Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Telly addicts

Channel 4 - To Catch A Copper

397 replies

NameChangeAsICouldBeOverReacting · 29/01/2024 21:11

Thoughts?

I was luckily able to watch this during work due to my job and it absolutely SHOCKED me to my core and really affected me.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Toddlerteaplease · 13/02/2024 21:03

AuContraire · 13/02/2024 16:22

I am now convinced this series is a huge whistle-blowing exercise by the Chief Constable Sarah Crew.

The police woman with the blonde hair that works in the team trying to catch dangerous criminals within the police seems like a very good egg. She hasn't let her experience make her expected standards of behaviour drop (unlike most of the rest of them).

I think you are right.

IIdentifyAsInnocent · 14/02/2024 07:35

@AuContraire she just said exactly that: she needed to shine a light on it. She made a point that she doesn't have control over a lot of it and needs help to change it

Iwasafool · 14/02/2024 10:15

Toddlerteaplease · 12/02/2024 22:01

Shame no one would give evidence in a criminal trial.

It is. I was a civilian admin person in a big force. Officers would get very frustrated in this sort of case. I can see both sides, it is awful that people get away with it, it feels like such a waste of time when someone makes the complaint and you do all the work but then can't finish the job but it is awful for the person making the complaint. Court can be brutal and I've seen experienced officers who have dealt with all sorts being torn apart in court and being really traumatised by it.

It is also hard when there has been lots of work done and a jury finds them guilty and they get given a very short sentence or even no prison time. I remember one case that had involved months and months of work, I'd typed volumes of stuff for court, the two men involved were awful and were found guilty. Can't remember the exact length of the sentence but it was something like 2 years but the slap in the face was it was suspended. The girls who were the victims, their families, the police officers and me were all absolutely gutted. I assume the CPS were as well.

Toddlerteaplease · 14/02/2024 10:54

@Iwasafool I think I'd want to give evidence to make sure he couldn't do it to anyone else.

Iwasafool · 14/02/2024 13:45

Toddlerteaplease · 14/02/2024 10:54

@Iwasafool I think I'd want to give evidence to make sure he couldn't do it to anyone else.

I think that is courageous but we have to understand that not everyone will feel able to do it. I would commend your bravery but I wouldn't condemn anyone who didn't feel they could do it. I honestly don't know if I could and I'm pretty sure my DH (retired police officer) would want me to and would support me.

SunflowerSeeds123 · 14/02/2024 14:12

The young trainee PCSO was so brave to speak up. She is stronger than she knows.

I have nothing but respect for CC Crew. She's trying to highlight the problems. The programme hasn't exactly warmed me to the police in general but I don't think that was the purpose.

The IOPC is a joke.

Toddlerteaplease · 14/02/2024 17:43

I think CC Crew is as disgusted by these outcomes as we all are.

Brumbies · 14/02/2024 19:14

Shocking what goes on in the force.

janiceiand · 14/02/2024 20:20

I don’t understand why he couldn’t be criminally prosecuted without trial / needing the victims, when he ADMITTED the charges to them for the tribunal?

Brumbies · 14/02/2024 20:32

I episode 2 the young man who was in a coma from the bleed on the brain, did he survive, I think I might have missed something.

Toddlerteaplease · 14/02/2024 20:37

Yes he did. He's speaks at the end.

Toddlerteaplease · 14/02/2024 20:37

janiceiand · 14/02/2024 20:20

I don’t understand why he couldn’t be criminally prosecuted without trial / needing the victims, when he ADMITTED the charges to them for the tribunal?

I wondered that same.

IIdentifyAsInnocent · 14/02/2024 21:27

Because there is no will to prosecute them. The police prosecute DV victims all the time

Brumbies · 14/02/2024 22:03

Toddlerteaplease · 14/02/2024 20:37

Yes he did. He's speaks at the end.

Oh ok thanks, I wasn't sure of his name so didn't know if that was him or the stop and search kid. .

janiceiand · 14/02/2024 22:04

IIdentifyAsInnocent · 14/02/2024 21:27

Because there is no will to prosecute them. The police prosecute DV victims all the time

Honestly astounds me. To think they also went to prosecute Lee Cocking’s VICTIM. Police are untouchable. That junior doctor in the news is suspended for using his wife’s Oyster card yet you can send your cock to a colleague or a child, post revenge porn, and you can get a warning… until it keeps happening for 17 years and something is finally done. But not criminally.

Resilience · 14/02/2024 22:26

Revenge porn is classed as a communications offence, not a sexual offence. This means there is no automatic right to anonymity in a trial like there would be in a sexual offence case. The victims in the revenge porn case would therefore have been named, against their express wishes. That' why they didn't proceed with an evidence-led prosecution. There are plans to change this so that victims are given those right, but I don't think they're in place yet and certainly weren't at the time this all took place.

Doesn't change how awful it is, but thought it might help to understand.

Brumbies · 15/02/2024 17:22

The revenge porn, Lovell case, made me wonder. If you were his wife would you stay with him or divorce him?

Iwasafool · 15/02/2024 17:58

Brumbies · 15/02/2024 17:22

The revenge porn, Lovell case, made me wonder. If you were his wife would you stay with him or divorce him?

I'd leave, I'd have thought most would. What I wondered was is he going to lose his pension? When I worked for the police the idea that they could lose their pension was something that would make a lot of officers consider their behaviour. The thing I never found out was if they lost their pension did they get their contributions back.

I believe that one officer I worked with went to prison and was only a couple of years of a full pension and he lost it but I have no idea about the contributions.

duc748 · 15/02/2024 18:22

Been meaning to watch this, and started it last night, so obv I've only skimmed the thread. But bloody hell, that first episode! They just don't give a shit, do they?

ThePure · 16/02/2024 01:12

Just watching the 3rd episode

I thought they had put all the shocking stuff in the 1st episode but it appears there is no shortage of incredibly shocking cases to fill a whole series and this is just from one force

Lovell is another calculated sexual predator in the police who have turned a blind eye to him for 17 years and yet again no prosecution. Thank God Sarah could at least dismiss this one. Genuinely sorry my arse. Genuinely sorry he got caught more likely. I bet he does get to keep his pension.

Join the police where you can groom and grope vulnerable traumatised teenage cadets with impunity! What woman would want to work in that organisation?

5178 complaints
4175 No further action (so far)
43 dismissals
3 convictions

Less than 1% of complaints resulted in any serious action being taken then. You might spin that as being a good thing that there are very few offenders who deserve punishment but after watching this it appears they are all getting off with a pat on the back 'feedback' , the laughable 'reflective chats' or a warning that expires after 2 years.

I applaud all those women who came forward and Sarah Crew for trying to make a change and let in the light on this festering horror

ThePure · 16/02/2024 01:21

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

commonground · 16/02/2024 09:14

And of course the Yapp guy sticks around on full pay for the duration of his suspension (15 months!) and oh, what a surprise, resigns on the day of his hearing. I mean, why not, right?

What is also worrying is that they must have consented to be shown on camera - the arrogance. Maybe they got a thrill out of it? Revolting.

Edited to add - I think he resigned shortly before his hearing. So knew he was bang to rights obvs.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread