Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Step-parenting

Connect with other Mumsnetters here for step-parenting advice and support.

How do you split the costs?

198 replies

Woodstocks · 13/04/2024 12:33

Hello all,

My partner has two sons from a previous marriage, they are primary school aged. We moved in together and bought a house and now split the mortgage, bills and food costs 50:50. The kids are here every other weekend and half the holidays.

I am getting to the point where I feel it isn’t fair to split everything down the middle - the mortgage (even though the extra room is needed for HIS kids) would at least build equity for me overtime but the food money is just gone and with them growing and the horror stories of “teen boys eating” and being here for a whole week during holidays, plus the other weekends etc I feel like I would be significantly out of pocket over the years to come.

I keep thinking “ah it’s only a bit of extra this and extra that” in terms of hygiene items, toothpaste, shower gel, shampoo, extra washing tablets, extra dishwasher runs etc. but then again- these things aren’t free and that’s what their mum gets maintenance for- to cover the extra living costs that are clearly involved.

What would be a fair reflection of the extra cost of them
being here?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Pineapplewaves · 13/04/2024 20:37

I think that you should pay half the mortgage and half the household bills because they would be the same whether the children were there or not.

Your DP should be paying all his DC's expenses when they are staying. Food wise I think you should go 50/50 on breakfast, lunch and dinner where you all eat the same but your DP should pay for any additional food/snacks/treats that they require plus all their toiletries.

arethereanyleftatall · 13/04/2024 20:37

It isn't her problem really @Astariel, it's more a response to her quite strange stance that her dp should in her mind pay the absolute bare minimum for his children.

KeyboardWhinger · 13/04/2024 20:38

trampoline123 · 13/04/2024 14:47

Surely, if you have a mortgage etc together then it's a serious relationship and they're part of your family.

I think it's a bit pathetic.

Not pathetic when the Mother is asking for greater contribution towards these expenses is it?

Pot, kettle.

Woodstocks · 13/04/2024 20:44

Astariel · 13/04/2024 20:34

Why is that the OP’s problem though?

He has them every other weekend. Friday to Sunday so that is 3 days and not 1 . I know it’s not a lot but you are exaggerating

OP posts:
Woodstocks · 13/04/2024 20:48

Astariel · 13/04/2024 20:34

Sadly, the audience on MN is such that you will just be told that it’s his job to pay for his ex.

But… equally, I think my opinion is that he’s welcome to pay for his ex’s days out if he likes. He can spend his money on whatever he likes. He just doesn’t get to ask me to contribute more to make up for that choice.

I think I miss quoted you earlier by mistake. Agree that of course he COULD pay for her if he wanted . He just doesn’t want to seeing that she wanted to take the kids away, has now moved several hours away and is generally insulting and high conflict. So he is doing lots of activities with them when they are here but I think hell would freeze over before he would pay for her to do something!

OP posts:
BibbleandSqwauk · 13/04/2024 20:51

I think the issue around what maintenance is for, whilst not actually the point if this thread is crucially important. The closest the CMS get to a definition is "contribution to essentials" but any decent parent should provide more than that if they possibly can...hobbies for instance, some social activities, music lessons maybe. If, as in this case, the kids are with one parent 26/30 days, realistically ALL of that falls on the RP if maintenance only needs to a contribution to essentials, and not even a 50% contribution. Are we really saying that's ok?

arethereanyleftatall · 13/04/2024 20:54

I think that's quite a strange stance from your dp op.
I really love my dc, just want them to be happy. All the time. I don't mind which is the grown up facilitating that happiness, because that is secondary. I certainly wouldn't restrict it to them just being happy with me, out of spite for their other parent.

KeyboardWhinger · 13/04/2024 20:54

BibbleandSqwauk · 13/04/2024 20:51

I think the issue around what maintenance is for, whilst not actually the point if this thread is crucially important. The closest the CMS get to a definition is "contribution to essentials" but any decent parent should provide more than that if they possibly can...hobbies for instance, some social activities, music lessons maybe. If, as in this case, the kids are with one parent 26/30 days, realistically ALL of that falls on the RP if maintenance only needs to a contribution to essentials, and not even a 50% contribution. Are we really saying that's ok?

