My dp is the sole financial provider for his three sons, 12, 15 & 18. Their dm is a sahm with no mortgage (house bought for her as part of divorce settlement) & a huge cash lump sum. She refuses to work & dh pays all dental, medical, school bills etc. plus 600 pounds a week maintenance. She has never once brought them on holidays - he does all that also - as she doesn't like traveling. Fair enough.
My exh & I split everything down the middle & he pays me the recommended nominal maintenance as I'm the rp.
Exh has only ever taken our kids on holidays once as he has two more & money can be tight. I've taken them every year quite happily & it was always my choice.
Dp & I live together & are now engaged. Dp is taking his kids on holidays again in June & suggested we all go together. I've said no as I genuinely can't afford it as I will need that money to pay for my half of the wedding. Exh also not doing a holiday this year due to finances so my kids will not get a holiday this year. Fair enough - it's really a first world problem.
However these situations really confuse me & I have very mixed feelings around them. I have NO emotional issue with dp taking his kids away & I certainly don't expect him to pay for my kids but it's weird having him discuss a holiday around me & my kids when he lives with us but we can't afford to go.
I also feel that with a wedding coming up he should be stepping back a little and using the money for that but is that silly/unfair of me? His kids have had one major holiday & 3 weekends away every year I've been with him - surely a cut back for one year wouldn't be the end of the world?
And in the future when I can't afford things or choose not to spend money while he does where does that leave us?
I'm not damning anyone here just wondering how others tackle this stuff when there are financial discrepancies & no shared kids?