'Restore his faith in humanity' - what does that mean if he doesn't win? That people are homophobic?
The opposite. That if they win - a same-sex couple on a prime-time show - the nation have accepted them wholeheartedly.
All three - a woman of colour, a deaf woman, a gay man - will have faced barriers and discrimination that white able-bodied straight people won't have. Representation is important.
Strictly has never just been about the dancing either - the pros know that. So to get through to the final - and then to win the thing - is validation: it is human to want that.
I am under no illusions that, despite teaching sexual orientation equality as part of British values, there will be young people who still use homophobic slurs as part of their 'banter', that young gay men and women still face stigma, that the great British Public are still by and large pearl-clutchers.
So I don't begrudge Johannes saying that. In the same way that I don't begrudge Rose saying her moment of silence has changed people's lives. Because I haven't been in their shoes and their lived experience won't reflect mine.
Either John or Rose would be a worthy winner. I just had my heart set on AJ as she was, for me, the most interesting to watch.