Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Surrogacy

Join to connect with others in similar situations and discuss legal processes, costs, well-being, and types of surrogacy.

I'm considering being a surrogate

147 replies

TheTwirlyPoos · 18/03/2025 15:35

We have two good friends, they are gay.
They are desperate for a baby and I'd love to help them.
I've had two children of my own and am done.
My husband is uncertain and concerned I will become too attached etc.
Where do we start thinking about this?!

OP posts:
bluegreygreen · 18/03/2025 20:45

Many people feel that surrogacy is abhorrent as a concept, for one major reason: the effect on the child, when considered at all, comes a poor second to the wishes of the adults.

Deliberately to bring a child into a surrogacy scenario, where that child will have to live with the psychological trauma of being immediately removed from his/her mother, should not be acceptable in a civilised country.

Everyone accepts that children can grow up in scenarios where relationships are difficult and stressful, and good parents do their best for their children in those circumstances (family breakdown, bereavement etc). Where parents struggle, family bonds are such that it is usually better for children to remain with parents with support rather than be removed. Why then would anyone even consider immediate removal of an infant from a mother in any scenario other than for that child's safety?

DiscoBeat · 18/03/2025 20:45

I wouldn't do it. It's very altruistic of you and I'm sure that couple would be over the moon but I don't think surrogacy has the baby's interests at any point of their life. And taking them away from their birth mother is brutal. They should get a dog instead!

Lovelyview · 18/03/2025 21:20

BatchCookBabe · 18/03/2025 17:57

@Lovelyview

Most people state their case before resting it. There is no good argument for surrogacy. (In my opinion.)

Fixed that for you. Smile

You still haven't got a good argument for surrogacy though. No-one should have the right to remove a baby from their mother at birth unless the baby is at a greater risk staying with their mother than being removed.

kungfoofighting · 18/03/2025 21:21

ohnonotthisargumentagain · 18/03/2025 17:03

Two thoughts-

Presumably you would have IVF. Are you aware that this can kill you and how would your family cope if that happened? Research OHSS

How do you think that the child will feel growing up knowing that you kept their siblings to grow up with their mum but gave them away?
Research children born of surrogacy, there are adults who have told their stories. Don't just listen to the happy parents.

Presumably you would have IVF. Are you aware that this can kill you and how would your family cope if that happened? Research OHSS

I don’t know anything about surrogacy but I have had IVF.

My clinical profile actually puts me at much higher risk of OHSS than most (PCOS with extremely high AMH that makes me very responsive to IVF meds). It has been very easily managed by my clinic both times despite having very high oestrogen levels.

Anyone considering IVF should be aware of the risks from things like OHSS, however I think this overstates the risk, and could unduly panic someone who is considering or expecting to have IVF.

OchonAgusOchonOh · 18/03/2025 21:22

kungfoofighting · 18/03/2025 20:25

This is actually done very frequently – many couples conceive using donor eggs

Yes they do. And they are at significantly higher risk of pregnancy complications.

TobaccoFlower · 18/03/2025 21:26

OchonAgusOchonOh · 18/03/2025 21:22

Yes they do. And they are at significantly higher risk of pregnancy complications.

Normally people who use donor eggs have got fertility problems so more likely to have pregnancy complications. That wouldn't be the case with surrogates.

kungfoofighting · 18/03/2025 21:27

OchonAgusOchonOh · 18/03/2025 21:22

Yes they do. And they are at significantly higher risk of pregnancy complications.

It may increase the risk for certain things compared to pregnancy with own eggs, however I think this statement:

“This creates huge complications for the woman and the pregnancy, no genetic link to the fetus makes carrying the pregnancy to term very difficult

isn’t really an accurate representation of that.

OchonAgusOchonOh · 18/03/2025 21:48

I posted a link to a peer reviewed journal article earlier that addressed that very issue. They found that pregnancy is higher risk with an unrelated embryo.

They state "When a woman gestates an unrelated embryo, she is significantly more likely to develop preeclampsia and other diseases above and beyond the known risks associated with advanced maternal age, IVF, multiple gestation, and subfertility. Such “allogeneic pregnancies” are riskier even in fertile, healthy, commercial surrogates and when the egg is donated by a young, healthy donor."

kungfoofighting · 18/03/2025 21:51

Yep, I saw that

OchonAgusOchonOh · 18/03/2025 21:51

kungfoofighting · 18/03/2025 21:27

It may increase the risk for certain things compared to pregnancy with own eggs, however I think this statement:

“This creates huge complications for the woman and the pregnancy, no genetic link to the fetus makes carrying the pregnancy to term very difficult

isn’t really an accurate representation of that.

And I didn't make that statement so I'm not sure why you are responding to me.

I responded to the person who stated that many couples conceive using donor eggs by pointing out that doing so puts the mother at significantly higher risk of pregnancy complications.

kungfoofighting · 18/03/2025 21:53

OchonAgusOchonOh · 18/03/2025 21:51

And I didn't make that statement so I'm not sure why you are responding to me.

I responded to the person who stated that many couples conceive using donor eggs by pointing out that doing so puts the mother at significantly higher risk of pregnancy complications.

You quoted me, and so I responded. Maybe you quoted the wrong person by accident.

