Frankly the TH stuff has got to seem a bit cult-like, as people with info from other sources quietly drifted away. That's no criticism of the people who have benefited from TH by the way, just a regret at the loss of a potentially much, much richer discussion.
What upsets me most about the whole TH thang is that over the last few months it's actually totally stifled debate on this board on a range of really interesting areas that could help lots of posters with various issues. At one point I was learning LOADS, as people posted links to really interesting research papers etc.
I'd like to see the discussions open up again as TH is only ONE supplier iykwim. I happen to believe the field is too damn wide for anyone to have the "complete answer", (& no I do not believe that last comment to be a cricitism of TH or those families that have benefited, esp as TH itself admits it cannot help ALL children or difficulties). If you believe in the theoretical foundation of any aspect of the treatments that TH offers then you have no reason to objecting to more in depth discussions such as I'm trying to suggest we attempt to resurrect.
I'm so fed up with the evangalistic jingoism on just one clinic & 2 books by the same author that I'm gonna take the time to list some of the other potential thread search terms that have died away in the last few months in the hope that the discussions will once again open up.
- Dietry Interventions
I personally found the GAPS diet book actually explained more about the link between neurology and the gut in simple non-scientific jargon than any other I'd read in over 20 years of having a personal interest in this area.
The Sunderland protocol is another "supplier" and actually this is based on clinical research that is still ongoing at a major UK University - what happened to these threads?
There are other experts on the link between diet & neurology in the UK and it would be fantastic to hear more about their work too.
- Physical Therapy
Retained reflex therapy, astronaut training, developmental versus functional OT, vestibular training, computerised visual tracking therapy, behavioral optremetrists, sensory intergration training, auditory integration training. That list is just some of the buzzwords a parent looking for appropriate physical interventions to help their child.
Wouldn't it be nice to see some of these split out and discussed individually once more so that people who do only have enough cash for one option or are based in the wrong location can choose the most appropriate for their circumstances?