Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Style and beauty

Looking for style advice? Chat all about it here. For the latest discounts on fashion and beauty, sign up for Mumsnet Moneysaver emails.

Is The Guardian trolling us with this wedding guest fashion edit?

155 replies

alwaystimeforteatime · 09/06/2025 09:34

Has anyone else seen The Guardian’s "Best Wedding Guest Dresses" article from last week? It's so bad... Even the opening image is a weird choice! (One girl actually looks like she's in pain??) And the clothes are all awful.. Not a single thing I’d wear and most of it looks horrendously unflattering. Am I the only one who thinks this is a list of what NOT to wear to a wedding??

www.theguardian.com/thefilter/2025/jun/06/best-wedding-guest-dresses-uk

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
seaelephant · 09/06/2025 12:22

Of all of them, I counted 1 you could maybe get away with for a wedding. The rest are dire. The pineapple one made me laugh, great way to tell everyone you're there for a swingin' good time!

MoreDangerousThanAWomanScorned · 09/06/2025 12:23

PermanentTemporary · 09/06/2025 11:41

I stand by that a lot of these would look pretty good on the right person at the right wedding. It shows what's happened to fashion journalism that the poor sod writing this has no budget for a photoshoot, so takes a selection of mismatched and too-casual images from the retailer websites, and has to write plaintively that we need to add 'statement necklace and glamorous accessories to make this wedding-worthy'. The whole point is that most of us can't translate the fashion aesthetic, we need someone to show us how it works, but nobody's got the budget any more. Maybe they need to go back to employing fashion artists no doubt for peanuts

I agree with you to an extent, but I do also think there is some deliberate click-baitery going on here (possibly by an editor rather than the actual journalist). There is no other justification for why they would have used as the first entry on the list one that is described, with some understatement, as a very unusual/incongruous choice: 'This oversized linen dress might not be one that you’d normally have down as “wedding guest” attire'. It would have been eyebrow raising halfway through the list, but putting it first can only be because they wanted hate-shares.

Chaaachaaaa · 09/06/2025 12:27

I saw this before your post and thought the same thing. I think someone must have been leaving and decided to have a laugh. It's awful.

Arborist · 09/06/2025 12:31

It’s the current fashion for young people. I’ve been on the Selfridges/HarveyNicks/Liberty websites for a posh frock and quite frankly I’d rather go in a pair of curtains than pay money for this.

KT1113 · 09/06/2025 12:34

haha we have a wedding in the summer coming up, just sent this to my group chat to make sure we havent all ordered #1 given what a clear winner it is 😂

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 09/06/2025 12:37

What on earth is that hideous brown thing? Just possibly suitable to wear for a muddy forest school visit….

TBH I find virtually all fashion journalists’ ideas weird, if not frankly 😱.

strangeandfamiliar · 09/06/2025 12:37

So glad it's not just me! The Guardian's fashion is often (purposely?) ugly and expensive, but this article upped the monstrousness. I scrolled through to the end trying to find anything vaguely wearable, to a wedding or otherwise. Nope.

DisforDarkChocolate · 09/06/2025 12:43

I looked at this because my daughter needs an outfit for a nice wedding soon. Let's just say I never sent her the link. WTF.

Westfacing · 09/06/2025 12:59

The painted Kozo dress looks like something Worzel Gummidge's mum would have worn.

.. but it’s sure to be comfortable and forgiving long into a day of festivities... is obviously the best thing she could say about this dress!

All a good laugh.

Gwenhwyfar · 09/06/2025 13:05

evtheria · 09/06/2025 10:01

Is this the one with the brown smock with black circle? Saw someone on Twitter say 🔔bring out yer dead, bring out yer dead🔔

Edit: Just read it and yeah, it’s that first dress, that looks like it’s for a kindy art teacher who loves grunge music.
I personally like the green diagonal stripe number, though the colour wouldn’t suit me… but I like a few items from that brand (Sika Designs), they do brilliant prints and sculptural/structured shapes.

Edited

I thought of Aunt Lydia.

PickyTits · 09/06/2025 13:12

If someone attended my wedding wearing that first dress, I'd pull them aside and check that they were doing okay.

Pinkyplat · 09/06/2025 13:45

Delphigirl · 09/06/2025 11:53

This might be the ugliest dress I have ever seen

I was going to disagree. But the more you look at it, the worse it gets, actually.

Arborist · 09/06/2025 14:02

https://emikostudios.com/collections/bridal

These are the actual wedding dresses. Surely the designer must be a friend of the journo who wrote the article?

bridal

For bridal enquires please email [email protected]  

https://emikostudios.com/collections/bridal

Mumtumtastic · 09/06/2025 14:10

I suspect AI, look at the lady with the pained expressions feet under her dress, the toes look very odd!

Lunaballoon · 09/06/2025 14:24

Arborist · 09/06/2025 14:02

https://emikostudios.com/collections/bridal

These are the actual wedding dresses. Surely the designer must be a friend of the journo who wrote the article?

Oh my, if the guest outfits weren’t bad enough, behold this one for for bride 😳

Lunaballoon · 09/06/2025 14:38

Lunaballoon · 09/06/2025 14:24

Oh my, if the guest outfits weren’t bad enough, behold this one for for bride 😳

I meant the see-through number with the glum looking model at the top. To be fair to the designer, some of the others aren’t too bad.

Doubleraspberry · 09/06/2025 14:39

Quite nippular though.

Doubleraspberry · 09/06/2025 14:39

I love the Tomei.

MoreDangerousThanAWomanScorned · 09/06/2025 14:44

Lunaballoon · 09/06/2025 14:38

I meant the see-through number with the glum looking model at the top. To be fair to the designer, some of the others aren’t too bad.

I actually really like some of them, but have no idea why they have chosen to style all the photos in a way that suggests the bride is in a hostage situation.

SleepWalkingtoSeville · 09/06/2025 14:57

Fuck me.

…I do like the green stripy one though.

ruethewhirl · 09/06/2025 15:05

What ridiculous clothes. And why are models always put in garments at least two sizes too big for them these days?

PumpkinsAndCoconuts · 09/06/2025 15:05

Lunaballoon · 09/06/2025 14:38

I meant the see-through number with the glum looking model at the top. To be fair to the designer, some of the others aren’t too bad.

for the bride that’s always wanted to flash her parents, (future) in-laws and entire social circle…

ungratefulcat · 09/06/2025 15:10

MoreDangerousThanAWomanScorned · 09/06/2025 12:23

I agree with you to an extent, but I do also think there is some deliberate click-baitery going on here (possibly by an editor rather than the actual journalist). There is no other justification for why they would have used as the first entry on the list one that is described, with some understatement, as a very unusual/incongruous choice: 'This oversized linen dress might not be one that you’d normally have down as “wedding guest” attire'. It would have been eyebrow raising halfway through the list, but putting it first can only be because they wanted hate-shares.

Yes you're probably right, we've probably all played straight into their hands Blush

Swipe left for the next trending thread