Bridgerton is so 'woke' as people have said, I don't think they'd fall into the trap of treating a trans character as a surprise. If Michaela was meant to be trans, they would have cast a trans actor and been upfront that that's what they were doing.

Mum2838 · 01/02/2026 14:30

IWantToHibernate · 01/02/2026 13:55

Yes but Luke looks even older than he is (when playing Benedict anyway). He looks miles older than all his siblings. I would place him around mid to late 40s even though he’s still in his 30s.

Edited

I wouldn’t go as far as late 40s! But I agree, he does not look like the second son between Anthony and Colin, he looks like the oldest. Unless Anthony ages up a lot from his trip in India. 😂

Or maybe we’re all noticing the lines on Benedict’s face more now that the attention and camera is on him.

I think standing next to Yerin would age anyone to be fair!

pouletvous · 01/02/2026 14:36

What’s fran’s beef with the sister? Have i missed something or is that to be revealed?

CaragianettE · 01/02/2026 14:42

IWantToHibernate · 01/02/2026 13:55

Yes but Luke looks even older than he is (when playing Benedict anyway). He looks miles older than all his siblings. I would place him around mid to late 40s even though he’s still in his 30s.

Edited

Ruth Gemmell who plays Violet also looks younger than late 50s. I admit when she and Benedict had their scenes together I did think they looked more like a potential couple than mother and son, and also arguably more of a well-suited couple than Benedict and Sophie. I do worry though that we're all getting our perceptions skewed so much by Botox and fillers that we're all forgetting what normal aging looks like. I don't think Luke looks so much older than his age, he just doesn't look younger than his age.

Korea is famous for skincare, which may be part of why Yerin looks so flawless (although you'd think it's hard to avoid sun damage in Australia!)

IWantToHibernate · 01/02/2026 14:50

pouletvous · 01/02/2026 14:36

What’s fran’s beef with the sister? Have i missed something or is that to be revealed?

Do you mean John’s cousin (Michaela)? Without giving too much away, it was obvious at the end of S3 that Fran is attracted to her.

In the book Michaela is Michael.

OP posts:
IWantToHibernate · 01/02/2026 14:51

Mum2838 · 01/02/2026 14:30

I wouldn’t go as far as late 40s! But I agree, he does not look like the second son between Anthony and Colin, he looks like the oldest. Unless Anthony ages up a lot from his trip in India. 😂

Or maybe we’re all noticing the lines on Benedict’s face more now that the attention and camera is on him.

I think standing next to Yerin would age anyone to be fair!

It’s something about his mannerisms that make him seem older imo. And his voice. I can’t put my finger on it. Yes he has more facial lines than the other actors too but I don’t think that’s the only thing.

OP posts:
Brownbananaspot · 01/02/2026 15:01

JustFish · 31/01/2026 00:34

Oh gods what fresh hell is this? I am still watching but cannot suspend my disbelief any longer.

Benedict is a randy chlamydia ridden koala and what's with the sideways smirk? I know, it's meant to be rakish charm combined with boyish vulnerability but he looks like he's trying out for a gurning contest and the minute you see it, it removes any tenuous sex appeal he may have had.

Episode 3 - they end up soaked through in the storm, break into the house and light a fire. Great! So what happens to the horses? Last seen standing in the gravel, hitched to a gig in the pouring rain, as if they were a bloody car that's just parked up. Was there a convenient groom, that they somehow didn't contact or ask to help them get into the house, who picked up the pieces there? Did Benedict, mysteriously wounded on the flank with a diffuse bruise ( that somehow develops into a fresh looking straight linear scar) when he shows it to Violet in episode 4 manage to get out and unhitch /stable the horses before collapsing? Did the overly competent masquerade maid manage to fit that in in between lighting fires and mopping his fevered brow? What kind of first aid is some mysterious liquid found in a bedside bottle,(alcohol? Aftershave? Water from a flower vase?) and an incompetently tied bandage strip and pad for a wound anyway? and how does it provide such instant relief? How does she manage to do the manual work of multiple people in related to running a regency household and have nice hands/nails, and time to read?

