I had an online forum run in with Indigo at one point, we violently disagreed with one another, yet I would never ever have wished to see her banned, as the discussion helped me clarify my own position on a number of points. Open debate of what may help our children is the only way forward. This is very "flat earth" of MNHQ it has to be said.
Assessment and therapy (if needed) is standard practice for visual tracking issues in Australia. Here it's hard to find anyone who even knows about visual tracking issues much less offers help in the public OR private sector. Sort the visual tracking issues and many a child can lose the "dyslexia" diagnosis.
A similar story is very, very gradually emerging re auditory processing disorders (the inability to "get phonics"). I come from a long line of dyslexics, yet it is only this generation of children who will be able to access help to mitigate the underlying physical causes of dyslexia, for my age group there was still a fight to get the fact "dyslexia" exists acknowledged. Some of what is now regarded as cutting edge, will eventually be seen as old hat by our Grandkids.
Agree too re the nonsense over on AIBU having to be tolerated by SN mums. Rightly or wrongly Indigo took MNHQ at their word and sought to "educate" the ignorant. As she's been punished for attempting this I take it that none of the rest of us will henceforth be encouraged to "educate" next time someone is astonishly rude about our kids?
If Indigo would like to stay in touch hubby, do please pm me & I'll pass on my email. We can continue our ideological and scientific arguments & discussions off line