I have just deleted my second attempt at an answer due to a fecking laptop keyboard (I trained as a typist - it happens all the bloody time).
Summary
pooka you are right, everyone should be treated equally. I dont think travellers are and that the planning laws are used a stick to beat them with. I dont think, in many cases, they have done anything that causes nuisance or danger. I dont think Mr Smith should have to pull down his extension if it doesnt harm anyone either.
Fact is, there are tons of developments that flout the laws and if you have enough money (ok TONS of money) chances are you will get away with a few tweaks.
My lovely Middlesex Hospital is no more. All that is left is the chapel, marrooned in a sea of rubble. A historic, beautiful building knocked down to provide overpriced lux apartments. These are not even going to be built now! Dont tell me that Messers Candy and Candy didnt have a team of lawyers sorting out how to get round planning laws.
OK its not Green Belt land but to some of us Brown Sites are just as important.
From what I have seen of gypsy sites in semi rural areas, you cant see what is on them anyway. The city ones are different because they are squashed on to teeny sites. The one in Camden town was miniscule and tbh manky as it was, it hardly dragged the area down.
Bloody hell, managed not to delete myself. I am off to start a thread on keyboards (yawn).