Whistledown just doesn't work without the anonymity and subterfuge, it's now narration padded out with boring and enfeebled analogies. Equally, all earlier nods to a class system with ton, demi monde, servants etc that were in the first few series have completely evaporated. Now we have maids sitting with their mistress for an informal chat like it's some sort of personal development meeting? All the interplay of relationships, friendships and contacts that could be made, that were unacceptable, taboos, shiboleths, society rules, and decorum are just gone.

Right, I am willing to accept it's totally ahistorical regency lite. I can deal with alternative histories and colour blind casting, it made for some great earlier series and some fabulous actors getting involved.

But we have now firmly gone with the Netflix curse of all issues must be represented in the current approved fashion. So we have a minor character housemaid with a limb disability (why couldn't she have been a debutant, it would have been more convincing than as a house maid?) a couple speaking BSL in a crowd scene, nothing wrong with any of these things but it all felt so tokenistic and shoehorned in, in a way that is conspicuously different from the earlier series.

On the same note - it's trying so hard to be relevant and au courant, with the sub plots. Maids and their labour market issues! An older woman rediscovering her sexuality, dealing with age and self image! Young bride struggling with her sexuality in a relationship with an almost painful absence of chemistry (but somehow still the worlds most supportive and sensitive regency husband giving her a very modern total acceptance pep talk? )

(My bet is on F discovering her same sex attraction and some sort of thrupple with the intrusive cousin, and I will be v disappointed to be wrong) with alternative theories include her discovering she is asexual. Or neuro diverse. Or possibly all three?

Incidentally, the cousin arriving like a hoydenish highwayman, driving her own coach, as her coachman had motion sickness - well, why would he be employed as a coachman then? Surely that major issue might have come up during his apprenticeship and previously employ? Unless he's being shoehorned in as a sufferer of mennieres or something?

Still loving the costumes the hair, the cakes, the style, and a few strong actors who can wring a good performance out of this drek but my god, it's even painful to hate watch now.....

Edited

I couldn't agree more with this summary. I'm still watching, it's an easy bit of TV to have on.

I'm surprised though by the love for Kanthony on the thread. I remember the threads during their series being very different to the rose tinted comments here.

Season 1 feels like a completely different show. No Duke (alas) and only a token mention of Daphne in this one.

Violet is the stand out character in this for me. I'm enjoying seeing her bloom. Do we know what age she is meant to be in this?

Brownbananaspot · 01/02/2026 15:05

One stand out scene for me was when the Bridgerton men were play fighting over Gregory's shave, and Sophie observed the other servant cleaning it up later and rolled her eyes. If I were Sophie that level of immaturity from a grown man would have given me the ick immediately.

It's a far cry from the 'respectful of servants' persona Benedict gives out.

CaragianettE · 01/02/2026 15:09

Brownbananaspot · 01/02/2026 15:01

I couldn't agree more with this summary. I'm still watching, it's an easy bit of TV to have on.

I'm surprised though by the love for Kanthony on the thread. I remember the threads during their series being very different to the rose tinted comments here.

Season 1 feels like a completely different show. No Duke (alas) and only a token mention of Daphne in this one.

Violet is the stand out character in this for me. I'm enjoying seeing her bloom. Do we know what age she is meant to be in this?

I agree with some of it, but I don't really get why the presentation of the housemaid with a limb disability is tokenistic - seems to me like she's just there? Agree it seems like it would be a disadvantage in terms of the job, but I was served once in a bookstore by someone with a limb disability who neatly gift-wrapped my book for me one-handed. People find workarounds I guess.

IWantToHibernate · 01/02/2026 15:22

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. It’s annoying it’s in 2 parts and I can’t see the benefit of spacing it out for 4 weeks. Anyone who only wanted to subscribe for 1 month would wait until all 8 episodes are out. Season 1 and 2 were massively popular and all episodes were out at once.

OP posts:
FiloPasty · 01/02/2026 15:51

I’d say that 1. Lots of people will rewatch the other series again in anticipation. I’m not sure how this works in terms of them making money from viewing figures. 2. Julia Quinn’s book sales go up.

Or they just like toying with us.

