I say the below with the one, very big, caveat that without knowing what details you have changed, then it is impossible to know if all of the below is accurate in your friend’s situation.
An emergency EHCP review has already agreed that he needs specialist provision, and the LA is looking for a suitable placement.
When was the review meeting? What stage are they up to? The AR process should be as follows:
- Updated advice and information must be circulated at least 2 weeks prior to the AR meeting.
- Then you have the AR meeting.
- Within 2 weeks of the AR meeting, a report must be circulated.
- Within 4 weeks of the AR meeting, the LA must inform your friend if they propose to amend or not. I presume they have agreed that? If they are going to amend, they must send the amendment notice/draft/notice of amendment/proposed amendments (whatever the LA/your friend wants to call it) at the same time and your friend must be given at least 15 days to comment on the amendments and state the preferred placement. Does your friend have a preferred placement?
- Then if the LA is going to amend, they must finalise within 8 weeks of sending the proposed amendments, so max of 12 weeks from the AR meeting.
The EHCP is the key to this.
CAMHS have apparently said therapy can only be offered in an educational setting, which feels completely circular when he currently can’t access one.
This is a lie. CAMHS can offer therapies, both in clinical settings and at home. Having said that, therapies should be in F of the EHCP. The benefit of this is provision not typically available on the NHS can be provided &/or provision in excess of what the NHS offers (e.g. longer sessions &/or more frequently &/or fora greater number of weeks). All without the need to sit on the normal waiting lists. If provision is in F of the EHCP, the LA is ultimately responsible for this provision. This duty is absolute and non-delegable. That applies regardless of any funding arrangements they may want to make.
a specialist worker come into the home and build up trust before gradually supporting the child out into the community/school?
I’m not sure what you mean by a specialist worker(? Your friend would be best to use a job title.) but yes, this is possible. In lots of situations this can be part of a school’s provision as part of transition into a school. In those cases, the school would be named in section I. Lots of s19 provision works to gradually build trust and gradually support DC back into education. In most cases into schools, but not always. The majority of EOTAS/EOTIS packages work towards engagement in &/or out of the home) in one way or another. While many have EOTAS/EOTIS longer term, some reintegrate into schools at a later date.
intensive outreach or engagement support?
The phrase ‘intensive outreach’ is often used to describe a team in mental health services. Yes, that can be possible in what you describe, but what is available will depend on the local NHS offer.
But yes, intensive support for engagement is possible.
a bespoke transition package written into an EHCP?
Yes, a good EHCP will include transition. Since provision in EHCPs is based on needs, it should be tailored to the individual.
social care funding/direct payments used for this kind of support?
Social care funding is very much possible. Many parents have to push for it. That can include for things like being trust and engagement working towards accessing the community. However, the focus of your friend’s wording should be on things other than education - social care are not responsible for education and the will pass the buck. Sometimes LAs even go as far as saying the funding cannot be used during school time during term time.
Has your friend had a proper carer’s assessment and has your friend’s son had a proper assessment of his needs by the children with disabilities team? If refused assessments &/or support, has she challenged the decision(s)? If so, where has she got up to?
The other consideration is, any social care support that educates or trains is actually considered special educational provision, and therefore belongs in F of the EHCP.
Section 19 or EOTAS/EOTIS provision while waiting for a specialist placement?
As long as DC is CSA, section 19 provision should be being provided now. That should continue until DC is in full-time school (if he will be going to school).
EOTAS/EOTIS is only legally possible if it is inappropriate for the provision to be made in a school or college. Waiting for SS wouldn’t prove it is inappropriate.
I have 2 DS with EOTAS/EOTIS/C. It isn’t the easy option. Many have to appeal for a proper package.
a genuinely useful multi-agency plan that went beyond CIN meetings?
Yes, this can happen, but your friend needs a robust EHCP.
I have 3 DC with EHCPs. They all include multi-agency working including termly MDTs. They all including training for members of staff from professionals. The 2 with EOTAS/EOTIS/C include some hours where professionals can seek advice/information from other professionals (in addition to the MDTs and training).
Unfortunately, for many parents, they are the ones who need to lead the charge and drive the process/situation.