Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

Announcement re deletion of Wig and Robe/Judge Flounce threads

871 replies

carrie (mumsnet) · 13/01/2005 13:15

Dear mumsnetters,

We are now able to shed a bit more light as to what actually occurred re the Wig and Robe/Judge Flounce episode. We are pretty sure (having received a confession of as much) that, as some of you suspected, W&R/JF was a non-lawyer masquerading as a QC. Given this knowledge we have deleted the relevant postings and banned the user from the site.

If nothing else the whole business is a salutary reminder that you can never be completely sure that folks are who they say they are and neither should you necessarily completely trust the advice, especially "professional" advice, posted on mumsnet.

As a result of some concerns raised by you we are looking into making parts of the site, the swaps and weight loss clubs for example, something that operates via mumsnet HQ so that people's addresses are not being circulated. If anyone has any other suggestions then please [email protected] or post them here and we promise to consider them.

We?d also remind folks that when organising meet ups you should take the same precautions you would when meeting anyone from the net - make sure you meet in a public place and that others know where you are going.

Having said all that, it would be a shame if this relatively rare occurrence of someone pretending to be someone they are not changed the warm, supportive, welcoming and caring atmosphere on mumsnet - and we're confident that you won't let it!

Thanks for all the supportive and helpful emails we've received from so many of you.

Carrie, Rachel and Justine

OP posts:
franch · 14/01/2005 14:32

Knowhere site

tentunturq · 14/01/2005 15:05

This threAD is way too long for me now, but has anyone suggested that Steve Schindler is also Ted the Dead, wittering away about some amateurish social cognitive behavioural "experiment" (amongst all the puerile sexual insults etc)? I think on the Newark thread of that site.

Tinker · 14/01/2005 15:07

It's a pretty unpleasant site in general I think

moi · 14/01/2005 15:07

I was thinking that when I posted about TedThedead earlier

MistressMary · 14/01/2005 15:09

Sorry but why is this relevent now?
It's dead wood isn't it?

aloha · 14/01/2005 15:14

I strongly disagree. I think it reveals a lot about what kind of person he is. And he isn't just another ignorant, racist hooray, he's third in line to be head of state and a future member of the armed forces.

flashingnose · 14/01/2005 15:15

Who, JF??

tamum · 14/01/2005 15:16

Either you have some startling new inside info on SS/JF aloha, or you're on the wrong thread I do hope it's the former.....

franch · 14/01/2005 15:16

aloha have you posted on the wrong thread? Or is Steve Schindler now 3rd in line to the throne?

tentunturq · 14/01/2005 15:16

PMSL

motherinferior · 14/01/2005 15:16

Aloha, darlin', I don't think Harry's got the brainpower to troll around on MN

aloha · 14/01/2005 15:17

Sorry! Wrong thread

Why is it relevant? I don't think anyone's saying it's 'relevant' - but it is interesting.

JanH · 14/01/2005 15:17

PMSL too!!!!!

alicatsg · 14/01/2005 15:17

no he'd have to get a flunky to do it for him

flashingnose · 14/01/2005 15:18

at Royal flunkie trolling MN!!

LapsedGymJunkie · 14/01/2005 15:18

Thanks for the laugh Aloha.

wild · 14/01/2005 15:19

totally agree about 'Prince' Harry aloha
off to other thread pronto

tamum · 14/01/2005 15:21

Damn, I knew it was too interesting to be true.

I agree, it doesn't have to be relevant, and it's human nature to want to get to the bottom of it (for some of us, anyway). If everyone knew exactly what had gone on and why I'm sure this woudl die down, but we don't. Other people's motivation is endlessly interesting, sadly

galaxy · 14/01/2005 15:21

Agree it's not relevant but I suppose if we found out the truth, we would see it as "closure" - may be important to those who took "it's" advice and feel betrayed.

franch · 14/01/2005 15:23

What would we do if we identified this person and knew for sure its name and address? Just curious!

SoupDragon · 14/01/2005 15:24

SEnd them lots of junk mail catalogues?

FineFigureFio · 14/01/2005 15:24

we all like to gossip that is why mumsnet is so popular

Bunglie · 14/01/2005 15:24

Sorry, Aloha...PMSL @ the troll, but will someone please pass the Tena Lady as I am now sitting in a puddle...and I didn't 'hover'

franch · 14/01/2005 15:25

Ooh SD you are so evil

Tinker · 14/01/2005 15:27

Just find the whole thing amusing and fascinating. Whether it's "relevant" or not is, well, irrelevant. This thread is being read though - that knowhere site has been updated a few times toady.