From one of the letters responding to the Mr Craig's complaint:
"If Mr Craig felt that the documentry was biased was and unfair. Then how come earlier today i read a transcript of a radio programme that had the producer of this programme on it. She made this comment "Incidentally Paul and Amanda chose to be called "blind and disabled" - that was their description of themselves. They saw the film twice before it went out and they were happy with it, they felt it was very fair."
Seems to me that the parents were not expecting the forthright response that they are now receiving. Maybe they thought they would become the next generation of Reality Stars that would keep them supplied with copious amounts of cigarettes and beer? .
Someone please explain to me how the editors could have shown filthy children, squalid house, baby eating off floor like a dog, children kept in nappies all day until slaves, sorry, daughters returned from school and a traumatised 9yo who attempted to commit suicide a year earlier any differently?