Why don’t you start a thread surrounding this yourself?

BibbleandSqwauk · 13/04/2024 20:57

@KeyboardWhinger oh it's been done to death on various boards..I just get frustrated when anyone tries to suggest that paying the mandated CMS is job done and perfectly adequate.

Rowleywaykid · 13/04/2024 21:00

What a petty complaint. Either embrace having step kids or just don’t bother. You knew he had kids. You didn’t need to have a relationship with a man who had children. Either be part of that team or don’t.

KeyboardWhinger · 13/04/2024 21:00

BibbleandSqwauk · 13/04/2024 20:57

@KeyboardWhinger oh it's been done to death on various boards..I just get frustrated when anyone tries to suggest that paying the mandated CMS is job done and perfectly adequate.

OP hasn’t suggested that.

ironorchids · 13/04/2024 21:15

The additional cost of two teenage boys in the coming years is going to be large, and will only get larger if they then do things like go on to university where the amount of loan they get it based on their household income not their parents income. Meaning that if you earn a lot then they'll get less loan as a result of the government expecting you to subsidise them, and this is as fully grown adults.

You are right to be considering these costs now.

I think to make this kind of commitment I'd need a ring on my finger and also to be clear in my relationship as to whether we wanted kids ourselves as well. If you intend to marry and have children with this man then that is going to mean that you will be paying a lot of costs for his existing children. I can't see it working out any other way.

But if you are putting in a big financial commitment (it's not just going to be the odd bit of toothpaste) then I would want a greater commitment from my partner and also to be clear on what kind of family I wanted in the future (do you want more children).

BibbleandSqwauk · 13/04/2024 21:38

@KeyboardWhinger not in so many words but she refers to "full maintenance" in her OP and then commented on the difference between contributing to essentials and indulging in luxuries. I was trying to make the point that expecting an RP to foot the bill for all and every "luxury" such as a hobby is an unfair set up. But I don't want to derail further.

Sweetheart7 · 13/04/2024 21:47

As a single parent I'm a bit disgusted to read your post OP. How long have you been in a relationship? It's clear that you have made a HUGE mistake by buying a house and moving in together. How long did you wait before living with your partner?

School finishes at 3.15pm I suspect its their mother who picks the kids up. Who does the school run on a Monday AM? EOW is the minium contact a father can get he doesn't even do a mid night week stay once a week.

How much CMS does he pay? Again CMS is the legal minium amount the dad pays as the NRP. It is not your place to involve yourself of what the mother spends nor asks for! No sympathy from me tbh!

Is it really costing you that much food EOW? Where do you shop?

Notellinganyone · 13/04/2024 21:48

My DH and I moved in together and I had two children from a previous marriage, we then also had a child together. Our finances have always been entirely shared. My ex did give me some maintenance but we never thought of them as ‘my ‘ expense. I find this aspect of MN weird , the separation in money and parenting. I wouldn’t have been happy with that.

Sweetheart7 · 13/04/2024 21:50

ironorchids · 13/04/2024 21:15

The additional cost of two teenage boys in the coming years is going to be large, and will only get larger if they then do things like go on to university where the amount of loan they get it based on their household income not their parents income. Meaning that if you earn a lot then they'll get less loan as a result of the government expecting you to subsidise them, and this is as fully grown adults.

You are right to be considering these costs now.

I think to make this kind of commitment I'd need a ring on my finger and also to be clear in my relationship as to whether we wanted kids ourselves as well. If you intend to marry and have children with this man then that is going to mean that you will be paying a lot of costs for his existing children. I can't see it working out any other way.

But if you are putting in a big financial commitment (it's not just going to be the odd bit of toothpaste) then I would want a greater commitment from my partner and also to be clear on what kind of family I wanted in the future (do you want more children).

I think its a little too late. Before OP casts judgement though she ought to be very careful she doesn't end up in similar situation herself. By a man that does EOW! Which happens to be her current partner.

