I just wanted to update on the Meeting mentioned above. It turned out to be with our allocated officer when requesting SA she commented that she had never met DS only read all the information provided when statutory assessment was requested and was a 'neutral' member of the meeting. By the way the staff were squirming everyone else had no idea why they were there either.
All of Ds's CT's (there were 3 in total 
), SENCO, HT, EP were invited. The adviser had everyone introduce themselves. Except myself and DH, then went on to introduce us as the most important people in the meeting!
She had everyone go through the support which they were providing to Ds and noted it all down, firing questions at them as to why and how they can provide more support then gave more recommendations which she clarified with HT each time. Then asked for our views on the support. SENCO kept referring to the OT report (DS was referred due to possible dyspraxia...main concerns writing levels way below what he is capable of) which stated that DS had no issues with fine motor control.
I updated about Podiatry app-still waiting for report, He noted hypermobility....adviser listened and then said what info she had received made a lot more sense now hypermobility had been mentioned. CT's again referred to fine motor skills being excellent and adviser said hypermobility wouldn't affect this it is his muscles which would be causing difficulties which would slow down his progress especially when doing written work amongst other things and make him very tired very quickly.
Apparently Ds really enjoys reading at school 
the only reading he does at home is his reading book and that is not from lack of trying, if he gets books from the library they have more pictures than writing because he finds reading hard. We have noted many symptoms of dyslexia. CT's boasted about how much understanding Ds had of maths etc and what fantastic comprehension he has..and how he could quite easily do YR 5 work, possibly higher (he is in YR 4)
Final 5 minutes of the meeting = Outcome SA was turned down because the school have the funding to provide 15 hours on SA+ and as it stood they were not, Funding was mentioned several times by HT including that there are other children with 'no understanding' who will take priority over Ds because he has understanding 
Much to Advisers disgust, and she kept reminding him that the funds were allocated to all children on SA+ each financial year, some may only need 2 hours/4 hours etc but ALL children on SA+ are receiving funding for 15 hours. What will happen now is the school WILL take on board her recommendations...and she's sure HT would like to see ALL Dc do well. So basically I do not have a leg to stand on with regards to SA 
Adviser kept pointing at the notes about hypermobility, and saying as soon as I get the report get it in to school...that's when everything will change?? 
Although she did make recommendations to help with what had been said already.
When everyone left the meeting adviser and EP hung on behind and EP muttered and that is how you have a team around the child meeting
We are now going to get private Educational assessments done to get a real idea of what levels Ds is actually at with his reading, writing, maths etc