So I had the home visit with BST/SALT yesterday but I won't be getting a copy of the reports yet as they are going to be combined with the EP report (should be happening in a few weeks) and all sent out as 1 document.
Anyway the SALT said DD had no problems with actual talking and has good clear pronunciation etc. but she said she did some tests that showed DD was only using language for a child 1.5 to 2 years younger. She said her use of grammar was particularly bad and also being able to use past tense properly. However, she then showed me another test that DD had done and said that it showed her understanding of language was at an age appropriate level.
Am I right in thinking this means that DD is capable of working at a level higher than she is currently, but she has just fallen behind? This would make sense to me because of the amount of time she has spent out of class. Or have I completely misunderstood it? The SALT did explain it a bit but she started by giving a really long-winded explanation of what centiles were (I understand what centiles are as I use them all the time in my work) so my brain switched off for a while unfortunately and I think I might have missed something important.
Can anyone tell me if my understanding sounds right, please? thankyou :)
(The BST also gave loads of information but I'm still trying to process that, so may be back with more questions later)