Hi. Just got a report back from the local county refusing funsing for DS nursery to make adaptions (handrail and ramps as DS can't walk due to CP). seems bonkers as a decision as they say the nursery should pay. I'll pick that up with them though.
My question though is why the report was copied to an educational pyschologist. DS doesn't have one, never met one. The funsing appliction was from his OT.
should I just ignore this? write back and say assume that this letter was copied to woman I have never heard of by mistake, or a letter about a different child as clearly this woman knows nothing about my DS, or kick up a fuss as I sure as hell have given no conset for this woman to have anything to do with ds?
I can't decide. I actually think it could be a mistake and should have been copied to the OT not this woman (and I have a good relationship with the O and could ask). Initially I was cross as to my mnd its a clear breach of data protection but I may yet need the department (early years) on side, and I may be due to have a frank exchange of views with the Paed (also copied in the new year). Any theories?