They didnt tell us on the day itself, but we knew when we went for a break that they had already made their decision by the way the panel were talking to us.
such as
"are you not proud of your daughter"
"you view that as a negative thing"-when i asked why dd had been receiving full education in nursery as compared to other children who received 2.5 hours a day.
they havent taken on board anything we have said about her emotional difficulties, the nursery said she stopped crying last december (when being taken in to nursery) we said no she did it the previous week.
they said her incontinence difficulties are a medical matter and in the report it says we are seeking medical advice re that, we said she,s going to possibly go to school in nappies-what happens then?
we said noone has monitored her for months, it all stopped when we asked for a stat asess, the ed psych hadnt seen her for a year and goes in the thursday before,doesnt speak to us and provides us with an unsigned report on the friday afternoon (the tribunal was on the tuesday) but she was allowed to give evidence off that report.
it actually says in the report that they "prefer" the ed psychs view cos she has been able to support her view with specific observations and testing which go beyond the more general approach taken by the independent psych, they accept ed psych view that ther should be no concern that dd will not be able to cope with a mainstream placement although,of course her progress will continue to be monitored.
they also say they recognise our concerns that dd continues to have incontinence difficulties about which we are taking further professional advice but they find that the balance of professional opinion does not support our view that dd has as yet unidentified needs or that there has been no overview of her condition.
it is clear from parents evidence tht many of their concerns arise from the lack of understanding of the professional reports and that improved communication,particularly with regard to the significance of dd,s test results would be likely to assist them.
confused?
i am.
IPSEA didnt come, they let me down the thursday before, our independent psych was so angry on the day he said he,d never seen anything like it.