Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Teenagers

Parenting teenagers has its ups and downs. Get advice from Mumsnetters here.

14 year old has a Burner phone

318 replies

GCRyan · 20/02/2026 09:07

I now know that my 14 year old son has a burner phone.

On his “official” phone that we bought I have it locked from 10pm -7am on school days and midnight to 7 at weekends. It has blocks for gambling, porn and similar key works. He has an allocation of 4 hrs per day, with 1.5 hrs of Snapchat and 1 of TikTok. The rest mostly used on Spotify. He has loudly complained how restrictive I am vs other parents. I feel I am being generous. He has threatened getting a burner for several months and I have ignored this until I found it yesterday.

Am I really out of touch with the volume of phone usage for 14/15 year olds?

I need guidance. I expect if I just take the burner he will get another and then will be much more vigilant in its secretive usage.

Does anyone have any words of experience/wisdom to share?

OP posts:
noblegiraffe · 20/02/2026 09:45

They're discussing a social media ban in various countries at the moment as screen time is so evidently bad for kids and yet you still have people on MN saying 4 hours a day on your isn't enough. Batshit. Although it is half term so maybe it's kids also pissed off at their parents parenting them.

OP - lots of people are saying county lines, which is something that kids get burner phones for, but kids also get burner phones for other reasons, it's more common than you might think. I know kids who have burner phones because their parents track them on life 360 and so they go out to an agreed friend's house, leave their tracked phone there, then take their burner phone with them to the real party.

How can they afford a burner phone? As soon as someone gets a new phone, their old phone becomes a burner. Kids also hand these around. Doesn't need a contract, just a pay as you go sim.

SemperIdem · 20/02/2026 09:46

Blondeshavemorefun · 20/02/2026 09:15

4hrs limit a day is very restricting and should be higher /un restricted

i think the times locked are fine

Are you also a teenager? 4 hours a day is not restrictive.

mikado1 · 20/02/2026 09:47

TheQueenOfTheNight · 20/02/2026 09:28

Regarding phone limits: both apple and android devices allow parental settings for example the phone is locked overnight, certain apps are blocked, other apps have daily limits (max xx minutes/hours per day on YouTube) etc.

I've a teen of the same age and we've relaxed his settings recently. For those wondering why 4 hours per day might not be "enough", my 14yo would have been listening to Spotify while walking to and from school yesterday, and again when cycling to and from his after school sport. So that could be 2 hours of "screen time" used already without looking at his phone. Add on some WhatsApp or Snapchat messaging and checking his school Teams messages, when's that homework due, has the after school support been cancelled due to weather? etc, it quickies adds up even without doing any doomscrolling.

My teens time listening to Spotify or podcasts etc doesn't count as time as he's seen as not active on the phone, the screen is locked. Worth checking out.
I don't think OP has been at all restrictive. 4hours is a huge amount of time and my teen gets nowhere near that and he has self learned to manage it really well. Says a huge amount of snapchat is wasted time with randoms sending streaks etc.
We all know how difficult it js to self-regulate. Most will use the maximum whatever they get.

Tulipvase · 20/02/2026 09:48

Trinity65 · 20/02/2026 09:33

Bang on 👌 👍🏻

also wanted to ask about the Spotify restriction. 2 of my 3 children (and my husband) love music and would hate to be restricted like this. Tbf, those 2 are 17 and 20 so irrelevant now.

sharkstale · 20/02/2026 09:48

I don't have teenager yet, but my friend does, and not long ago she found her 13 year old dd sending and receiving all sorts of inappropriate pictures and messages. She was sneaking out at night and meeting boys. It's made me determined not to give my dd a phone freely as she gets older, there will certainly be rules and restrictions. Phones/sm can be damaging to young kids so I don't think you're wrong.

teaandtoastwouldbenice · 20/02/2026 09:50

I lock DD14s phone 10pm - 7am as well, but she has a LOT more screen time. It’s basically unrestricted (I have to approve downloads) but she isn’t allowed instagram or snap chat.

CarterBeatsTheDevil · 20/02/2026 09:51

I don't think OPs' rules are too restrictive but I would put Spotify on another device for him - there's no need to limit access to music!

IAmKerplunk · 20/02/2026 09:51

Midlifecrisisaverted · 20/02/2026 09:41

All 14 year olds chat on snap chat all the time (or all the ones I know anyway and I know a lot!), it's their version of going round and knocking for your mates, or chatting for hours on the landline. Restricting Snapchat is restricting access to their mates. My son spends hours on line on snap chat with his mates while he's doing other stuff - lifting weights, doing homework, playing X box, cooking tea... His mates will be going about their business and they just chat at intervals. It's weird to us but normal to them. Ref the burner phone, my daughter dug out an old one to use when I took hers off her for a few days when she was 14 (so amounts to the same thing), because she didn't want to not be in contact with her mates. They'll always find a way to flout rules if they feel they're too restrictive

Oh you have reminded me when we first got a landline that you could walk around the house with 🤣 I would be chatting to my mates non stop (after 6pm when it was free 😉) walking round the house, or watching the soaps at the same time as them so we could talk about what was happening 🤣 Used to drive my dad mad! He grew up without a house telephone so didn’t understand why I was constantly on it 🤣

CarterBeatsTheDevil · 20/02/2026 09:52

On the one hand the burner phone raises red flags for me, on the other hand he has repeatedly been saying he'd get one and you'd think that if it was provided by someone scary in a county lines context that he'd be hiding it better. I definitely would be asking questions, though.