CaragianettE · 01/02/2026 16:01

I only want to subscribe for a month, but there isn't that much on TV I enjoy watching, January is dull with bad weather, and I don't have the patience to be waiting till the end of Feb when I know I could be watching the first 4 episodes now. So, Netflix have successfully doubled their fee from me by splitting it in two - the bastards! Presumably there are enough others like me that they feel it's worthwhile.

JustFish · 01/02/2026 18:30

Pippipumpkin · 01/02/2026 07:31

Similar to the horses and money purse musings, I have spent more time than is reasonable wondering what happened to Sophie's belongings when she left the big country house in the middle of the night with Benedict. Surely the glove is a bit like Cinderella's shoe and vital to prove it was her?
Would she have been able to send for her things maybe?

That too! There are so many small things that don't fit together and it really grates. It's like they don't care about having a coherent story /narrative /buildup and just want to rush onto some tenously strung together sex scenes

Series 1 and 2 worked because they explored the dilemmas, mostly of the female protagonists in their environment. Daphne as the heroine with other characters dealing with contrasting arcs and possible fates for women in that world , with Whistledown as a narrative exposition device to lay out the social rules and decoded them a bit, so it wasn't just niche for Janeites and Heyer fans. Even with all the alternative history and inaccuracies there was a sense that it was a Regency period drama, and the comic/social satire bits had a lightness of touch.

OnlyFrench · 01/02/2026 19:52

Another rare Benedict/Luke Thompson fan here. Delighted to see there’s slightly more chance for a 63 year old French speaking widow 😁. Wonder what his dad is like 🤔

Haven’t read the books but I’m really enjoying this series, particularly Violet’s story

Lunde · 01/02/2026 20:19

outofofficeagain · 01/02/2026 09:36

So, what I also don’t understand (and I have read the book but don’t remember) is what happened to the whole primogeniture thing here?

The wife wouldn’t have inherited the estate, it would have gone to the next male heir (as with the Mondridges). Did they just get left a huge wodge of cash and the title went elsewhere?

Not all estates were entailed in the Regency era - in Pride and Prejudice -Longbourn (the Bennet estate) is entailed to the male line but Rosings is not so Anne de Bourgh inherits unless she marries - women had no property rights so it would become her husband's property.

Oceangrey · 01/02/2026 20:46

I enjoyed it enormously in spite of all the plot holes and inconsistencies.

I do feel the main actors have decent chemistry, and the sub plots are mostly working. Although I fail to see how Sophie leaving one household has such an impact on everyone else's maids.

A bit mad that Benedict is asking girls with blonde or red hair or dark skin whether they were at the masquerade... Come on now.

I assume it will turn out that the money should be hers and not her stepmother's, although Benedict should have enough for both.

Agree the actor with one hand should have been a debutante rather than a maid. I do generally really like the inclusion of actors with various disabilities and the way that is incorporated.

It's worth watching for the historically inaccurate but stunning costumes and sets alone. I'm a bit obsessed with the sleeves of the first dress Violet wears in episode 1, and also her lingerie/corset for the 'tea'.

I would love it if spoilers on the next episodes and series could be kept out of the thread for the moment - I didn't know what was going to happen with Francesca but have a pretty strong idea now!

JustFish · 01/02/2026 21:16

I found the housemaid with a disability unbelievable because a servants work was very physical, with limited labour saving devices, and she would have had to compete in her employment with more able bodied housemaids, in a world that did not have the same attitudes to disability, equity and rights as the present day. No matter how skilled she was at working around and finding alternative methods of completing tasks she would be unlikely to be as versatile as a housemaid with both arms, and therefore less employable in the role.

It felt tokenistic, like a lot of the other nods to inclusion, as though they wanted to employ an actor with a visible physical difference and stuck her in a minor role to 'just be there' where we were supposed to both notice and approve their egalitarian casting while simultaneously ignoring that it jars with the role we are meant to believe she has.

That's not to say there should not have been a character with a limb disability in the series or cast. It would have been great if an actor with a limb disability was cast as a debutant, or any other member of the ton - where it really would be incidental.

FiloPasty · 01/02/2026 21:29

I think it’s difficult to watch and discuss without giving spoilers if you’ve read the books. One of the reasons that I read them was due to similar on an earlier thread for season 2 I think. So I say read the books!
Makes for better discussion.