Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Telly addicts

Has Leaving Neverland been pulled?

98 replies

Justonemorepancake · 07/04/2019 20:31

I watched part 1 on all4 Friday night, horrific but wanted to watch part 2 for completion/closure. It's not on all4 any more and not coming up on any searches on amazon prime etc. Wondering if some law suit has been brought?

OP posts:
CSIblonde · 25/04/2019 20:17

For what it's worth one of the cleaners from Neverland backs it all up. It's on You Tube. She was bound by a non disclosure agreement before his death so couldn't talk then. He wasn't exactly discreet.

ccmrob12 · 25/04/2019 21:52

If you are referring to Adrian McManus, please. She has already been caught out selling made up stories. If you have a new source I’d be be interested to see the link

ccmrob12 · 25/04/2019 21:54

And if he wasn’t discreet as you claim, how come two surprise raids on the ranch when he wasn’t home not turn up any incriminating evidence. I fail to believe if he was as prolific and a serial paedophile as Reed claims how they found nothing or there weren’t more victims.

ccmrob12 · 25/04/2019 22:00

For everyone who tried to claim they saw stuff, there are literally 2 or 3 times as many who claim the opposite.

Like these guys.

Are all these people really willing to cover up something as sick as padophilia. There is a reason is generally seen as the worst crime to be put in prison for. Paedos are hunted down and killed in prison. You really think they would have turned the eye rather than do something about it? Even the most famous man in the world cannot get away with that. Also Lisa Marie, I believe her when she said if there was any hint of anything wrong she would have lynched him herself. I think she is very credible and level headed and knew him better than most.

SinkGirl · 26/04/2019 07:04

I’m not an apologist as I’m not making excuses for a pedophile. If I were and he had actually been convicted, then your use of the word would be correct, as it stands you are wrong

So you can’t be an apologist unless someone is convicted of a crime, because if they weren’t convicted the crime doesn’t exist?

Marvellous! None of the sexual abuse i experienced as a child happened. Over 90% of reported rapes never happened! That’s wonderful news, thanks for sharing.

SinkGirl · 26/04/2019 07:10

Are all these people really willing to cover up something as sick as padophilia?

Is that a serious question? I cannot believe that anyone anywhere is stupid enough to ask that question. HOW DO YOU THINK THE MAJORITY OF CSA GOES UNREPORTED AND UNCONVICTED?

Why would a man who’s been accused of child sexual abuse continue to share his bed with children?

The parents were also groomed - you’re not getting this are you? Which is ironic since you’ve clearly been groomed by the man’s bullshit yourself.

If you had any understanding of the prevalence of grooming and child sexual abuse, you would not be defending this man.

But hey, there will never be a way to change your mind. Enjoy making money off the back of all this suffering. I personally don’t know how anyone can dress up like this man and look in the mirror, but i can’t understand anyone still scrabbling to defend him either so there we are.

ccmrob12 · 26/04/2019 08:44

I’m sure all of that is true. I don’t think it’s true in this case as the statements are provably false. Therefore is calls the testimony in mot questions. I’m sure on the other cases of abuse, most didn’t have to lie. However as much as we’d like to live in an ideal world, people do lie even about things like CSA.

Glad this countries media is finally starting to wake up.

www.plymouthherald.co.uk/news/news-opinion/michael-jackson-jury-would-struggle-2793688

GunpowderGelatine · 26/04/2019 09:00

@SinkGirl don't argue with it, it's thick and doesn't understand anything about CSA.

For everyone who tried to claim they saw stuff, there are literally 2 or 3 times as many who claim the opposite

OMG I am seriously embarrassed for you.

Read this slowly, and repeat til you get it:

You cannot claim someone else definitely didn't do something unless you were present and awake in their company 24/7 for their whole lives.

Also the peadophile Michael Jackson may have got away with his crimes in his 2005 trial, and you keep whining about "not convicted" however if he was alive and stood trial today here's how that trial would be different from 2005:

  • One less prosecution witness, and two more victims and their families with compelling stories. The "lies" you wang on about about the Grand Canyon and the train station would not be put to the victims, the defence wouldn't do this unless the evidence was compelling, and it's not.
  • We live in a #MeToo era where people have a much, much greater understanding of abuse and grooming, meaning the jury would start off with a more realistic standpoint on the effects of abuse.
  • Changes in US law which means certain pieces of evidence can be included that couldn't be in 2005.

Am I absolutely convinced he'd be convicted if he stood trial today. I think anyone in the legal profession would agree. Your "he wasn't convicted" gubbins is moot.

However I'm interested to know if only convicted pedophiles count, does the man who sexually abused me as a child, and other people not convicted, do they count as pedophies or are they probably innocent too??

ccmrob12 · 26/04/2019 09:17

However I'm interested to know if only convicted pedophiles count, does the man who sexually abused me as a child, and other people not convicted, do they count as pedophies or are they probably innocent too??

I'm confused, as I'm thick, are you ignoring me or interested in hearing me answer your questions?

I've never claimed that people guilty of a crime are always convicted. They aren't, I know this all too well, unfortunately. Technicalities, police losing and bullshit like that...

