Daft mistakes in proposed statement

[Skimmingstones]

Quick question pls. Have received ds's draft and want to get it finalised ASAP as am waiting to secure place in a sp sch.

I am happy with the content entirely but there are a couple of just daft mistakes on wording in the vein of 'gross mother skills' instead of 'gross motor skills'. I don't want to waste any time on getting school named can I just say its fine with these in?

if these are just typo style mistakes I wouldn't bother getting them corrected.

parts 2/3/4 are important

They are all in part 2. But there are just 3 words replacement mistakes such as the one above.

They are statements of fact lifted straight out of the reports in the appendices so I know what they should say!?

I mean the contents (i.e. are all his needs in part 2 and is the provision in part 3 specified/quantified etc?). there are just some typos then I would not worry about it.

Yes all needs are there in part 2, and provision quantified/specified in part 3. They are typos, auto correct failures!

Thanks for reply I won't worry about it.

We have the vestibular system described as deletion of movement in one of ours.

just reply saying it's fine but needs a typo correcting.

Oh dear crazy mistakes ouryve!

There's always something and it always raises a smile :)

They put a different child's name in Part 3 of DS's statement. (I got that altered to show the correct name).

In our statement it says 48 weeks of ABA but actual consent order says 38 weeks? which one is legal?
consent order following settlement instead of tribunal.
any advice please- could we fight for the 48 weeks at annual review?