OchonAgusOchonOh · 18/03/2025 21:53

OchonAgusOchonOh · 18/03/2025 21:48

I posted a link to a peer reviewed journal article earlier that addressed that very issue. They found that pregnancy is higher risk with an unrelated embryo.

They state "When a woman gestates an unrelated embryo, she is significantly more likely to develop preeclampsia and other diseases above and beyond the known risks associated with advanced maternal age, IVF, multiple gestation, and subfertility. Such “allogeneic pregnancies” are riskier even in fertile, healthy, commercial surrogates and when the egg is donated by a young, healthy donor."

This was meant to quote @TobaccoFlower statement:

"Normally people who use donor eggs have got fertility problems so more likely to have pregnancy complications. That wouldn't be the case with surrogates."

kungfoofighting · 18/03/2025 21:55

OchonAgusOchonOh · 18/03/2025 21:51

And I didn't make that statement so I'm not sure why you are responding to me.

I responded to the person who stated that many couples conceive using donor eggs by pointing out that doing so puts the mother at significantly higher risk of pregnancy complications.

Yes, that was me. My comment was a direct response to a statement made by a PP. You joined our conversation.

Notaflippinclue · 18/03/2025 21:56

The thought of 2 men being given a little baby girl doesn’t sit right somehow.

OchonAgusOchonOh · 18/03/2025 21:59

kungfoofighting · 18/03/2025 21:53

You quoted me, and so I responded. Maybe you quoted the wrong person by accident.

Just re-read.

I responded to your comment on many couples using donor eggs.

You responded by addressing a comment from a previous poster which I had nothing to do with. It appeared to me you thought I had made the comment from the previous poster.

OchonAgusOchonOh · 18/03/2025 21:59

kungfoofighting · 18/03/2025 21:55

Yes, that was me. My comment was a direct response to a statement made by a PP. You joined our conversation.

Well, not really. I simply addressed your comment.

kungfoofighting · 18/03/2025 22:00

OchonAgusOchonOh · 18/03/2025 21:59

Well, not really. I simply addressed your comment.

okey dokey

ohnonotthisargumentagain · 18/03/2025 22:11

I nearly died from OHSS. My husband was told to prepare himself. The year before me a woman did die. I think anyone who undertakes IVF should take this very seriously and understand that the risks are seldom fully explained. I would never recommend IVF to anyone and especially not someone who already had children.

MsBucket · 18/03/2025 22:19

Hoppinggreen · 18/03/2025 17:35

A good friend of mine asked me to donate eggs and DH was very concerned about my health if I agreed.
We were also worried about the impact a child that was genetically mine but "belonging" to close friends would have on everyone concerned.
I said no and it did affect our friendship, also they ended up moving overseas, how would I have felt about that if they had been taking a child made from my eggs with them?
And thats without all the risks involved in carrying and giving birth to a baby

That’s a really good point. @TheTwirlyPoos OP, please consider all the pros and cons. You’re the one who will be carrying the baby and with it all the highs and lows of pregnancy as well as all the possible health implications even after giving birth. Think about the life you have now with your husband and your children, do you think you’ll be able to give your baby away? Will you be ok with how your child is raised with the very likely possibility of you not being in their lives at all?

kungfoofighting · 18/03/2025 22:26

ohnonotthisargumentagain · 18/03/2025 22:11

I nearly died from OHSS. My husband was told to prepare himself. The year before me a woman did die. I think anyone who undertakes IVF should take this very seriously and understand that the risks are seldom fully explained. I would never recommend IVF to anyone and especially not someone who already had children.

Sorry you had that experience, sounds very scary x

windysocks · 18/03/2025 22:34

FreshOutOfFucks · 18/03/2025 15:53

It is never in the best interests of the child to remove it from its mother immediately after birth. The long-term developmental and emotional damage is irreparable. Sometimes in tragic circumstances it cannot be helped. But to deliberately inflict that on a child is wicked. Surrogacy is always only ever about what adults want and perceive as 'their right' to a child. Personally, I don't think anyone has a 'right' to a child.

If it were two gay guys adopting a puppy, they'd still have to wait 8-12 weeks until it could be humanely separated from its mother. It's insane to me that we will remove human babies from their mothers as soon as they're born and give them to caregivers who are complete strangers to them.

This

AusMumhere · 18/03/2025 22:36

Notaflippinclue · 18/03/2025 21:56

The thought of 2 men being given a little baby girl doesn’t sit right somehow.

That's a disgusting way to think. Just because they're male, they're going to be abusers of a female child?

PatsFruitCake · 18/03/2025 22:36

There's no good reason for doing this IMO. Loads of potential problems. No one is entitled to be a parent and lots of people aren't but have happy and fulfilling lives.

MrsSkylerWhite · 18/03/2025 22:38

If you think you can carry a baby, give birth and hand said child over to someone else, go for it.

I couldn’t.

PatsFruitCake · 18/03/2025 22:39

AusMumhere · 18/03/2025 22:36

That's a disgusting way to think. Just because they're male, they're going to be abusers of a female child?

That's not what the poster said. I'd want to know that they had good female role models on hand and that they had some understanding of, and respect for, the type of issues that girls and women face.

Swipe left for the next trending thread