However not everyone accused of a crime is guilty. People do lie to win money, especially in America. I disagree that a jury would be convinced by all of this, especially with Dan Reed flapping about on social media, he can't decide what is right.

The article that I posted perfectly sums up my views on things. Is that writer of that article a paedophile apologiser too? Whoopi Goldberg, Lisa Marie Presley, Macaulay Culkin, Brett Barnes, Chris Tucker.

Heck even one of Wade Robson's friends doesn't believe him, I've seen recently. Even James Safechuck's Dad doesn't believe he was abused.

These are people who knew all parties involved. I'm going to go with them over some one-sided film made with one goal in mind, to upset and piss off as many people as possible.

ccmrob12 · 26/04/2019 09:18

police losing evidence...that was meant to say.

ccmrob12 · 26/04/2019 09:23

You realise that Wade Robson had his claim thrown out by the judge because he was caught lying in his most recent claim. Even now he can't tell the truth, even now. And not even of the subject of the abuse, but to try and get his case heard and make it valid....and you keep asking me why I don't believe them.

Inkanta · 26/04/2019 16:53

Ha ha - you're such a wind up ccmrob12 Grin

ccmrob12 · 30/04/2019 00:34

You know what is a wind up, you can't buy the film still, it's unofficially cancelled to buy, but you can buy the soundtrack! What a joke. Why the hell does this movie have a soundtrack. And to think there were those who thought this wasn't about the money. Makes a mockery out of it all.

www.amazon.co.uk/Leaving-Neverland-Original-Picture-Soundtrack/dp/B07R4JKT6L/ref=sr_1_12?s=gateway&crid=2XD5FDYMMMYY&keywords=leaving+neverland&sprefix=leaving+neverl%2Caps%2C129&tag=mumsnetforu03-21&qid=1556580782&sr=8-12

WOW!!!

ccmrob12 · 30/04/2019 00:36

What's next, action figures?

Aeroflotgirl · 30/04/2019 22:41

MJ was an obvious child sex abuser, his overt behaviour was very concerning, more went on behind closed doors it is certAin.

HappyMisfit · 30/04/2019 22:50

... a fucking SOUNDTRACK?

How are we supposed to take the accusations seriously when they throw out a soundtrack?

Disturbing on all accounts

ccmrob12 · 30/04/2019 23:20

Exactly...when you go back to the promo shots etc. It's just a money spinner. Absolute joke.

ccmrob12 · 04/05/2019 09:06

www.yahoo.com/entertainment/michael-jackson-estate-slams-hbo-222342924.html?soc_src=community&soc_trk=tw

HBO refusing to have this matter aired in a public arbitration, wonder why. Wonder if this has anything to do with the DVD release being pulled. Jackson want arbitration, to allow for a decision, but HBO don't hmmmm, what are they hiding?

Freedman adds, “HBO does not want this fought in any courtroom because it will expose the falsity and intentional deceptiveness of the documentary. HBO’s reaction to this lawsuit is to delay the inevitable while continuing to misinform the public.”

He continues, “Unfortunately for HBO, neither courts nor arbitrators will allow a one-sided intentionally misleading fiction like the bogus documentary they were complicit in creating. This will be adjudicated hearing both sides of the story which will clearly show HBO’s intentional conscious disregard for the truth and expose how far HBO will go to violate the rights of artists in the pursuit of greed.”

GunpowderGelatine · 04/05/2019 09:09

You're still embarrassing yourself ccm defending peadophiles? Jeez. Go enjoy the sunshine

GunpowderGelatine · 04/05/2019 09:11

And BTW you're SO right about the soundtrack..:
At least six boys accusing Jackson of abuse
Compelling testimonies from them and their families
Millions of dollars paid out to silence these boys
Indecent images of children found at his home
Souvenirs depicting Jackson as God and naked boys as his angels flaunted in his home
Testimonies from staff who saw abuse
Accurate descriptions of markings on Jackson's penis from children
Confessions that boys watched pornography with Jackson

But none of that stands up against a soundtrack being released 10 years posthumously- he MUST be innocent is there's a SOUNDTRACK 🤪🤪

SpamChaudFroid · 04/05/2019 09:23

I'm beginning to wonder if MJ faked his own death and is the poster ccmrob12. Grin

ccmrob12 · 04/05/2019 10:53

Not going to address what I actually posted then? Just spamming really.

GunpowderGelatine · 04/05/2019 11:39

@SpamChaudFroid

@ccmrob12 is there anything to address? The Jackson estate are trying to claim HBO violated a confidentiality agreement that expired two decades ago. Sounds like deluded bunch of cowboys. Why do you think a confidentiality clause was obtained by the Jackson estate in the first place? HBO has every right to air a documentary, Jackson estate doesn't like that their pedophile family member has been exposed. What do you want me to say?

GunpowderGelatine · 04/05/2019 11:42

Sorry Spam there should have been a Grin after your name, stupid app!

ccmrob12 · 04/05/2019 13:01

Well you can’t even get that bit right so there isn’t much hope for you grasping the rest correctly.

It’s nothing to do with a confidentiality agreement...

Busy with gigs this weekend. Booked last night, tonight and tomorrow. Never been a better time to be an MJ impersonater!!!!

Swipe left for the next trending thread