Is it acceptable to imply another poster is a pervert because they disagree with you about a topic?

[TheHateUGive]

So in a feminism thread, the members leep insinuating that I am a man with some sort of pee fetish because basically I disagree with them that women have to strip half naked or routinely wear several more layers than men. I've reported these posts as personal attacks but they dont seem to get deleted.

Can I clarify that it is ok to insinuate that someone is a different sex and a pervert because they disagreed with me? I'm asking before I head to other threads.

Maybe we’ll just have to agree to disagree

Heres the Cambridge dictionary definition

‘ To remove means to take, move, or eliminate something or someone from a place, position, or existence. It is a versatile verb used across physical actions (e.g., taking off a coat), digital functions (e.g., deleting data), and abstract concepts (e.g., getting rid of fears). 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Remove can and does mean to move away from a situation
So remove from your backside, which in the definition constitutes the situation, when you need a wee

Its not a stretch to use this word as such, but we are all allowed to think differently of course

ofc whilst we are arguing about whether shifting our pants and trews from our arses to knee level, or holding skirt up and pulling pants down, to allow for non-wetting of our clothes whilst we urinate is 'removing' or 'adjusting' we are not mobilising against the patriarchy.

Cop on, wims. I include myself in this light admonishment.

Agree
It has been a bizarre conversation and I was hoodwinked into it but it’s just so much part of what I have to put up with at work 😒

Troutie I am so sorry you have to put up with such bobbins at work.

Yep, but at least the derail has been taken away from the main thread.

Frankly, who fucking cares if women wear more clothes than men, or if takes them more, or less, time to remove, or not remove, them? Even if my fifteen minute loo break involves me whipping my tights on and off multiple times (or not) or standing in front of the mirror (without the cubicle) putting my lipstick on and brushing my hair VS my DH's three second 'whip it out and piss' visit - SO WHAT? I want to do all of that WITHOUT MEN BEING IN THE LOO WITH ME.
Which was the point of the original thread that the OP nicely derailed.

Ok so for me, underwear following by cycling shorts to stop legs rubbing then dress/skirt/trousers so at least 3 layers. Typical man, trousers and boxers.
Other women, underwear, tights, outwear. So yes women on the whole wear more layers, and as a woman yourself I'm seriously shocked you couldn't work out for yourself what layers women generally wear without persistently asking

This get up has to take forever in the gents.

Think Youre missing the obvious access arrangement for toileting purposes thing sticking out at the front

of note
King Henry’s had to be the biggest.

Yes, but can you imagine how long it would take to unscrew the 'knob nozzle' with those articulated tin gloves on?

🤣🤣 I really don’t want to imagine
but

I’m guessing if you had armour
you had money
so you had a man to unscrew your knob nozzle 😳😂

Knob nozzle is a much better description than cod piece Townclock 👏👏

I bet you're right @BrownTroutBluesAgain .

Of course he would have had a Groom of the Knob Nozzle. The job title probably still exists in name only. I bet Charles is saving it for Farage's elevation to the peerage.

Hi all

We're closing this thread now as it's become a pile-on. Can we remind you that talk guidelines apply everywhere on site - including site stuff? Continued personal attacks will very likely lead to suspensions.

OP - please report concerning posts to us using the report button so that we can take a look and remove anything that breaks TG.