FWR being trolled by a user called AidaP

[Hedgehogforshort]

Hi MNHQ can you please address the issue of a certain poster called AidaP who is not participating in debate he is just trolling.

to be clear this person is a trans woman who has been convicted of violence and is posting promotion of acts of violence against women elsewhere.

in particular there is one elsewhere about using a roughly hewn rolling pin to rape women.

you realy need to look in to him it is just so not on that he is being allowed to bother us here.

You seem to be very selective in which posts you ignore from the same posters. Funny that.

So tell me - these white people that make you unsafe. Does that include white men?

I do think sometimes we should refrain from posting certain thoughts about a persons personal experience or lack of regarding sexual violence, and i am going to ignore the inference that all white people are racist.

I would rather this thread is not deleted.

So on the one hand @GlovedhandsCecilia you say:

Nope because women don't inherently need safeguarding and I dont support that likd of archaic misogyny.

And yet, AS shows you saying this on another thread:

As a woman, I pretty much assume most strange men are dangerous because men cause so.much harm. It isn't even most men but it is enough men to make me wary of all men. I am also aware that society excuses this behaviour in men so they get away with it.

So you're just here to argue the toss, aren't you?

If you are going to argue, at least have the courtesy to read what other posters have written in reply to your arguments!

Thanks BIWI.

Maybe there is a disconnect in articulating how laws and policies support that fear and that those fears are recognised and used to create those laws and policies ?

If you had been raped, you'd know why women are vulnerable to men.

You are familiar with "if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck". If you post like someone who has breezed through life without ever facing male violence, then I will infer, not assume, that you have never faced male violence.

You clearly don't have a rebuttal for any of my points about why women are vulnerable compared to men, because you've resorted to manufactured outrage and personal attacks.

AS is a very useful tool. Also shows just how much hate Cecilia has for girls and women. (As if that weren't evidenced enough on this thread!)

I also don't believe they're here to post in good faith, given the contradictions in the posts I've just read.

I reply to posts as I scroll down the thread. That's why you get none from me for ages, whilst I do other things, and then several at once when I read Mumsnet.

Who made you the police of how to use Mumsnet?

Nice spot.

Nothing quite like someone displaying a spot of doublethink to remind me to use Advanced Search more often.

Why bother to post if you’re not going to read replies or respond to people?

What’s the purpose for you? I may be mistaken, but I thought I read you say that you were here because you’re GC and wanted to find out more about what other GC people thought and felt? In which case, you’re not going to do that if you simply plop your own thoughts, don’t engage in any discussion (other than somehow also managing to find any posts you think attack you and shouting back/reporting), are you?

Which leaves the other possibilities - that you’re just here to tell us all how silly we are with no attempt to engage, or you’re just here to disrupt.

What are you actually here for, and does it include listening to views that are different to your own?

Ive literally never said that!

I post to share my views. I'm not all that interested in peoples views on my views. Especially 16 separate views of my views. And especially where it descended into "you're a man" "you hate women" etc etc. I have.. actually nobody in my life plays those games.

I communicate with a diverse group of Black people with a wide variety of opposing opinions and views. That's just not how we operate, even on topics we all feel extremely passionate about. If you all learn to communicate appropriately, then maybe I'll take more time to read more of the posts

The faux outrage is laughable really.

If you all learn to communicate appropriately, then maybe I'll take more time to read more of the posts

Is this more appropriate?

I'm not outraged by the majority of it. Just not going to interact where it doesnt seem worthwhile.

It really is.

It's just a well worn tactic to 'prove' to MNHQ how upset you are and why posts should be deleted when you report them, IME.

If you all learn to communicate appropriately, then maybe I'll take more time to read more of the posts

This is risible. As well as ignorant.

Just not going to interact where it doesnt seem worthwhile.

👍🏻
let’s all do that

And I think the attempt to bring race into the argument is invidious.

Yes I noticed that - and not for the first time.

Does anyone remember that man who said he was a disabled woman who was outraged about one single post on here..and who went on to post about it and threaten to sue and then that's when the whole 'report those women if you feel unsafe to us on twitter even if you aren't a MN user'...which is how the guidelines came to be readjusted for this board only?

I have no idea why I have been reminded of that this morning.

Well that sounds like you’re just here to broadcast. Why would anybody bother to listen?

What’s the relevance of your communications with black people, rather than all people?

What’s appropriate or inappropriate about how people respond to you, in your view?

Agreed - surely it is possible to discuss without resorting to troll hunting, personal attacks, accusations of lying, or snide / sarcastic comments and insinuations about other posters?

I am not going to criticise people for robust challenges, to posters who seem to be here for no other reason than to have an argument.

Or call their comments as snide etc, either.

Robust =/= snide. You can challenge robustly without sniping or having a dig.

Yawn