Sweetheart7 · 13/04/2024 21:54

Rowleywaykid · 13/04/2024 21:00

What a petty complaint. Either embrace having step kids or just don’t bother. You knew he had kids. You didn’t need to have a relationship with a man who had children. Either be part of that team or don’t.

This with bells 🔔 on.

Chewbecca · 13/04/2024 21:58

Do you see a long term future with this man?

If so, it really doesn't make any difference in the long term. Him putting £20 more into the weekly groceries pot means you still have the same amount overall as a couple, just distributed slightly differently. Is that what you want? Why?

Unexpectedlysinglemum · 13/04/2024 21:59

Noideawhatiam · 13/04/2024 14:44

My partner and I alternate who pays for the shopping.
I pay the week my DC are here and he pays the week it's just our shared child.
Could you do some similar.

That's a good idea

Sweetheart7 · 13/04/2024 22:00

Elektra1 · 13/04/2024 19:48

Let's take the kids out of it. When you decide to live with someone else as a romantic partnership, if one person has significantly less money than the other, for whatever reason (low paid job, illness, whatever), then if each person is "paying for themself/their responsibilities", it's likely there's going to be friction.

Regardless of kids, if I loved someone enough to share a home with them, I would not want them to feel like they were scraping around for pennies while I had plenty. If you share a life you share a life.

Just the other day I read a thread of a woman who lived with her kids, her partner and his kids and he'd taken his kids on a lovely holiday and left her and her kids at home. This is an awful situation for children to grow up in. Step up, or ship out.

I think your 1st paragraph maybe OPs issue! Excellent points made.

Unexpectedlysinglemum · 13/04/2024 22:00

Woodstocks · 13/04/2024 16:21

Sorry I wasn’t clear regarding the maintenance. Yes he pays full maintenance and also does all of the collecting and dropping off as Mum refuses. I just meant that She receives maintenance because Kids cost a lot to maintain- which the payment is for. For exactly the uplift in household items and food etc. so clearly there will also be this elevated cost when they are at our house so I think it would be fair to reflect this.

I agree that the food is the main thing. The extra hygiene things really aren’t worth splitting hairs over - funnily here
boys are cheaper I guess as less toilet paper involved?!

But yes if I have two extra people eating like adults for ten days in a month (weeks holiday and a regular weekend) which could cost a tenner just in food then that will cost the best part of £100 just for that and my share would be £50 month in month out which I think is a lot.

Also the extra toothpaste etc I suppose will last a long time as they use it less

MustBeGinOclock · 13/04/2024 22:22

You married him and took on his kids as part of this no point moaning now.

Hetty123451 · 13/04/2024 22:35

Totally fair enough and I felt similar when my partner and daughter moved in. It’s not about the little bits here and there it’s about making it feel fair to start.

my situation is different as I own the house so pay the mortgage. They don’t pay rent but bills are split and they pay for holidays. As they are starting a new and better paid job I have already started the conversation about splitting it slightly differently with a “generic” child representative cost (one might say similar to maintenance as the child is their responsibility, and this could flex as they age or spend different amounts of time) and other bills going per income. We are both well paid but £50 a month adds up. It’s not about counting every thing but a fair split.

I totally understand. But you also want to function as a unit. Every set up has these kind of money challenges. Just the step one is more complex.

Carrek · 13/04/2024 22:50

Because the OP has chosen to live with a man who has kids. They come as a package. She is now their stepmother, because she's chosen to move in with their father

According to who?

Carrek · 13/04/2024 22:53

Christmastree455555 · 13/04/2024 17:50

When DH moved in both our wages went into one pot, and everything came out - so essentially CM was paid for my DSS out of this too.
It never bothered me - I signed up to it when I decided to get into a relationship with my now husband when he had a six year old. (dSS is now 21!) and I see him as very much one of the family and he’s treated the same as our two other children.

As he should be, but that doesn't mean you pay half of the CMS costs.

Swipe left for the next trending thread