Las87 · 20/02/2026 09:53

I have limits on my own phone because I don't have self-control. My (android) phone doesn't count Spotify as screen time if I am just listening to a playlist, only when I turn on the screen to choose a song. If that is also the case for him then 4 hours seems plenty.

Imbusytodaysorry · 20/02/2026 09:57

@GCRyan times are fine . The tik tok no .
Especially the Snapchat as that’s how all the young ones communicate . I’d leave them unrestricted.

TheCriticalThinker · 20/02/2026 09:58

People think a teenager spending four hours a day on phone apps is restrictive??

TikTok, Snapchat are deliberately addictive, they mess with concentration spans and are full of terrible influencers. I wouldn't want a 14 year old spending any time on them

Skybluepinky · 20/02/2026 09:58

Red flags county lines, internet use is the least of your worries.

IAmKerplunk · 20/02/2026 09:59

I’m surprised by the Tik Tok - definitely wouldn’t allow that. At all.

usedtobeaylis · 20/02/2026 10:05

How in the name of fuck is 4 hours PER DAY restrictive? Fucking fucking hell.

The only thing that is unnecessarily restrictive is that Spotify is limited.

Blondeshavemorefun · 20/02/2026 10:07

TeenagersAngst · 20/02/2026 09:27

This is crazy and the reason young people are so messed up.

Why quote me

not crazy at all

nearly every reply above me says it’s restricting in time / same as mine

4hrs is nothing. Esp if playing music - odd game on Roblox etx - bit of internet search for homework and gone

usedtobeaylis · 20/02/2026 10:08

I will never understand why people just accept a tunnel vision life on phones for their kids. Justifying it as 'their version of going and knocking their mate's door'is fucking ludicrous when their mate's door still exists.

redskyAtNigh · 20/02/2026 10:08

TheCriticalThinker · 20/02/2026 09:58

People think a teenager spending four hours a day on phone apps is restrictive??

TikTok, Snapchat are deliberately addictive, they mess with concentration spans and are full of terrible influencers. I wouldn't want a 14 year old spending any time on them

No, they think OP's blanket 4 hours restriction is restrictive. Lots of posters have explained how this can easily get eaten up by entirely innocuous things.

For example, do any of the posters on here really have an issue with the DC doing 2 hours of revision on Seneca following by 2 hours of listening to music on Spotify? That's his whole allowance gone, so if he then wants to message a friend to meet up later, then he can't.

usedtobeaylis · 20/02/2026 10:08

Blondeshavemorefun · 20/02/2026 10:07

Why quote me

not crazy at all

nearly every reply above me says it’s restricting in time / same as mine

4hrs is nothing. Esp if playing music - odd game on Roblox etx - bit of internet search for homework and gone

If you get home from school sometimes after 4 it's your entire evening. It's virtually all their time.

Ionacat · 20/02/2026 10:09

We had similar restrictions at the same age, but no Tik Tok, and no restrictions on music. I was fairly lax if she was messaging her friends on Snap/what’s app and the time went, she’d request more time which generally we just granted especially if all watching something and discussing it. Now the restrictions are taken off, the deal is phone stays outside her room overnight or restrictions go back on and I keep finding it on the stairs in the morning!

Greenwitchart · 20/02/2026 10:09

What has happened to society that people think 4 hour use a day is "restrictive"?

Absolute madness...

usedtobeaylis · 20/02/2026 10:09

Greenwitchart · 20/02/2026 10:09

What has happened to society that people think 4 hour use a day is "restrictive"?

Absolute madness...

Saves them from parenting.

Blondeshavemorefun · 20/02/2026 10:10

SemperIdem · 20/02/2026 09:46

Are you also a teenager? 4 hours a day is not restrictive.

It is with music /spotifly

CostadiMar · 20/02/2026 10:11

Sorry, but some comments here are utterly mad. 4h a day browsing on phone and watching dumb videos is a lot of time to waste for a 14-year old. Time that could be spent more productively - reading books, doing a hobby, doing some sport, studying and meeting friends. That's 28 hours a week of brain-rot.

noblegiraffe · 20/02/2026 10:11

redskyAtNigh · 20/02/2026 10:08

No, they think OP's blanket 4 hours restriction is restrictive. Lots of posters have explained how this can easily get eaten up by entirely innocuous things.

For example, do any of the posters on here really have an issue with the DC doing 2 hours of revision on Seneca following by 2 hours of listening to music on Spotify? That's his whole allowance gone, so if he then wants to message a friend to meet up later, then he can't.

If you think a 14 year old is doing two hours of revision on Seneca every evening on their phone then I have a bridge to sell you.