Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

Announcement re deletion of Wig and Robe/Judge Flounce threads

871 replies

carrie (mumsnet) · 13/01/2005 13:15

Dear mumsnetters,

We are now able to shed a bit more light as to what actually occurred re the Wig and Robe/Judge Flounce episode. We are pretty sure (having received a confession of as much) that, as some of you suspected, W&R/JF was a non-lawyer masquerading as a QC. Given this knowledge we have deleted the relevant postings and banned the user from the site.

If nothing else the whole business is a salutary reminder that you can never be completely sure that folks are who they say they are and neither should you necessarily completely trust the advice, especially "professional" advice, posted on mumsnet.

As a result of some concerns raised by you we are looking into making parts of the site, the swaps and weight loss clubs for example, something that operates via mumsnet HQ so that people's addresses are not being circulated. If anyone has any other suggestions then please [email protected] or post them here and we promise to consider them.

We?d also remind folks that when organising meet ups you should take the same precautions you would when meeting anyone from the net - make sure you meet in a public place and that others know where you are going.

Having said all that, it would be a shame if this relatively rare occurrence of someone pretending to be someone they are not changed the warm, supportive, welcoming and caring atmosphere on mumsnet - and we're confident that you won't let it!

Thanks for all the supportive and helpful emails we've received from so many of you.

Carrie, Rachel and Justine

OP posts:
aloha · 14/01/2005 15:32

Hmmm.... maybe it is Prince Harry...Schindler's List....hmmm

Tinker · 14/01/2005 15:33

Initials = SS!

franch · 14/01/2005 15:34

LOL aloha, it would be nice to think he could be that clever

MistressMary · 14/01/2005 15:36

okaay I can understand if anyone has been directly involved with this identity and perhaps get the full picture.
But I guess we won't know the full facts ever.
And to be honest I'm not really bothered now.
This sort of things happens sadly at one time or another on a lot of sites it seems.
Just got to be careful I spose? How sad these times are in some ways.
Anyhow thats me own to pennith on this now.

SoupDragon · 14/01/2005 15:37

oh god - libel and treason now.

spacedonkey · 14/01/2005 15:37

He will certainly be reading this thread and thoroughly enjoying the attention. And laughing at the attempts to get to the bottom of it.

JanH · 14/01/2005 15:39

Any attention better than none, you think, SD? Like a toddler?

spacedonkey · 14/01/2005 15:57

Exactly jan. I would be pretty nervous about going to any welsh meetups in the near future as well

Donbean · 14/01/2005 16:10

Well i for one am f**g furious at this miserable spiteful bag of s*t.
As loads of you have already said, i too was drawn in by the references to the bereavement and feel utterly utterly foolish and stupid.
I was genuinely upset and emotional over the story that was played out deliberately.
What kind of bloody sick stupid halfwit would put those things knowing that there are people out there who have actually been through it themselves. The deliberate detail that he went into describing the scene and events minutely is apauling, downright apauling.
Equally i am so mad with myself for believing it all, for worrying and wasting my time and thoughts on this individual.
What goes around comes around.......
Cant say i feel any better about the whole thing now having ranted, i WILL now have to go and buy up Thorntons...to steady my nerves.

Bunglie · 14/01/2005 16:17

Who's idea was it to 'Troll back' as it looks like someone has done it and taken you seriously....using Mumsnet, which I think is a bit off, sorry!
Go to the bottom of the page about 'lost Knob' HERE
I am not saying he does not deserve it, but do not think Mumsnet should have been mentioned.
Come on own up......

ks · 14/01/2005 16:18

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

SoupDragon · 14/01/2005 16:36

No, not a good idea to troll back under the name of MN. Should have used W&R or JF or something similar...

doggiewalker · 14/01/2005 16:37

What do you mean Bunglie? What's "Troll Back"?

iota · 14/01/2005 16:38

maybe it wasn't one of us, but someone impersonating us?

the plot thickens

FineFigureFio · 14/01/2005 16:41

so who is britanny schindler? i cant even navigate the site let alone post on it

tamum · 14/01/2005 16:42

God Bunglie, that's pretty worrying. What a stupid thing for someone to have done.

emmaTooMuchGrub · 14/01/2005 16:45

Is anyone else getting bored with it now?

I was beside myself with excitment at the announcement yesterday. Just bored now.

We need a new scandal

Bunglie · 14/01/2005 16:45

Doggywalker, I must be honest I am not certain, but I think it is where you pretend to be someone on one of his threads and write 'trollish' like things...perhaps the person who suggested it can explain better?

I think it is wrong that they put their name Mums Net. W&R would have been better though!! are there only 2000 members I thought it was more like 20,000, and that would be worrying If you thought that you had 20,000 women watching you...sad *** would probably like the idea though.

doggiewalker · 14/01/2005 16:45

OK. Got it and seen it. mmm.

emmaTooMuchGrub · 14/01/2005 16:47

actually scarp that....we DO NOT need a new scandal

Just read the "trolling back" post........that makes me angry! Silly, silly, silly person!

franch · 14/01/2005 16:49

"Mums Net" - bad idea. Could attract all sorts of scum over here

jampots · 14/01/2005 16:51

OMG - that is NOT good

noddyholder · 14/01/2005 16:51

that was a bad idea

galaxy · 14/01/2005 16:52

What a daft thing to have done (IMO)

aloha · 14/01/2005 16:55

I'm not sure what harm is done though.