@Curly that photo was quite scandalous in its time, as I recall. Is Tony Armstrong-Jones sitting on the loo, as reflected in the mirror? Quelle horreur!
Surely the horsey gene has passed down to Anne (an Olympic rider in her own right), and then Zara? Albeit, Zara's dad is horsey too.
And extra horsey genes to Lady Louise and her carriage driving. For the rest of them, it does seem to be at that aristocratic/polo/fund-raising/Trooping the Colour kind of level.
Interesting about Kate having been pregnant or just post baby for much of her married life, I hadn't totted it up, but of course it's true - and hardly surprising as she married at ~30ish.
Meghan too, I suspect, will have a very brief period back doing royal things before more maternity leave etc again. Given her age (and my assumption she would like more than one child).
Surely the foundation was always going to split as the two boys married and settled into their roles? It feels to me like it was a way for them to channel something of their mother's work and learning about their roles. They added Kate, which kind of worked, but then Harry became a spare wheel. Roll in Meghan and it's huge and cumbersome - plus needing to split the future king and his wife from the not-future king and his family,
(Phew - that got long! A day out of the loop... Thanks to anyone who read to the end!)