[quote tofuschnitzel]**@Whitney168
To be honest, I'm actually getting a bit 'over' the original, The Bake Off - challenges seem to be getting a bit repetitive, and the contestants don't seem to be quite the same somehow, perhaps in the rush to make sure we have all the diversity boxes ticked, some of the better ones are passed over? Nice people, but somehow not turning out the quality of earlier contestants
That sounds like you think the contestants who tick the "diversity" box are not there based on merit. Surely you are not suggesting that?[/quote]
I know what @Whitney168 is getting at, and I think she's used "diversity" for want of a better word.
It's as though rather than look for good home bakers, the producers (or whatever) have gone for "characters" who will make "good" TV in their opinion, presumeably to try to draw a bigger audience and to sell/markey the show t the US, where "whacky" is what they want. A.lso "moving" back stories
It's like they have a list. "We need an old one, a gay one (either sex), a Muslim one, a non-Causacian one, a single dad, a one who collects one raisins and displays them on the mantel piece, a plucky one recovering from a motorcycle accident, a one who only started sewing last Friday but can make a ball-gown out of tea-towels, an ex-serviceman living in a shop doorway with 50 recipes for mouse-piec etc etc".
In order to avoid a formula (mum/ grandma/ auntie who bakes for school fetes/ birthdays etc), they've introduced another formula - to have everyone as whacky as possible and it's lost its "naturalness".
I appreciate they want to cover all bases and be open to a wide audience, but it just seems to have lost something and I can't put my finger on it. Maybe it's era has passed - who knows?
(And I'm not interested in the obstacles they've had to overcome, though I don't mind seeing a few kids/ dogs/ cats and horses)